Maybe some people or a lot of people don't want to buy a D700.
If you want to compare phones at least compare the T230 with the x100 or something more similar.
That's of course if you've heard of any other phones other than the D700.
who cares about price ....price is worth the feature. T230 ....like somebody is going to keep it for even a year?
I bet they'll switch to another and to another low price phone frequently.
I'd rather buy expensive phone with great features (like mp3 feature). And they are worthy to keep it for a long while
Price differences from the D700 and the T230?..
I think the ratio for the T230:D700 would be something like 1:8-10 =P..
SE is slow.......... just buy samsung D700
BLUE TOOTH and also HAND FREE SPEAKER...
Go to these sites
This is a modification to go against newer Nokia phones rather than making their old one outdated...
There's a difference..
Loooks like a Nokia move.. another model derivative with slight changes.
Keep on cranking 'em out Nokia and Sony and Samsung... move the boxes, fix the bugs... move the boxes..
I have to mention i can't figure out why neither t230 nor z200 has wap 2.0 and IR ??? SE have had wap 2.0 even on t68i allmost two years ago. It just doesn't make sense.
Hmm...I guess they replaced t220 with t230..good move..4096 colors, java, low budget. Yet, it has to deal with great rivals like nokia's 2300 and 1100. :))))
T226 (US version of T220) is already out from Cingular. 512 Color display is much better than T300 ot T310.
...all nokia"s the same? shame
samsung 2-0 nokia
sony-ericsson 1-0 nokia
siemens 0-0 nokia
look at last nokia new white&black models ha ha ha bye nokia