sheikh its not like your lousy eyes can see or differenciate 16m colours, i doubt you can even list out the 7 colors of the rainbow.
5mp from nokia is not as good as 3mp with outo focus from k800 believe me, i'v tried (if we look them from your comp). From the overall specs nokia always has an advantage over SE, but when it come to specialization Se is always the best.....
just look at the quality photo and the flash... or look at the walkman phone...
and other good things about SE specialization is that all SE phones are affordable.... that is the main thing !!!affordable!!! - without leaving the quality behind.
When is this coming out!!! I want one. So glad I waited and didn't get the K800i:).
BTW 5MP Nokia's with Wi-Fi, HSDPA and 16m colour displays are all huge and really disgusting when it comes to the design. So do you want an ugly phone with everything or a good looking phone with nice features. BTW who uses every single feature on their phone? I don't think a lot of people would put up their hand.
fantastic fone. Great camera but not video.
Problem dis era,
1)Nokia- Always hang n slow processor.
2)SE- sound n charger port
3)Samsung- No ringing tone 4 message
4)Motorola- Slow processor n camera
SE notbad for this phone
but should come out with something new...
always the same thing...
rather go for K800 cuz the price lower...
the cybershot is still one the best
good quality and very sharp and color good
plus bes of all is the Xenon flash la
does this phone uses CCD SENSOR OR CMOS SENSOR, since sony said that they are going to modify the k750i by replacing cmos sensor by ccd sensor, and they are also going improve autofocus feature further more and they are going to improve macro mode, options, ie to improve pictures taken at 5 m or less.
I always feel that, that this peice should be better than k800. and they have adjusted the design too.
to sheikh, don't see why you have to make fun of sony ericsson's product, i myself having used both nokia and ericsson prefer ericsson over nokia. to tell the truth is there really a need for 16 mill colour and talking about picture quality i gotta say ericsson owns nokia. Also marketing a phone isnt just about how hightech the phoen is, is whether or not developing a high quality phone that can satisfy the need of the potential consumers and i believe ericsson is done very well in its product development. point is not expensive and suites the need of users. but i gotta say this 810 is a shame no diff than k800 and infact more ugly.
others have come with 5 MP...and 16 m colors display, advanced video recording...and enhanced music and entertainment features...
what about HSDPA, Wi-Fi, hot swap memory stick?
no big leap...
don't just give another choice, but a better one...a lot better if possible!
its same as k800 except change of facelift buttons etc,look at ur competitors 16M resolutions ty output SHAME
using carl zeiss optics would be pointless. the size and quality of the sensors is so low that it would make no difference -- the lens is not the restricting factor on image quality, the sensor is. the only real way to improve the image quality is increasing the size of the sensor.
no infrared port?? coz in another website that K810 has infrared port...
is the video recording quality improved???
the only thing about this phone i dont like is the keypad otherwise a great phone
All this different to the K800 is the style and the exception of the infared port and the extended battery life.
The Silver K800i looks good. This looks nice. I myt buy. I lyk the keypad
fyi guys...my k800 can play mp4 audio (smaller than mp3 but same quality)...definitely k810 can also play mp4
nicee phone..i would buy....maybe..
that keypad looks like its come out of star trek and it loooks ugly!!!...i think the original K800i looks better....
all round though its a nice phone....providing they change the keypad ...looks aree everything these days and this K810 keypad is crapp..looks to RETRO and oldd fashioned lol.!!
i haven't owned K800 phone before, it would be better, if Sony would have used carl-zies optic lens in this K810 as used by nokia in n73/n93 and by Sharp903sh. On comparing k790/k800 with sharp 903sh, and the winner is sharp 903sh expect at low light pictures, but it not too bad, may be xenon flash wins.
Now i am waiting for the results of K810/K800/N73/903SH/N93i. Who wins, don't under estimate Sharp 903SH. its a fantastic phone even better than N93. I searched through net for the reviews, and they say Sharp wins. but nobody knows.
what abt video ecordin on k810? is it same as k800..i mean poor video recording?