K700's average battery life should be around 2 days. K700's LCD is the main cause of the battery life.
i just bought this phone and my previous one was the nok 6610 , does the 6610 have super long bettery life...or is it just the SE got short battery life...or.i could be my playing with my new phone all day..tats why the battery drains fairly quick
u people are doing an unfair comparsion by bring the 7610 and K700 together. Price is already a great differnce by about 20%. Why i don't see u people bringing the S700 and 7610 together?
Dun bring the K700 and 7610 together, they are targeting on different consumers, the price of 7610 and K700 is also a great difference. How about comparing the 6230 with SE S710? The S710 is going to give a hard kick to 6230.
I dun think comparing a BMW 3 series to Benz E-class is fair.
is it possible to reprogram this phone and how ? coz i've got this O2 thing in there and i dont like it 1 bit..i want it to be the original program . anyone know how ? tell me please.
can somebody hlp pls.
I was wonderin, u kno the way in the T610 the fone took its time while saving pics and takin them, is it the same in K700? I hav a T610 and my friends wer all slagging me coz it does this so im thinking of gettin a k700 which looks class. Thank You.
Your light is on PowerSave, swich it to Automatic, and you will see the clock.
good phone over all...when your not using it...the screen shuts off..i want it to show the clock . anyone know how ? good solid phone over all...but just a tad slow in response
Ya! For those who likes to compare N7610, you must be on the wrong site. Please stop all these nonsense here and go to your Nokia review!!!! Understood????
why is tat you guys keep using the 7610 and compare with this phone ? you should be using the 6230.....unless....the 6230 is really crap that you've gotta use a diffrent range phone to compare with it...
firefly..your last points were the same with your first..you did nothing but repeat the same crappy stuff
you cannot compare the k700 to the 7610 they are a diff class of fones, but then you need to look at the home page here SE kicked Nokia's ass when comparing the S700 to the n7610 what a shame!!!! ha ha yet another quality fone from SE well done
1/ Symbian software - great - but you'd buy a P900 if you wanted something comparable
2/ 1 Meg camera - if you don't think that - at least at this stage of development - that all phone cameras are mearly toys for teens - then you've got no idea what 'quality' is.
3/ Games on a phone - get a life...
4/ Classy design - well, that's your opinion of course....
5/ oh, and the small fact that the 7610 is at least 50% more expensive than the K700
6/ the 6230 is really the logical competitor to the K700, as the price point is similar - shame about the crap screen, REALLY crap camera quality (as opposed to the K700's mearly crap camera quailty)
7/ sure the K700's battery life is crap, but I'm always near a charger at the end of the day, so it doesn't annoy me tooo much
8/ K700's memory is dissappointing, but 6230's MMC is not really easy to use, and if you've ever tried using Nokia PC Suite you'd know what a waste of time that is
If I had the extra money to blow on a 7610, I might buy one, but as it is so much more expensive it doesn't really get considered for buyers of the K700. It's no use comparing an expensive car against a cheaper model - they're for different buyers with different considerations, and for me the K700 is superior to the 6230 at the same price.
So what if one is symbian and one is not? Why does that automatically mean that they can't be compared?
I think what decides if they are comparable is the fact that they are both geared towards the same kinds of people. They features that can be directly compared - mp3/video/photos/games.
Ok, my last point - I think the 7610 is superior to the k700 becauase of:
1)2 years worth of releases of symbian software to customise it.
2)1 Megapixel camera (yes I really think the quality is superb)
3)Nokia Ngage games are playable (I would compare these to Gameboy Advance quality an d speed.
4)Classy design (debatable, I know)
I believe the customisation aspect makes up for any negatives, as if you don't like how the built in 'realplayer' - you can get something else to play media. The phone certainly has a fast enough processor (130Mhz?) to run video/music well. Same applies to alarm etc.
Those are my reasons anyway. I'm not interested in mp3 playability - as I don't think that is a real issue in any case - how many mp3's can you put on the k700? Even if you put the '10' that someone said they could - you don't have much space for anything else! (photos, themes, games etc!)
So I think that is a irrelevant aspect of the K700.
I'm sure you'll beg to differ, but you must agree that the reasons above are good enough to choose the 7610 over the k700.
I am willing to debate anything!
It would be a real loss, please come here when ever you want, you are real amusing to any doctor
Go play with dolls kiddo, let adults here talk about problems of their phones and how to solve them