I agree with Dimebag, I just wish K700 had expandable memory. Can't afford K750 yet
My 3 favourite phone this year are: My K700i, my brothers K750i and my cousins K608i! Those 3 phones I have to say are spectacular and I would choose them over Nokia brands anyday! SE Rules!
Great! 1 mp camera where can u find man for that low price u pay dude? The body is made of pure steel that u can crack a thief head with ease or opening a seafoods like cockles and crabs.. The battery life is excellent, lasts for 5 days with frequent use.. I rarely need to charge it man.. The games are very quality just like the n-gage games.. The bluetooth is very fast, even faster than u running 10 metres at 2 seconds.. U can even ZOOOOMMMM with the camera if u are lazy to go near (that the creature might bite your candy ass) or having poor eyesight (due to black eye by someone).. The space capacity is a lot at 41mb!!! U can store up to 25 mp3
songs.. U can also watch full 3gp porn with it.. Great stuff!!
SE W800i is sooo way better! my bro got k700 and hes sick of it already after 7 months owning it hahahaha! now hes working like a horse just to get the w800i.
I think that is good for us that there are so many brands in cellphone market so we can choose what`s better for us, this is a never-ending conversation, nokia users are very different from us, -SE users- in terms of what we want from a cell phone, I live in america and i can say that SE is #1 brand here, even nokia users are changing their 6230, 6820, 7610 for W800 K750 and K700 for its functions, appearance, screen, accesories, etc., (i swear this is true!!!) because they saw new nokia models and they say "not so good", "i don`t like it" "new SE phones are prettier" "SE gives more accesories" so even nokia users aren`t satisfied with nokia models and prefer SE, that (at least for me) says more than 1000 opinions
To mathew and dimbag. well i said i had a e720, d500, 7610, 6230, 6230i one after another never owned them all at the same time. I now have a z500. The main point i was making about the k700i camera is that i most definately 100% beleive the camera is worse in 640x480 resolution than the nokia 3220. For example when you're inside the k700i camera always and i mean always will look grainy when you take a picture in a dim room. the 3220 on the other hand copes alot better and looks more smoother in dim light and looks brilliant outside. Remember the 3220 camera is almost the same quality as the 6230. Also the k700i makes a loud camera snap noise that you cant turn off. So you cant take discreete pictures in a quiete place without beig noticed.
Bluetooth as i mentioned before on k700i is very poor it takes way too long for that bar to scroll to search in order to pair with a bluetooth device. Nokia's and samsungs find a device straight away with hardly any searching time. You comented on the fact that its a sony- that doesn't mean anything a company can still make a bodge up of a product regardless of how sucessful they are or have been. Plus its not even a full sony product its 50% sony 50% ericsson and ericson made some right bodge up of phones in their time.
transfering files from my pc to my phone is slow....how can i speed up the transfering process?????????
Daz (btw, i am not matthew that comment on you before, so i am a different matthew, check on the service provider)
i bet you don't understand what the dimebag says ^__^ how old are you? and it seems that you are very rich ha? you got 3 samsungs and several nokia fones, you want to show off? aniwae, all the fact that you are saying is completely off... all of them are just simply comes out from you because you don't like SE, thats about it. Look, how come you say that K700 camera is worse than 3220? i already compare the K700 and nokia 6600 directly phone-phone, and in terms of camera, K700 is sharper and better in quality ^___^, not like you said, pls don't provoke here. Still got more, the mp3 sound of the K700 is too good and not even comparable or i would say million times better than 6600. 6600 mp3 sound is just too "pixelated". K700 produce a very clean sound.
Lastly, i am not yet be able to trust samsung's bluetooth since the FIRST PHONE with BLUETOOTH for SAMSUNG is D500!!! which is... comparing to sony ericsson who has THE BEST BLUETOOTH among the other factory, i would go for SE really. Even nokia cannot win against SE. You might say that Nokia can pair very quickly, however, Nokia's bluetooth is not capable of transferring certain files, whereas SE can transfer most file that your phone support. Maybe you will find that the new SE bluetooth is not as good as before in terms of capability, but it doesn't mean that they are degrading theirselves, in fact, they have some good reason for doing it ON PURPOSE, not because they are NOT CAPABLE OF (in Nokia case, they are NOT CAPABLE OF, so you might want to make it different here)
lolx.. why so many matthew down here...
i am actually interested to get this fone although its already outdated
yah your right... but even thou it only has a VGA camera it is close to a 1mega pixel infact when you extend the picture size that wud put you to a .9 megapixel.....
This phone not like other phones.Because it is very differant.Always i love taht phone.Igot more information about this k700 phone.I heat nokia phones because i was had anokia 3100 phone.It gave me more problems.once it was turned off by it self.Like that problems i heat this phone.Sonyericsson k700 phone is vey good.
I think this is the best phone i every had, for this price range you can't find any better phone with MP3 good camera, bluetooth IR, sounds recorder,what else 3D game and mp3 righttone? Nokia NEVER! and try harder
I am the real Matthew, any ways I still love this phone, the 41mb memory is still good enough as you can fit over 8 songs, the camera quality is great (better than any nokias), the battery life drains out simply because of the SE's very powerful screen, and Symbian Phones are not all that, so stop comparing, Symbian phones and the K700i are set for different people!
Also about the picture sound...pathetic, how can you say that is a problem? Theres nothing wrong with that, so speak with meaning and stop making flase and laim judgements on this phone which is just way out of your league!
I regretted buying this lame fone.. :( I will give u guys the reason why.. Its got limited memory space for mp3 and video files at 41mb capacity.. What is Sony thinking? The camera is very poor especially when taking pics at night.. And the pixels needs to be lowered in order to use the digital zoom.. The battery life drains quickly when playing games.. U got a loud sound when taking a pics. Even with silent mode u can't mute it.. I am depressed. I am going to trade it with the mighty symbian fone, Nokia N70 or the N91. I feel sorry for people owning this fone..
this phone sucks,dun ever buy,y,cos it has a lousy cam(vGA)n laggy,dun dun dun ever buy!!!!!!!!
dis fone is ovaa gud bt i jz wntd 2 now hw cn i set mp3 songs as my ringtone??? sum1 plzzz reply...byeeee
Thats true Dimebags, what those everyone think of the new Sony M2 memory card?
Daz, when i wrote about motorola and nokia bluetooth, i mean this two phones are crap on connectivity, from my k700 to a motorola v3, first after 9 times tryin to find V3 i did it, when i send a mp3 file (874 kB), at least spent 6 minutes, when i sent the same file to a SE S710 it finds it inmediattely and s710 receive it in least than 1 minute, nokia`s bluetooth is average not enough to be good, it takes "just" two tryies to find a nokia cellphone, receiving a file is better than motorola but SO MUCH lower than SE transfer starts good but almost at a third part of transfer comunnication is SO slow almost as motorola, even between motorolas is slow and not always finds each other at first try!!!!!, between nokias is slow. Conclusion: SE`s bluetooth is so far away from the others brand, remember IT`S A SONY!!!...