Please stop wasting space by spouting rubbish . If you doubt GSMarena's reviews, why bother visitng this forum ?
In my opinion the SE walkman collection and K750i is a overall better handphone then N90 in terms of camera, vibrator mode , sound quality and screen revolution. Enough said.
dom i am sorry for calling you dorn, and which one of you think this invincible guy is wrong.
invincible yeah you
i would like to start of by telling you that we here are all not ust pure sny ericsson fans. we might of had the odd nokia 3310 so we have some nokia experience. we do not care whether our lens is made of plastic or not. if we wanted an expensive glass lense then we would ust buy a digital camera.
we are not saying that 20 times digital zoom is useless we are merely saying why would you need that if your scrren is just over 2 inches big. maybe when you look at it from your 24inch screen maybe then you will see that it is really necessary.
we here in this forum are not here to slander the nokia barnd totally. as you can see in the nokia n91 forum i spoke freely of how i felt but never said the phone was better or worse.
we all know that this forum is here to show our opinions, but if you look at the bottom as you write your message there are certain rules that you must follow.
how many times have you dropped your phone. everytime that happens with your phone, the phone may not neccesarily break. but your bank balance will drop as you have to buy yourslef a new lens. the nokia n90 is aa good phone, but SE w900i is better.
invincible you need to stop delving into the past and thinking of crappy phones. the n90 will never ever beat the w900. you need to update your browser and see that the n90 is history- HAVE YOU NOT HEARD OF THE N91. the n91 , you know. the n90's succesor.
you are the only person in this forum that needs to take notice and do more research. only the n91 is the w900's competition. the on may beat the other in certain places but if you put them side to side you will see the future of cellular technoplogy
Thanks for anwering ken..if your right..thats damn long!!!!......O and "other Dom"...change your name tolike dom1 or sumthing.. just so we can tell the difference..lol..thanks
im 96 percent sure im gona by this phone and you'll need a great letdown to stop me...but does anyone know for sure if it's gonna come out this year??.. And there's still one quetion unanswered.....how long can it record video at one go..i no it depends on the memory but does it keep recording until the memory runs out??..surely there must be a limit..like 10 mins a clip or 1 hour..anyone know??tnx
to the one that not put your name in the forum,
where do you get the facts about the hanphone VIDEO resolution is 320X240? is this confirm? i check at mobique.com and it stated 176X144 not 320X240
dom ur frinds in denial, he just wants his mind to fink that his nokia is betta the SE because he knows his missed out lol, tell ur friend to do this, tell him o sell the contract to some1 else and buy the phone on contract, vodafone gonna be the best traiff to get it on as they have talk for 60 pay for 3 or which ever service provider u want
dorn you are absolutely correct. SE is doing a wonderful obs with their cameras. samsung is merely trying to get people to think that a 5 megapixel camera is what makes a phone. the sony package will not let us down in any way. and 2 megapixelsa is sufficient for any computer or phone's screen alike.
At the end of the day, sony ericsson make brilliant phones, ok Phillips, and sharp have started doing optical zooms with 3 mp cameras, but that only matters if you want to look at your photos on a 40" monitor (2mp just about fills a 17" screen) so it doesn't really have that much difference on your actual phone. I really wanted the w800i, but its not bin in stock for over a month at the orange shop, and now the w900 is coming out ill have to jump to get this first otherwise ill never get a phone. Nokias are pathtic. My friend tried to say the 6680 is better than the w800i, i couldnt believe it. so i referred him to this site and hestill refuses to accept the 6680 is inferior.
i do not know exactly but if we were to go buy the same ratio of quality vs length, then i would think we would be able to get about 2 hours 6mins of recording
the phone will be released at the end of the year during the christmas dash in UK, China, and the US. soon after they will be delivered to all other countries where sony ericsson sells their wonderful phones
to open/acces the keypad all you have to do is push the bottom clockwise and because the phone has an auto assist funtion it will bring the key pad roun the other 90 degress
guys, i have to agree with what you are saying. this w900 is an absolutely wonderful phone. it is a wonderfuls succesor to the s700 and the w800. sony ericsson was just playing around when they made the w800. the w900 is a sign of what thay are going to do in the future. motorola and samsung try to compete with the w800. nokia thinks they can compete with th w900. we all know that the n90 can only beat the k750. sony ericsson w900 is the phone i am getting next. nothing in the world will stop me from getting that phone, well unless one of you nokia super fans(like invincible ha!) come and shoot me right now.
oh does any one know when the other manufacturers are going to start making REAL PHONES!
how do you get to the key pad is it the same as the w600 180 twist to open???
i have the W800i and it kicks ass! Looking forward to the W900i. can anyone tell me though if the camera for the W900i has a protective cover? the only thing i didn't like it was the swivel thingy. i was hoping it was a slider phone. AND that it would be 3megapixels.
Thank for anwerin'...but what i really meant was how long does it record at one go ??...like i no it can record for as much memory as you have but how long at one go can it record a video..like N90 (not sure exactly how long) can record for like 1h 40 mins in think at one go ..but what about the w900??
Its really like small kids comparing whose toy is better by arguing over between the W900 and the n90.
Personally, I think that two equally good phones in late 2005 or early 2006 would be the N91 & the W900...
whoops.. some more from me for invincible ~^^
1. It is confirmed that the video resolution is 320X240.. get ur fact rite before saying, IT IS NOT 176X220
2. N90's Carl Zeiss lens is already confirmed as FAKE. GSMARENA reviewed the N70's camera and they said it is BETTER than N90 although it doesnt have the Carl Zeiss lens. After all the Carl Zeiss lens in the N90 is just for market gimmick onli.
3. N90's 20X digital zoom is USELESS. U barely see anything with it. The best digital camera will not feature the digital zoom, even if they have, they are only up to 2X digital zoom only.. in fact, it never been used in practice. U will only use the optical zoom (unfortunately both phones still has not yet has the optical zoom).
4. both fones are 3G.. just like the guy before me said. They are equal (unless ur country does not support 3G)
5. N90 can twist and turn.. yea rite.. drop it from 1 metre height and u already lamenting ur fone.. That fone is absolutely fragile
6. i dun think that N90 can provide memory more than 1 GB (is that the limit for the MMC?) but with this fone u can have more than 2 GB. And the music quality is definitely better than the crappy-pathetique sound of N90.
7. Vibration.. well u might say that i shldnt bring this topic up.. but really.. what is the most important feature of a phone apart from the ability to make call?
The fone has to be able to tell u that somebody is calling u at any time!!! vibration held the main function for this. And guess wat? N90 miss it!!! wats the point of buying a fone?
8. I know that this W900 will be more expensive than W800.. but i believe this fone is still CHEAPER than N90--- this end the story of N90. The only nokia series that can compete with this fone will ony be the nokia E series. The new nokia fashion series dun even give any thread to K750.
9. The fact that you came all the way to this forum to say that N90 is better than W900 shows clearly that W900 threaten N90 to its death.. and it already happen ~^^ good bye N90.
great job aparadectos.. but next time dun even bother the invincible.. he already been looking for trouble in N90's forum and W800's forum and he keep insisting that N90 is best fone of the year of 2005 and 2006 which is IMPOSSIBLE and WILL NOT EVEN HAPPEN!! Just look by a single glance, there is no way N90 will defeat W900 and we all knows that.. even among nokia's fan ^^~ I already heard so many ppl complaining about nokia's new fone and they started to praise sony ericsson and they realise that NOKIA.. NO LONGER KING. SONY ERICSSON is the NEXT GENERATION FOR THE KING.
Nokia N90 is much better than this phone
-N90 has carl zeiss optics while the W900 has a cheap plastic lens
-N90 is a symbian phone and the W900 isn't
-N90 has EDGE and W900 has GPRS
-N90 has 20 x zoom and W900 has only 4 x zoom
-N90 video (352 x 288 pixels) W900 (176 x 144 pixels)
-N90 can twist and turn, W900 looks like a brick
-N90 is the phone of the year 2005
"guote by invincible"
Nokia puppy try not to be so ridiculus:
-tests on every site prooved that W800's ceap plastic lens make better foto's than ther fake Carl Zeiss N90 has and W900 will have even better cam than W800
-Java is more mature and easy to use than Symbian,SE knows better as it was the first company to use it
-both phones are 3g,u arguement is pointless
-W900 8x not 4x focus,
so as N90
-W900 has a 2.2″ 320x240 (QVGA) 262k color TFT screen much clearer than S700
-there arent any detailed official numbers on video resolution,but definitly not only 176x144,
estimations report double that,
but the sure thing is it has the best frame rate at 30fps
-i think u get it wrong look again on their dimensions to see who the brick really is,
(hint:the one wich must twist and turn to enter ur...)
in case u dont get it,
i ll giveanother hint,
i mean the one without vibration:-)
If N90 is the phone of 2005,
then the W900 is the phone of 2006,
invincible u have been beaten,