GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

888k

156k
74k
1.1m

RSS

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • DealsNew
  • Tools
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENTS

Sony Ericsson G900 - user opinions and reviews

Sony Ericsson G900
MORE PICTURES
  • Released 2008, May
    99g, 13mm thickness
    Symbian, UIQ
    160MB storage, Memory Stick Micro slot
  • N/A 3,842,963 hits
  • 34 Become a fan
  • 2.4"
    240x320 pixels
  • 5MP
    Video recorder
  •  
  • 950mAh
    Li-Ion
  • Preview
  • 360° view
  • Pictures
  • Compare
  • Specifications

  • Post your opinion
Pages: «12…181182 183 184185…203204 »

Sort by:
?
  • Anonymous
  • 2Ap
  • 31 Mar 2008

what a shame! no new added features just to boost the performance of this phone. you SE fans would better use nokia phones and explore the real essence of technology. wake up!

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • jW$
  • 31 Mar 2008

this phone is yet to be launched. how come u se fanboys can vote for this phone so high? this phone and G810 are getting the correct rating now only.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 04}
  • 31 Mar 2008

I'm a SE fan lover and just dropping by to say that please vote this phone high bec. NOKIA fan lovers are voting this phone down just to keep their NOKIA phones on the top rating and go to the N-series phone and vote them down specially Nokia N82 and N95...

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • M@T
  • 30 Mar 2008

Not only G900 takes a beating from pathetic nokia fanboys. Even samsung G810 suffers the same.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • w0Q
  • 30 Mar 2008

the ratings are low because nokia fanatics tried sooo hard to take SE phones down. this phone didnt even hit the shelves yet! makes u wonder how people are able to evaluate the phone's performance.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 4tk
  • 30 Mar 2008

Because, it isn't much better than one SE has out right now. Plus it ain't quadband. POS right there.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
T
  • Tsepz
  • N7$
  • 30 Mar 2008

From a review i read it said like all other SE UIQ Wi-Fi phones it doesn't support the g-wi-fi standard,but i see the spec sheet here says it does, but this does,that doesn't change the fact that even a gaming phone from NOKIA beats an imaging SE in almost everything except the camera,lets just hope the camera doesn't have the same Green Tint bug as the P1 and W960.
G900 could have been SO much better in my opinion.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
p
  • pvd
  • fvx
  • 30 Mar 2008

i totally agree with ryan!! this phone deserves at least higher than 8.5!

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • wYJ
  • 30 Mar 2008

what? G900! Id rather use T100.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • wYJ
  • 30 Mar 2008

Im clearly disappointed with the sony ericson phones. Why is it that SE phones are weak? No Wi-fi, EDGE, or the signal reception is too slow? I believe with the comment below, not everyone needs touchscreen.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • mmu
  • 30 Mar 2008

Plus, the N81 has crap camera quality. So what if it records in VGA 30fps? If you have to reduce it to QVGA to make the video look decent it ain't worth a thing.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 0@n
  • 30 Mar 2008

read the specs it does have wifi b and g

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
T
  • Tsepz
  • N7$
  • 30 Mar 2008

N81 better in that:
Has a better battery
Faster CPU
EDGE
Wi-Fi b AND g (G900 only b)
16million colour display
3.5mm jack
A LOT more apps are availbe for it
Supports VGA 30FPS high bit rate videos etc. . . The list goes on. The G900 is running 3yearold hardware and doesnt support or can't run most of the above.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • M@T
  • 30 Mar 2008

Definitely better!

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 0@n
  • 30 Mar 2008

To Tspez
Tell me hoe your lovely N81 is better then this?
the g900 is much better then N81

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
T
  • Tsepz
  • M@T
  • 30 Mar 2008

ALX
Don't be so sure,the newer NOKIAs are very power efficient, like the phone im using: Nokia N81. It has a 1050mAh battery and a stand-by time of 420h whereas the G900 has 380h. Also NOT everyone needs a touchscreen.
Im sorry but the only nice thing about G900 is the Camera, and Touch UI but even my N81 whipes the floor with this, SE need to move away from the 220mhz weak CPU, this is why they have a longer lasting battery than some NOKIAs is because SE use slower CPUs, G900 is also missing EDGE, and 3.5mm jack so realy us NOKIA "Fanboys" arent feeling threatend at all by this already outdated phone, although im sure the Camera will be great.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
j
  • joyology
  • vpc
  • 29 Mar 2008

Off-topic:IMO,one possible reason why the rating of this phone is low because some users may have clicked the "vote" button before rating the item since it's default is "5"... Webmaster should change the default to "-" so voters are forced to select a rating before pressing the VOTE! button...

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
A
  • ALX
  • nw2
  • 29 Mar 2008

OK... this is the first real improve since K750i. I bet this phone will be cheap for its specs.

Good:
- Touchscreen and hardware keys with a good joystick
- Symbian
- Good battery
- Friendly and improved interface
- Wi-fi
- Size

Bad:
- I've seen better looking SE
- No 3.5mm jack

With any doubt this is a very good phone, surpassing nokias bad battery life, big sizes, high prices and lack of touchscreen.
And I think Nokia fan boys know that, since they did a good job lowering the score of this mobile.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 4$v
  • 29 Mar 2008

I rather have the LED flash than the xenon flash because the xenon flash can't be use as a torch or flashlight.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • kU@
  • 29 Mar 2008

dont worry. the g700 rating also will come down in a few days

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
  • Post your opinion
Pages: «12…181182 183 184185…203204 »

Sort by:
Total of 4063 user reviews and opinions for Sony Ericsson G900.
ADVERTISEMENTS

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • BlackBerry
  • Asus
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • Microsoft
  • Vodafone
  • Energizer
  • Cat
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • Ulefone
  • Tecno
  • BLU
  • Acer
  • Wiko
  • Panasonic
  • verykool
  • Plum

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENTS

Check Price

  • WElectronics

Sony Ericsson G900 reviews

Sony Ericsson G900 preview: Touch and go
Touch and go
Sony Ericsson G900 preview
ADVERTISEMENTS

Related devices
The devices our readers are most likely to research together with Sony Ericsson G900

  • Phone
    Sony Ericsson G700
  • Phone
    HTC Touch Diamond

More related devices

Popular from Sony Ericsson

  • Phone
    Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S
  • Phone
    Sony Ericsson Xperia pro
  • Phone
    Sony Ericsson Xperia PLAY
  • Phone
    Sony Ericsson K750
  • Phone
    Sony Ericsson K800
  • Phone
    Sony Ericsson Live with Walkman

More from Sony Ericsson

ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2021 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Contact us Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data