i am with mustin we cannot wait for it for along time every day i see this phone and more than two weeks the company said it comming soon...it comming soon ...i become impatien with this news..
just wanna ask if k800 can change the tone of the message or not??cus most of the ericsson phone cant change the message tones
In addition, Nokia are fast being left behind by SE and Samsung because all handsets they plan to launch are either very (very) big or completely basic with respect to funtions/features. Hope that helps somewhat.
Went to Cebit and saw and had a play with it. It's heavier than expected, but the build quality is very tough and materials used are solid. It's a smart phone with a very good camera - despite all critics of functionality, this phone does exhibit cyber-shot technology and printed photo solution far exceeded that of any other phone currently, or expected to be, released on the consumer market in 2006. That said, the company that stole the show in every respect (phones, plasmas/lcd tvs, laptops, etc.) was Samsung and the D870 drew much more attention than the SE phones. It's lighter and far smaller than the SEK800, but the materials used on it feel too plastic and the handset looks to damage easily if dropped or knocked. A friend of mine,who is a well-known handset trader (all models) prefers the SE. I'd still buy D870 because of it's ultimate portability and versatility. Samsung's range of other new models (not featured yet on this site, and whose names/codes I can't presently recall) are to watch out for - they have some very good handsets coming out towards the latter half of this year.
And as I know too well, both manufacturers are likely to make consumers wait until Summer 2006 to release these handsets.
Dear friends !
No company in this planet can beat the Brand SONY and Sony Ericsson is not an exception.Whether its a TV , Cyber-shot , Walkman , Handycam or any other thing.
Even when people go to the electronic shop they refer to Personal Music player and Recording Cameras as Walkman and Handycam respectively.Now this is another thing that they actually refers to lots of companies making these types of similar products and they are unaware that they are actually using the brand names of SONY.
So , i must say that SONY is like.no.other !
Yeah I guess some of you guys are right, they throw in a couple of Cybershot features into a 3.2 megapixel phone camera and it gets people thinking it's gonna take Cybershot quality pictures! nice strat :) but i still love k800. I don't find the design ugly. it's simple, neat and doesn't scream 'it's a teen phone!'
only the problem with this company phone is this that they introduced new thing but we have to wait for long this is so nice phone but its like the food is near us but we cannot it wait for long to come our chance like say take time to come their product in real market the company so make avilable their products after 2 days from day of released.really waiting to see in my hand
putting the word cybershot on the device doesn't mean that it will have a cybershot picture quality. all what they did is just WRITING the name on the device. i've seen sample pics taken from this device and it's nothing compared to the actual sony cybershot camera's. so it's only a fake thing SE did for the purpose of presenting and innovating new things, which i really found stupid.
Dahm!.. This is a real phone I liked! For all the First Sony Ericsson is a SUPER good brand, because I have a S700i and it lasted for nearly 2 years already and i'ts still in a good condition!!! I'm thinking to change it for a next level, like a K800! Keep it up, before a better one comes!
hello every body . i researched in internet and found out that it's price is about 450 euro . it is not exact price . in answering to that guy who said "whether it has stereo" i declare "yes be sure !" sony ericson is known for it's camera and good quality of sound .
my next choice is this cellphone :)
I agree this is a very functional phone, with the latest tech and features, but still it´s only focused to a one-kind of personality. I think Nokia has the advantage because they center on all type of situation.
Thiz fone's very g0od compared 2 other sonyericsson models. Cybershot, the xenon flash & the 3 megapixels are a very good improvement.
For those who believe tht thiz fone is better than the new nokia models is a looney
Yeah it would b a good competitor but...
I dont think so that is better than n80 or n92, that are smartphones with symbian v9.1, with the upnp tech and the dvb-h(tv) feature or n92s brilliant display,the 16m colours or its modern and fascinating design. So... if ericsson wants 2 keep up with the big boys they better keep on tryin' ! !
i love it, it looks reallll nice. anybody know the video frame rate (the w900i was 30frms/sec which was amazing)
there is nothing negative that we may say about k800. the quality of the sony's cameras and the inovative design of ericsson's ideas makes from a phone a jewel...
thank God for sony ericsson as a cell phone company one of the top fone makers in the moarket there software is above all and also is the quaity of their fones....however sony ericsson lack design i must say....a creative design to b exact none of their fones slide and some hardly flip and the ones that swivel are extremely huge....ihave used the w800 the k750 the w810 and the w900 but however these fone couldnt satisfy my sex appeal lol( to the fone that is)i am jus t hoping someone from ericsson reads this and makes a good slider to my liking :)
I hv SE k750i b4, pic quality is superb, but now with this k800 i cant imagine it pic quality with 3.2 cybershoot cam. Can't wait to get it one...
i think that this trade sony ericsson is the best coz it's a union of 2 big mobile company and we know this very well that sony's camera is the best in the world so when it come in mobile there is not gonna be aggresive competition between other coz sony-ericsson is the boss