hahahahahahaha... you say that comparing phone with features only... ok. Lets say if you buy N90 for $1000 then at one occasion you are just clumsy and drop the phone accidentally.. what would you expect? The phone to be in a good condition rite? you hope that you still can use it rite? or you just get a new phone afterwards.. ohhh how rich you are. that is just a complete waste on money if you do that. The fact is it is important to look at this small things too.
i dunno why you say that this phone has a worse camera.. but i know that this phone has a worse video recording, but look, i dun record with phones.. i would rather to get a cam recording with cheaper price and i can have the best quality ever. Camera in the phone is still acceptable for your own pleasure to be put as wallpaper in the phone itself and in the computer, 2MP is more than enough for this purpose. And HAVENT you read the comparison btw the two phones in this site? W800 rules!! even if you say that sthing wrong with the comparison, you still cannot trick the red color problems... N90 really has problems with that.
ONE last thing, this is often comes out from nokia user, who tent to be proud of the expensiveness of the phone. EXPENSIVE is not as good as u think!!!! CHEAP is good!!! if you are a wise person, you wouldn't want to spent so much just to get a phone!!! ppl tent to look at the cheaper price instead of going for the expensive one, DON'T you see that?
this is the best phone on the planet at this present time.. anyone who says different .. has not the pleasure of owning this first class piece of kit .... sony ericsson rules...mp3 player is first class and camera is good to.. yes the w800 rules ... wait till the 32gb cards come out ... ipod watch out..
well all I can say is that the SE W800 is in no way a competition to Nokia. Whats up with the orange colour??? Worse camera and recording features but wait it has a vibration effect...WOW. The only thing it has going for it is the cheap price. Looks cheap and is cheap.
The W800 lokks like a great phone but i'm wonderin wat the difference between it and the K750 is and if either of them is any better than the Nokia 6680,please help me 'cause i can't decide on which one to buy!
I wonder y ppl even compare if the handphone will spoil or not if dropped on the floor =.= damn lame.. u buy handphone is compare features not compare if it is more fragile than the other or not.. those who compare which phone is more fragile JUST DIE PLEASE!
one more thing.. yaser.. if the ring tone is loud enough but no vibration.. is that mean that you willl ALWAYS ring your phone? like in the church, in the meeting, in the class, in the concert or in watever important occasion?? you are rite... ppl will stare at you and think that you are SHOWING OFF!!!! c'mon man!! you don't want to embarassed yourself. be humble... its good to be humble.. not to show off.. have a normal phone with vibration..
i just read yaser's opinion in N90 forum.. in this forum he completely bash W800 in N90 he completely bash N90.. wth????
and in N90 forum he said that he bought W800??? ppl.. dun trust this guy by any mean!!!!!!
thank u SE supporter.. yea ur rite every phone just cannot have every feature otherwise theres no point of making more phones.. but n90 is nothing compared 2 w800 in that review.. in real life i have seen both.. they r close but n90 still wins.. but thats my point of view.. maybe sm1 else sees it different.. mayb not..
yaser .. im not sure if u r right about the camera thing but the review shouldnt be fake too.. anyway ya no handphone is perfect.. if they make a perfect handphone there will be nothing for the handphone industry to make anymore.. all the handphone companies gonna close down if they create a perfect handphone.. they purposely make handphones with some errors so they can make more phones in the future.. w800 got some difference compare to k750 just not much thats all .. anyway more better phones will be out but there will never be a 'PERFECT' phone..
hey sorry SE users but w800 isnt 'perfect'... n90 is much better.. im sorry 2 say but that review of camera quality is total crap.. ive seen both w800 and n90 pics in real life and n90 wins by quiet a long shot.. its video camera is also better but it has no vibration.. WHO CARES.. its tone is loud enough.. dj_ashtray.. if u think w800 would've been 'perfect' if it had 3G well why didnt SE do that? i dont get u SE users.. sony makes a million products whereas nokia is just devoted to mobiles.. maybe SE and nokia are the biggest brands but Nokia wins and it has it all..btw... w800 and k750 are very week.. my friend broke his k750 wen it fell from less than a meter on the ground.. it just proves y SE phones are cheap.. n90 is very strong and it has extra protection with its flip..
I'm considering buying this phone. One of my main concerns is to be able to sync PIM information correctly from MS Outlook... Things like categories for contacts are vital... can you browse your contacts by categories??... do alarms for to do's and meetings sync well??, what about the meeting notes taken in outlook?, and how well from items inputed in the phone to be added to outlook?... any help would be appreciated...
I think SE should have done more to this phone. I don't assume it as a new model, but just a "face lift" of K750.
Something that I think should be added are at least: an audio output jack, bulit in flash instead of LEDs, better speaker, EDGE,(I don't think about 3G, coz it's not available in my location)& stereo bluetooth head set.
If you can't take the time to look at the page on GSM Arena that gives the specs., how are you going to have the patience to understand the W800i at all? GSM Arena clearly says "RINGTONES - ,MP3."
No comparation between nokia 7710 and SE k750.. SE k750 is the definitive winner.
Of couse SE couldn't include EDGE and 3G on this mobile. That wouldn't be fair for other brand. If SE include this featurings in its mobile, the word "pefection" would be replaced by "w800". Just Imagine: Good-bye to nokia ;-). SE again did it.