wait 4 se k890i. it hav 2.8''touchsreen desplay and 7.1megapxl cam with opticle zoom
I'm also getting this phone, so after I actually have more then a day's time with it, I'll be my own judge, and give out a bit of REALISTIC information about this phone, so that OTHERS CAN BE THEIR OWN JUDGE for this phone.
Woops, (almost forgot/did forget) something;
How fast you are to say that the K850 has a lack of features.
Then you are surely able to say that about the phone you find so glamorous, the N82. Everything is the same with that phone, GPS and WiFi disregarded, because who in their right mind would want to stop when they're traveling to connect to a network that takes 5 minutes longer then HSDPA to go to google?
The only thing that gives it to Nokia is the video quality, but the only thing that gives it to Sony Ericsson is their hardware quality. Sony Ericsson have gone with a strategy opposite of Nokia's. Nokia has phones that are low in quality and build, but average in terms of the same areas. Sony Ericsson's quality is varied upon each phone/batch, and can be utterly bad, or amazingly good.
I also believe that you didn't acknowledge my post, because you've come to accept the points I've stated, which means that you should stop coming here to tell us that the N95/N82/N-whattatheirshytcallsit is better then the K850. Instead, if you'd rather want people to turn their heads away from this phone, why not just solve other's problems if they had the same as yours, and tell them to wait like you are, for the N82. Don't off the bat hit everyone with a "This K850 phone is a disgrace, go get the N82 everyone, because it's new, 5MP, it's from Nokia and it's video resolution is much better". That will get you ignored, and people who either love this phone or Sony Ericsson will just think you're either a NokiaFanboy, stupid or both.
You guys aren't the same person, are you?
Because if you are, you're stupid for having to either reset your modem just to stay hidden, or change computers within a network just to avoid the embarrasment give to you from all of these people who don't give a sh|t about Nokia's dominant video resolution. The useability on that phone is far worse then even the basic of phones.
Also, the pattern in which you're posting just gives it away, unless all three or atleast two of you are the type to post after you posted, because you just remember what else you wanted to whip out of that partly mushy brain of yours.
What're you trying to prove? That the K850 is slower then the N82? N82's camera speed is just the same.
Tell me how often on average do you even take a video within a month for it to make so much of a difference between the K850 and N95. Stop being stupid and look at the realistic useages of each phone.
And that's what Sony Ericsson is about, reality, just like their picture quality, unlike the N95 with pictures that are no where close to being professional, instead, they're like a kid's pick of pictures.
Please, if you make a phone that's suppose to be 'king', then make a phone that's fit to be used by a king, not a dork. Alot of people that Nokia rally up with the N95 are people who need simple phones, yet have to impede a big ergonomic flaw onto them, which is stupid.
In terms of realistic useages, the K850 surpasses this phone. If Motorola made their RAZR2 phone with a 5MP camera, even IT would far surpass the N95, which is pretty sad. Even if it holds the same flaw as this camera, the video resolution/quality.
i believe that ur a fanatic fan of SE, thats good boy, i agrre withu, but sometimes, if i ve plan to buy an expensive cell, ive little doubt with SE after salesservice, especially in Indonesia, SE sales is not informative as nokia did.
don't ask people to like something that you like or vice versa. if the phone suits you, then buy it, if not find another one that suits you. no need to compare with others which is best. as long as the phones works fine with you, then it's the best. at least for you...:D..
unless you got some benefit (i.e. got paid or something)of posting your opinions here by slamming other models. Bored of reading views that uses a lot of 'trash' words. some of them come from a company "CEO" or something...:D. pity...at least for his/her subordinates...
johnny boys right i dnt support him or anything ive had a lot of fones ive had both nokia and ericsson
ericsson cameras are better than nokia even though they have the same megapixel. . . . but the ericssons video is really crapy. the only thing that sucks wit ericssons is that they all have the same features. . . the dont add anything else like the k800i and k810i theres no difference except for the name, looks and mgpxl. and yeah the nokias batterys dont last very long
i have the n95 and the iphone. . . . the iphone only has a 2 megapixel camera but the camera is better than my previous fone the ericsson k800i and the video of the ericssons are not that good its really only for videos
yes i saw the review vs n95(older). k850 has inferior video.
guys checkout the video quality of this fon here with the older n95. k850 looses very badly.
by the way johnnny boy. good to hear you are contented with the crap video of k850.
well its just the way things go(SE video sucks). you buy another cam with good video if you like. good for you.
Nokia ppl are spec fanactics. They dont care how it performs in real world usage, just that they can say their phone has it and can do it, even if it does it half-ass and those same specs destroy battery life. Plus the SYMBIAN OS STINKS! JACK of all trades, MASTER OF NONE!
The video stinks on k850i, WE GET IT! Its camera kicks ass though, and will only get better with firmware updates. It runs smoothly and battery life is good/great. Has both l.e.d.(torch and video recording) and xenon flash. Great music with in-line 3.5 mm jack and mic. All in a rather small package when considered. (smaller than N95 and N82) Once you've had a SE it's hard to change. Still find things on my SE's to this day that I didn't know they could do. I'd actually like nokia if it weren't for the symbian OS and battery life and the cum-dumpsters that go to other forums to trash other phones and lack the integrity to admit their phones own shortcomings.
i agree with you JOHNNY BOY !
i bought a 6230i ..the battery lasts 1 day at the max..its music software is boring .camera dont ask its crap! .
i Moved to a W850i
i NEVER regret buying the W850i ...
SE 4 LIFE!!!!
why should i admit n95 is better than k850. why? i hate nokia because i bought 6680 for 585$, i was really disappointed with it. useless battery, doesnt even last 2 days, and thats without music or FM. I was really brought down. And now its not even worth a penny. Nokia is a real crock of sh*t.