btw JT iv its owt in d u.k i wud like 2 no ware iv u can provide a link myself an many overs wil b gr8ful
i live in d u.k an s.e was d 1st fone available 2 d public wiv auto-focus however on d continent (europe) panasonic did av a auto-focus fone out by d time we got d s.e but am sure dat samsung may av had 1 out in korea b4 dat coz day seem 2 b so far ahead ov us
ok, but still that's not an excuse, only bcoz d first one you saw or heard was a SE and its on your country doesn't mean you have to say Ericsson or now SE had the first auto focus on mobile phones. of course i have not forgotten all your other posts were correct like d bluetooth thing, in fact if you'll try to search this forum i said Ericsson was the inventor of bluetooth and no one can change that, maybe its you having selective amnesia.. in fairness, have you forgotten i said to you "...in case, accept my 'sorry'... so how can say that i should be more humble or respectful.. pls try to remember..
I didn't say "here in the UK" because, as I've already told you, I had no idea the Panasonic existed and was genuinely under the impression that SE did make the first phone with auto-focus because the first one I ever saw or heard of was an SE, and the first one released in my country was an SE (happy I'm saying SE now instead of just "sony" or "Ericsson" Mr Pedantic?). So, I was wrong about one thing. You seem to have conveniently forgotten that all my other posts have been correct. Big star for Viperkid cos he proved someone wrong. Well done! Shame you had to be so arrogant and nasty about it though. Try being a bit more humble and respectful towards others and maybe one day you'll have a life away from your computer.
battery life is great!
let us all be real not fake! like what some dude is known for by giving wrong information.
sorry typo error:
i meant "were" not:
..but never did you say before it was in UK that you "we're" referring to...
one more, that's "unfortunately":
..posted a matter you thought before is right but "unfortanetely" not!...
what could be the reason your posts are being deleted? i guess you can answer that very well, indeed.. but never did you say before it was in UK that you we're referring to (re first auto-focus function on mobile phones) everyone knows that, just now. again i did not say all your comments are baseless, what i said was some of your statements are just not true, like this first auto-focus thing that only now i knew that you are now admitting it that you posted a matter you thought before is right but unfortanetely not! if that was your real point, then you could have eloquently posted it "as far as UK is concern", right? the bottom line is: now everyone knows who is more credible between us. all i can say is "real" people wants "real information" not "fake information".
I left a long long post last week that was deleted before it even made the forum.
The long and short of it was me holding my hands up and saying that I'd based my comment about SE having the first auto-focus on the fact that SE released the first auto-focus phone here in the UK. I knew nothing about the Panasonic you referred to, and did indeed find it after a websearch. So unlike yourself, I'm man enough to admit when I'm wrong. Although you branding all of my comments "baseless" is bull, as everything else I've ever said on this forum has been correct. I based the auto-focus comment on the first to hit the UK where I'm a buyer for a mobile phone company so I was confident my info was correct. (and as far as the UK market is concerned, it was.)
I also posted links backing up absolutely everything else I'd said before (obviously except for the auto-focus thing). So Viperkid, you had me on one point. ONE. So why crucify me for making a comment based on what was indeed the first auto-focus mobile IN MY PART OF THE WORLD. I'm not Japanese. I knew nothing about the Panasonic. But the bottom line is you (very disrespectfully and offensively) branded me a liar, fantasist and said EVERYTHING I said came from my overactive imagination. Who do you think you are talking to people like that anyway? Climb down off your high horse for just a second and you may realise your no better than me. Or indeed anyone else. You really need to sort your attitude out or you'll spend the rest of your life in front of that computer screen cos "real" people will want nothing to do with you. I certainly wouldn't and I know I'm not alone there.
regarding maximum kbps W900i accepts in a MP3 file, (according to W900i's white paper-21 Oct 2005 edition) it says:
MP3 (192 kbit/s for local playback)
again here's the link:
so i think it can accept MP3 files with 192kbps.. btw, Nokia 8800 has SVGA camera and not VGA camera as what you said, here's a link:
REVIEW from mobile-review.com:
The device does not have advantages in comparison with Sony Ericsson K750/W800. Radio is realized much worse and less convenient; expansion of the software functionality does not allow speaking about "revolution". The size of the device is too large, even for the UMTS-device of the current generation.. it is much easier to choose smartphones by Nokia (the smaller size, greater number of options and programs, plus lower cost already today). The phone is interesting on paper, but, as well as any test it is of little avail in daily life.
link (also posted by striker):
correction, N80 has voice command!
(select N80, then click Technical Specs)
where are your links? you know, proving Sony Ericsson or what you said "Ericsson" was the first mobile maker who had auto-focus function on their mobile cameras.
Alrite just tell u guys 1 thing phones will never be perfect only close to perfect.. and if u like a certain phone BUY it.. u dun like DUN BUY it ... all phones got its pros n cons..
this phone is the best atm
but i still hoping w900 have WIFI :(
then im sure its the best phone :)
yes kazama it is a gr8 fone but no fone is perfect am sure dare wil b loads ov nokia fans dat wil b 2 hapi 2 baisly tel u but jus ignore dem iv u like d w900 den dats it
Sorry, this monring, I saw the "Coming soon" taken off from W900i on Sony Ericsson's website but it's back there again. I think someone may have accidentally taken it off. Sorry for the misinformation.
hrmm that guy said its out in SG no way.. it is coming but not now not yet.. it will cost around SGD$900.. 2yrs plan btw
an iv u consider nokia 8800 iz £610 sim free d w900 iz wel gr8 value compared 2 wot d 8800 az (no mem card slot, jus a vga camera)
dis is available £479 sim free, nt bad an aftr xmas it cud drop £50-£100, iv dats d case defo gonna by in da new yea
In the forum you said that the phone is out in Singapore.. how much does it cost?