What a marvelous. I can't believe that's like phone can create somebody.
hi sony. i use k750 dat was awsome . da sound quality is realy near to reality. dream sound and camera is also beta thn n90. n90 is s sucked beca of is huge price . i sold k750i beca of its stick problem. bt l8rs somebody told me its solution .bt now i got w800. and im waiting for w900
hi i m vicky from pakistan.i recently bought w800i but after buying it ,i came to know about w900 and i m in love with it coz it has a large 2.2"'screen as i love large screen so i want it badly.i bought my w8000i in 28000 rupees but i dnt know its price if sum one knows it do tell me,and other then tht i m waiting badly for its reveiw. an other thing is tht when is it releasin,tell me about new english mobile reveiw sites and one thing more ,Is memory stick available in its set like they gave in w800i?? .pls answer my question
i heard ppl said that this phone and N91 gonna have same price...so, which means this fone is gonna be really really expensive...but i also heard another verison..is that the price is gonna be about 550EUR...just wondering which is really price..
hi i m vicky from pakistan.i bought w800i few weeks ago but when i was surfing this site so i came to know about w900.oh this phone is far more better then w800 coz its screen is far bigger then w800,it has a video caller and it has a remote control as well .but it was supposed to be lauch till october but as we know october is over and we havent been able to get it yet and i m patiently waiting for its full fleged reveiw.wht i m worried about is this tht wht will be its cost in pakistan i bought w800 in 28000 rupees dnt know about it i hope its price is not more then 33000 rupees i hope so.if any one knows its price in rupees do tell me
Well, there is no meaning in comparing this phone with N90 OR N91.
THIS ONE IS NOT A SMARTPHONE,
is an exellent multimedia phone, it has the best sound quality and the best camera until now(but even in the near future better cameras come up,this one is eather way very very good!!)
Also, has a very nice screen.
If you need a smartphone,this one is not for you.Better go for P990 or N91.
But for me,who already have an ipAQ for my job, this phone is ideal!!And in general I'm against the smartphones coz they will never be able to replace Palmtops(small screens,weak processors,little RAM).
And I think it's beautifull also,what do you thing?Although is quite big
this phone is missing the opera 8 browser apart from this is best fone ever. i spoke to se other day and they say be avaible in january 2006
i couldn't be more undecided at the moment.
Between the N91 and the W900 there isn't a huge amount of difference. a couple of things are swinging me towards the N91 however.
If the N91 and W900 are priced similarly, the extra cost for a 2gb memory stick makes the W900 a much more expensive alternative.
The N91 uses the symbian OS. which in my mind is superior to every other manufacturers base OS. Windows mobile is the only OS that challenges it for me.
Visual radio. If you dont know what this is (it's not listed here on gsmarena) then take a look at www.visualradio.com for more info. basically it's getting closer to over the air TV broadcasts. Only the N series has visual radio so far that i've seen. Whether it takes off, or how long it takes to take off is another matter.
But other than those listed above the only real difference is the expandable memory on the w900. do a compare on both the phones and you'll see what i mean.
Incidentally the reason the N90 isn't selling isn't because of it's size. It's because of the cost. The w800 and D600 cameras are adequate for your average camera phone user. The advanced optics people dont really care about. And more to the point aren't willing to pay £150 more for the sake of a software update. Had the N90 been a 3mp camera phone (like the proposed N80) it would have possibly been worth the extra money.
But back to the topic...i think it's going to come down to price for me. If the N91 and w900 are priced within £100 of each other. the N91 wins it for me due to not having to purchase extra memory.
Hi! SE Group!!
I m waiting for W900i...
I just love SonyEricsson n i ve used all the recent Phones of SE...but...this W900i...has bundle of features which makes it
"Badshah of Phones" (King of Phones) and i m seriously waiting for it to be launched in india...
SE has already proved that it is the best...but now...
It is the Only best ..
I have actually held the nokia n90 maybe unlike most other people writing in this forum. It is an ugly brick which people will not buy for that precise reason. I have also owned a sony ericsson s700i as well, which was a big phone but its tiny looking compared to the n90. When it is fliped closed its as big as a 6680! ie when opened its huge! The camera although good on the camera is nothing worth shouting about, the w800i is just as good and the w900i will be the same if not better.
The design is the biggest flaw of this phone, you would be embarassed to carry this flipping brick around.
guys... ken2.5 , dom, invincible in particular....
1.)i also think dat... reviews bout comparision b/w n90 & w800's cam... was rather biased...coz i personally checkd pics from both the phones.n90 cam is way much better than the way it was reviewed here...though w800i is also gud.. both r equally gud.. but i donno for some reason n90 was shown as inferior handset...
2.)now coming to w900.sure dis it a nice handset.recently i went to a mobile expo..here in india(if any1's from delhi then s/he must know bout it) n there i saw this cel.. & n91...believe me guys...w900i look much better in pics on net.. while in hand.. it feels jus a regular fone...& n91 dat looks really weird in pics on net.. looks so.. sexy in reality..metallic body jus looks so damn sexy.
3.)w900 black version looks quiet plane.. but white version looks really good,bit ipodish tough...
4.) i askd price of w900 there.n they said bout approximatly Rs.35,000/- onwards.. n guess wot..n91 is also in same price range..which i comfirmed there..
5.)w900i 470mb in built + memory card, while n91 4gb microdrive + 35 mb memory... both in same price range.. plus.. n91 is a smartfone..
6.)SE fans must be saying "v can buy 4gb flash card, so 4gb harddrive doesnt matter".......but do u guys know wot wud 4gb card cost....probably equal to a mid segment phone itself...going by..512 mb card is bout 3000 rs....
7.)now.. jus think who's the winner over here...
also... im both nokia & SE fan...so my views r unbiased....
n guys stop fighting over whether nokia is better or SE is better...both r equally gud....so CHILLLLL.........
maybe because each time they compare SE and nokia, SE is better in that particular aspect. maybe thats why they say SE is better. in the sound and picture quality, no doubt that SE is better dude.
Stop being comercially brainwashed kids.
3G VIDEO CALL QUALITY:
No matter what 3g phone you use, the video call quality is horrible. It is jerky, slow, not clear, etx.... DO YOUR RESEARCH!
That is why T-Mobile USA is not rushing with this "so-called" " Third Generation Network"
and will fullu launch it by 2007 ( T-Mobile USA and I , we both hope that 3g video quality will be much better by that time!)
So if the video call is the main quality of this so-called 3g ( and to me it is the main feature and not the B.S. downloads!)then don't waste your money on 3g phone (If you are hoping to have at least 30fr per second video call).
If you are after 2mp camera and high quality MP3 player, than w900 is your phone!
i never said W800 has a crapy camera ! did i say that ????
no no.... i am se fan too and i love my s700\w800
but that doesnt mean that i have to say lies and say its the best of the best in everything !!!! right ?
if this editor is fair ... then can u please tell me why its always against nokia phones when it comes to comparisons with SE phones ???? why never talk about the sharp phones while everyone knows they are the best in camera field .... right ? :)
i am not saying SE is crap man ..... dont have ur own conclusions
guys SE W900I has a 8x zoom, dats what it says in their website, i suggest u all have a look at their website instead of looking at others before u make comments
come on guys post your opinions. i am not here to mock you, i am merely here to correct any incorrect statements posted so that there are no misconseptions and we understand what-is-what, and how-what-works.
are you telling me that you did the same comparison your self and found the results to be false. since this editor has been here for a very long time i can tell you that he is unbiased. his results have always been up to par. if you have any evidence that shows clerly that the w800 has a crappy camera and the n90 is superior, then i suggest you send in those pictures and prove us wrong.
we all know that you might find the results to be the same as the editor and you might ust switch it to prove a point. that review shows me all i need to know. and well remember digitall zoom ust magnifies the image that is seen. optical zoom actually changes the focal length of the camera and hence creates the magnification effect. that is why 20times zoom is so unclear and the nokia has tried a little too hard
It's true that the review about the camera test between W800 and N90 is wrong. In fact, N90 has a much better camera compare to W800. Well, i know some people might not agree with what i say, but test both the phones yourself, and soon you will find out that i am right.