Phone have touch screen is just feature but as important as Sony forget put a EDGE on this phone guys. Does not have fast data rate transfer. If you live in area that you have no 3G then you need the EDGE technology on the phone for fast data rate. Also the flash o nthis phone is not as good as Nokia N82. Also screen 16M is much better and clear. Who say the eye can not see the 16M. You must be blind then. Compare the old Nokia N70 with Nokia N73 or N82 see which one is more clear. It is ashame to see nice looking phone like G900 is missing few small feature such the EDGE even I agree that 16M is more clear but not important.
whats going on with you people ????.
this is the best phone ever and you are rating it so low. I cant understand it. Maybe stupid nokia fans are doing that
W960 vrs G900
Advantages of W960:
full screen visualizations
8 gb internal memory
Advanatages of G900:
5mp camera with touch focus (W960 has only 3.2 with AF)
Wi-Fi b and g (W960 has only b)
more pocket friendly as its smaller and lighter
Am actually torn between the two....can't decide...I really loved the full screen visualizations on the W960...look real awesome!
What do you guys think?
Its been said again and again but it seems some nokia fans just can't get it through their heads.....16m colors don't matter cause our eyes just can't differentiate between so many colors....
i worked at s.e company. u want know. this is great.. very fast... update guy.. wif 5mp camera very good.. display like 16m..
is better than n82 because has touchscreen is the only phone witch 5mx,wlan and tochscreen now y have n95 and lg wiewty but i realy want a g900
europe is the only market that matters for SE and Nokia, Quad Band must be 4th world. ok this phone rocks, i wish the design was a bit better , may be next model will be soon. SE needs me to design for them why they are not looking at market and all the famous designs now this is old designs, this design only suited K700 up to K800i. they should have changed th design by now and made it more attractive.
please erase the voting results until the phone come to the market
i think that's the way to end these battles of SE and Nokia fans before the phone is even launched
Its like as if the TV output will be an integral part of your everyday life. LOL!
good features but it doesn't have TV output and it's just 256k colors and its just plain ordinary flash not like N82 it has 16m colors with good xenon flash and has really great features and it has OS i forgot mention so I bought N82...
wha? no quad-band despites of its rich feature??? SE must be joking...
PDA-look like with no good band is not very good...
y do ppl owiz compare sky n earth...
this fone is not even out yet...
no offence, i do admit that n82 is well featured, but u claimed 4hrs+ to be gud battery life?? o.O
get real n wake up mate....
you haven't neither use nor tested the G900...how come this early you already made a choice
NO! offend I'm a SE fan but I would rather choose N82 bec. it has good features with great camera and good xenonflash and has a TV output with great battery life bec. my sister bought Nokia N82 in black version cover and I was wrong about N82 and N82 is still the best
well if your gonna choose me from n82 from this phone G900! I prefer NOKIA N82 because it has xenon flash with good features in black cover version...
well i admit this phone has good features but the desgin is just simple and I hope when SE creates another version of this phone they should add tv output and they should make the design more beautiful enough with xenon flash... peace to everyone
is it so hard for se to include edge in a top model almost? i have m600
nice pic...can't wait to get my hands on G900