The problem with sonyericsson is that their new phone take very long to launch. Worst is that all the nokie new models have neem introduced on the market and people have bought and used it. Later then, sonyericsson came out a new model slowly slow motion... You see nokia is so agressive coming many new models very soon.
So at that point of time, you either stick with the nokia models or sell at a loss and buy a new se model. Because I only use nokia or sonyericsson phone, no thanks to motorola, siemens, etc..
to all SE fans
nokia always broughts out shocking phones but don't be a fool to change your mind so fast because of WIFI,CZ lens etc. Nokia yes, always makes a publicity to the people know why? even CZ lens in nokia cannot easily beat this one...
Sony Cybershot cameras are usually equipped with CZ lens vario-sonnar/tessar and CCD sensor long time ago so can nokia make the best imaging phone that fast without too much experience in those lens? look at what happen to N90 they hurry everything for a goal to make it best camera phone but shame, k750 beat them all in price and performance.
sony doesn't make OS-powered imaging phones because it will take many time before they can perfect it BTW. is there a NOKIA Symbian that is perfect? Absolutely No many Symbians are reported Lagging and errors/bugs are so many due to constant hurrying. i think all Phone brands know that thing coz most of their imaging phones are not os-powered only nokia. and they keep trying and trying to make a SYMBIAN phone with complete features with a perfect performance and quality. cmon guys open your eyes.
K800 as expected has a 3.2 mp cam. and n93 DVD quality video and CZ lens WIFI,3G etc. they just put those features to hide camera and other hardware's inferiority to most of SE mobiles.
so here is my opinion
K800 vs N93
K800 surely the winner.
Gsm Arena will do a cam test again... let's
BTW do you think CANON IXUS digicams and Sony Cybershot do need an OS to function very well? think of yourself
Performance/Booting of phone:
K800 again, symbian always sluglish when booting phone i have tested many NOKIA before
SE k800 surely. it's an imaging phone with 3g mp3 radio and card slot which are basic needs, N93 has k800's features WIFI edge push to talk etc does anyone need those features? it only increases it's price...
what does it mean Qcif video ? what format ? what resolution? what bitrate ? thx
im going for the best camera phone. Seriously, the n80 has a worse quality camera quality then the K750 in broad daylight with optimal focal range.
Bottom Line: Unless nokia upgrades their camera processors, SE will also beat nokia cameras even without carl-zeiss
I think it's a great phone. Now I am waiting for this series can be released in Indonesia soon with a medium price. Otherwise user ( including me) will come to Nokia.
i love this fone, but after seeing the new N-series...i changed my mind, i think im just gonna wait for the N73 or N93..
You remember that competitor of K800 probably be the N73 with Carl Zeiss lens, CZ lens is only publicity coz the 3,2mpx camera sensor of nokia is inferior to 3,2mpx cybershot sensor of K800, both sensors are CMOS type but cybershot produce good quality sensors and has xenon true flash.
The new SE slider coming soon, this jewel will prresented in may 11/18th, probably this is the rival for N93 (3,2m, 3x optic CZ, autofocus). This slider probably called handycam or cybershot/handycam, and video recording like N93 (VGA, 30fps)
man! n93 it size rather dissapointing...... my experience with n90 is not a sweet memory. i prefer k800 hehe sorry nokia.. size does matter
SE has just been
We're taking orders- N93 & N73 unfortunately.
Ha! This Phones Still Dont Record Video In CIF Quality (MP4). Nokia N93 Will ROCK! Long Live Nokia!
Now we have a real comparison! >> If you're sick of the stupid, constant comparison between the k800 and the N80, here's something new, a real competition!...
Now i was all for the SEk800 but now i see that nokia announced the N93 which features 3.2 mp cam, 3x OPTICAL ZOOM, CARL ZEISS LENSE, and AUTO-Focus (Well done, Nokia - U finally got it right). It also has Wlan/Wi-fi, Symbian S60 OS and 3G.
I am now really confused - should i go SONY Cybershot and Xenon flash (K800), or, should i go Carl Zeiss Optics and Optical Zoom (N93). My feelings now point to the N93. On this site they say that it is going to be released this July ,but (cough), i don't think so. The K800 is also due in July, So i guess which ever phone comes first is the one i'll get.
What do you guys think?
Come on Sony Ericsson get this mobile released early now to see who would be the best mobile released this year Nokias just made the N80 available now so get the K800 released to see who wins the battle,i can"t wait to see both handsets reviewed at side off each other an who wins in each seperate catergory,we know the K800 will win in the camera one but what about the other functions when i see an read them i will makw my choice which mobile to go for as my contract ends the end of may
since november ive been waiting for the n80 and now im having second thoughts,
i dont like the plastic cheap backing and the fact that its a lil big-ish.
this SE is the alternative for people lyk me who like the odd picture capture but are dissapointed by the poor quality of previous phones. 3.2 autofocus, should be crisp.
Apart from business users(who should have a laptops anyway) is going to use the WLAN facilities on the n80.
i think its the k800 for meeee.
Mike, the k800 is 3G and the K790 is not. The k800 has the hole in the grill because thats where the secondary camera is for video calls.
What is the difference between this and the K790? apart from the fact this handset seems to have a circle cut out of the speaker grill at the top - which just ruins it. But apart from that these 2fones, look alike, the specs read alike unless im just being blind. any ideas?
correction on my previous post instead of m600 i meant w950, sorry.
don't forget people that this phone also has a xenon flash which will be so much better than the LED on the w800, but it would of been good if it had a optical zoom but then it would of been thicker due to the motor that it would need to operate the zoom. the only down side is no walkman function and the new walkman phones don't have camera eg. M600. The sony ericsson Rep in australia told that sony is going to seperate their walkman and cybershot phone.