Lol you had to mention two devices to try out do the N82 lol. Okay yes for Sketchs and Organizer i know the G900 is better,but what else,i can mention a lot of things in N82 that make the G900 prehistoric EVEN BEFORE RELEASE :-D , and how does your P1 cam do against N82? ;-) so you are prepared to drop the 2.6inch Touchscreen of your P1 to the 2.4inch Touchscreen of G900?
For a NON TOUCHSCREEN 2.4inch is fine, but a 2.4inch TOUCHSCREEN in my opinion is not good, especialy for a UIQ device which needs a Stylus usualy when using the Touchscreen.
i think a 2'4 inch touchscreen is an adequate size for a handy mobile phone. i don't need an oversized screen in an oversized body that usually comes overweight.
Touchscreen maybe a single word but it's possibilities are endless. Like for example it can do a quick jot or sketch as my daily organizing need which make N82 plain stupid.
I remember playing our favorite boardgame side by side with my friend using his N82 against my P1i using touchscreen. Honestly It made his N82 look like prehistoric!!
When he take pictures with it then his N82 is speechless against my Cannon powershot :) :)
The N82 is also an ALL-IN-ONE but it excels at being an Imaging device. Tell me what are these features that the G900 has that the N82 "could only hope for"-funniest statement ive ever heard. What does G900 have over N82 besides Touchscreen? Please tell me
SE's imaging phones are branded as CYBERSHOT which G900 is not (although it's very capable also.)
You can't compare them because G900 is marketed as midrange all-in-one-smartphone with plenty of features that N82 can only hope for.
G900 is a multipurpose smartphone with so many features therefore it's so unfair if you compare them in the imaging department alone. If you really insist that u care ONLY imaging and disregard other features then u rather buy CANNON, NIKON or OLYMPUS DSLRs
N82 and G900 are both Imaging Smartphones. So im guessing they are aimed at similar markets, both mid-range as well. These two are also going to be similarly priced. So how am i comparing phones made for different markets huh? And please tell me besides and undersized touchscreen what else does this have over a N82 and Samsung G810?
stop compaaring two phones that are aimed at completely different markets!!
Tsepz you are the one that really doesn't know how to compare phones or have any knowledge of how to use one.
Im very much aware of what im saying,i know the N82 and G900 have 2.4inch screens BUT for A TOUCHSCREEN 2.4inch is small, 2.6inch and above is better, especialy for finger friendly touch, look at the HTC TOUCH (2.8inch) , HTC TouchDual (2.6inch), SE P1 (2.6inch) , W960 (2.6inch) etc. . . Look at HTC S710 AND S730 both 2.4inch NON TOUCHSCREEN even HTC realise that anything less than 2.6inch is not touch friendly. :-) if you own a W910 imagine that was touchscreen,its way too cramped. Im aware that the M-R one is a proto BUT its camera unit is the same/similar to what K850 has. LOL who said it was positioned as a Cyber-Shot in the 1st place? The fact is the N82 And G900 are mid-range phones, the G900 from what SE said is a mid range handset so is G700 both bringing Touchscreen in to the mid-range market, NOTHING SPECIAL.
and by the way tsepz...the G900 is not being herald as a cybershot phone. the G900 will be in it's class of it's own. i think you're barking on the wrong tree
Tsepz had said that the G900 has a small touchscreen...to think that the G900 and the n82 have the same screen size at 2'4 inch.
you're funny tsepz...you don't even know what you're saying anymore.
it IS a preview, not review... please read carefully, and it still a prototype.
Whats wrong? Can't take the truth? The N82 has been around long enough and is already winning awards and having great FW updates with features being added.
Now please tell me besides the small Touchscreen what does the G900 have over N82?
Have you lot seen the pics taken by G900? Go to Mobile-Review, the K850 Takes better pics than G900.
Don't listen the Nokia fanboys
We will watch and hear what people say a May, and I optimistic thar G900 will give Nokia heart attack, especiallnya N 82.
Nah,thats not true, have you seen the pricing on N82 and the upcoming 6220-Classic? The G900 doesn't even offer HSDPA, its Camera is horrible (check Mobile-Review), it has old hardware, low video, no TV-OUT, no Auto-Rotate etc. . . The NOKIAs are going to give the G900 a VERY hard time, especialy the N82-Black
Although i do agree the G900 is a great phone but don't expect it to beat the NOKIAs, i think Mobile-Review summd up all this nicely. :-)
Touchscreen is Addictive, Trust me
once you get used to Touchscren Phones, theres no turning back!
Nokia havent made a Touchscreen Phone!
N82 was K850i's competitor
this G900 is a Whole new Breeed.
and i dont think Nokia will be able a phone as good as this G900
Does it cost extra to use wifi on a mobile, or is it just your monthly internet bill
uEx4, oh yeath, do you think camera will be improved? LOLz. Remember K850i? :))) True blind SE fanboy you are!
i'm waiting for a new phone and this one seems to be best choice so far. If the price will be expected less than w960, it will distribute heaps of these. Basically i would've decided the n82 instead until i saw this. And for the camera review, like i mentioned maybe a page before, the phone is a prototype, doesn't matter what websites you see, its a prototype. I don't normally recognise sarcasm for the post below so i'll mention n82 doesn't have touchscreen. Yeah i know, you all probably know that.