I love this phone but i have to wonder why SE would "with-hold technology" (as i like to call it as i am sure they could have done it but they decided not to). Firstly the screen isn't up to the standard as i would expect it to be i.e.still 65k colours, and no memory card?!? What's the go with that!!!
video recording + mp3 player +digital camera +..... all these features without a memory card. where to save all these data. sucks
btw..i said that first poly is samsung..not SE..
..anyway..thanx for the correction.. :)
the first color screen and polyponic ringtones is not SE but a local japanese phone company, i forgot the name, that's all. btw i think the first grid menu navigation goes to panasonic gd 75
i missed out the nokia's 9500. it should be nokia's flagship. user friendliness still no match for P900's touchscreen
i'm tired of sending nokia's phone into the service center, mine's and realative's. nokia lack the build quality compared to others company. SE have the P900 as their flagship phone, wat do nokia have?? 6600?? far from P900
btw..first camera phone : t68..first bluetooth:SE...first colour screen: SE...first poly ringtone: samsung...first TFT :samsung... :)
..but hey..where's nokia??..oops..they only good at "Xpress-On" cover..and it was so long long ago..remember 5110? hehehe.....3650 design&materail : sucks..cheap plastic!!..7210 & 7250 & 7bla bla bla..and all other nokias small screen are really bad...I only like 7650 & 5110..(it shows that I'm not totally a nokia hater..hehehe)
i think the k700 is a good phone. BUT it does not have the MMC which makes it kinda useless... u cant store many mp3s or videos. its not worth the price. hope for an upgraded version of the k700 with MMC. oh well at least the screen's bigger than that of n6230.
nokia do hav some really gd phone though..6600 and 6230 are really gd phones..but their sucky phones [which are the majority] overshadow thier gd phones..
i dont understand why people still think nokia is the best phone??..all the opinion below explain all the advantages of SE..and objectively its true that SE is better than Nokia....from all of Nokia's product (which is too many!)..i dont see any big difference from one and other..Nokia only repeated the tech from their past phone to their new product..they only wrapped it with a new stupid packaging..so it looks like a new model!..
T610 sux...sOoOO tRue mAn..sOooO lousy can win the best handset award eH..?
You are compare the CRAP 6220 agains the ultimate T610.
Can you sent pictures and midi with the Nokia 6220? NO.NO.NO.NO and NO
Is the screen from the 6220 so clear like the T610? NO.NO.NO.NO and NO
The video recorder is very lousy just like the cam.Very poor screen.
O mine god it has only CSTN 4K 128x128 pixel screen............Pitty.
The T610 has STN 65K 128x160 pixel screen.
O yah,it has no Bluetooth and it has Crap Irda support like the most Nokia's.
And it's UGLY like the 6230.
And what is so important like EDGE??
I'm very happy with GPRS.
And the T610 feels aluminium in your hands.
And the Nokia 6220 feels like plastick :D:D
Good luck with you Nokia Devil.
Nothing is good about the T610. The menus are slow, the camera sucks, the screen sucks, 2MB memory, you know, all that stuff. On the other hand Nokia offers the 6220 to compete with your dear T610. AT LEAST the 6220 has a video recorder, radio, 5MB memory, stylish design (no small buttons like T610) ! Of course the T610 has Bluetooth and better screen, but no EDGE, for example. The T610 just "feels" good with the aluminium. Nokia is so much better than Sony Ericsson... You all know it, just don't wanna admit it ;)
I never said I don't like SE; I do. I just think saying that they are better than Nokia is crazy. Nokia at least has enough money to release more than 2 phones a year!! Thanks for K700 & S700 in 2004 SE!! Nokia already released 6230 & 7200 (both are very nice) and soon we will be seeing 7610, 7700, and 9500 later on! On May 31st, Nokia has a press conference which I have alot of inside info on, you guys are gonna freak ;)