you seem to not understand that VGA is 4 times clearer than QVGA even if it's sony ericssons QVGA fanboy, lets face it, Sony ericsson never had video recording as its "forte"
though xperia can probably change that, but this phone probably wont.
anonymous, I aint whinin, just would like to tell you that the person who uploaded that picture about the comparative seem to have a different n95 screen than what I have experienced.
p.s. mind making yourself a username? it's quite awkward to address you as "anonymous"
if you need bigger resolution pics than N95 then this is for you
Actually its a camera with some cell phone function.
It should be release under the sony cybershot series not under SE shadow...
I am a huge fan of C902 but i am a symbian freak.otherwise SE got better designs and NOKIA got durability and long life
Anonymous, 21 Jun 2008Again, here's the picture of C905 and the N95 side by side. you can really tell that the LCD d... moreSE C905 Display Looks Brighter and Clearer!
so much for '16M colours' Nokia...
@ All Nokia fans
now Video recording
SE's QVGA is CLEARER and Better Quality then Nokia's VGA
now Picture Quality:
SE's Pictures are NATURAL and Clean...
Nokia's are Grainy but Clear and not Natural
SE's have Better Music Playback and faster Software
SE's Battery Life Million times better then Nokia
SE's UI is Easier to Use and Faster then Nokia's S60
SE's Build Quality is better and STRONGER then Nokia's
im not dissing, im tell the truth
woah this phone has a bigger lens than the n95....now this is interesting as this could probably squeeze in more info/details than the n95
we'll see...after the final release whether it is the case
well how come the screen of the n95 there is grainy? in that picture which compares the screen?
in the actual one the n95 is alot more vibrant than what that link gives...
to anonymous what do you mean by crying wolves?
of course people now use phones as camcorders
if not most...many, can you provide a link that says otherwise?
c905 is no doubt gonna be an excellent phone
but saying its the best is best left as an opinion rather than treat it as a fact...
There's never been a camphone which has optical zoom became a front runner. The K800i never had optical zoom but still produces high quality images.
Again, here's the picture of C905 and the N95 side by side. you can really tell that the LCD display of C905 is more vibrant than N95.
does 16 gazillion colors really makes a difference? LOL!
Anonymous, 20 Jun 2008again 256k colours...when will there be a SE which has 16mill and a bigger screen...c905=epic ... moreActually, there are loads of SE's with 16mil colour screens.
They had either before Nokia had them or around the same time.
Not that 16mil colour screen matters on a 240x320 resolution screen anyway.
Most mobile user uses their phone as a music player and digicam rather than a camcorder. Unless you can really justify the use of a mobile phone which records VGA quality..i'd say you're just a bunch of crying wolves.
Who cares about the led flash if the video recording quality is only QVGA!!!
anyone wanting this amazing handset will need to be with vodafone as they have exclusive rights to the phone til jan 09 like they did with n95 8gb
nokia n96 wins this phone like a piece of cake
1.125g vs 136g(doesnt matter really)
2.16mill vs 256k
3. 2.8inch screen vs 2.4
4.microSD (TransFlash), up to 8GB
- Accelerometer sensor for auto-rotate
- 16 GB internal memory
- 128MB RAM, 256MB storage memory VS Memory Stick Micro (M2), and 160mb internal memory
5.GPRS Class 32, 107 / 64.2 kbps VS Class 10 (4+1/3+2 slots), 32 - 48
6.EDGE Class 32, 296 kbps; DTM Class 11, 177 kbps VS Class 10, 236.8 kbps
7.HSDPA, 3.6 Mbps VS 1.8mbps
8.video(VGA 30fps) vs qvga 30fps
9.DVB-H TV broadcast receiver VS nothing
10. 3,5mm audio output jack VS nothing
and 11,12 the winner is SE for and 8mp cam and better battery...so which phone is better...n96 ofcourse...