and also the EXMOR technology + the MULTI-TOUCH ALL-point.
Who needs SAMSUNG and LG? All they do is to COPY EVERTHING, and hooray you have a INSTANT phone.
I don't need a DUAL CORE to power up a phone.
And for the INFO. The advantage of ARC from x10.
-1st GEN QUALCOMM QSD8250 of X10 has 65NM compare to 2nd GEN QUALCOMM MSM8255 with ADRENO 205 GPU (graphics related matter) at 45NM of ARC means LESS power consumption due to lower NANOMETER usage.
Or if you have the patience you can wait for the 3rd generation of QUALCOMM with dual core CPU's. (who cares about DUAL CORE? A PHONE is a PHONE, and it doesn't need a DUAL CORE in it. Better use a LAPTOP for that matter.
-SUPERB design and lightweight
AND MANY MORE.
This will be the phone that will satisfy my needs, for several years.
Man man this is an opinion giving place dont go on fighting if u wanna fight get some chatting place
[deleted post]Arc has 8 mpx camera, a flash, Sony's Exmor R camera sensor, much higher benchmark scores than ur galaxy, a much better 3rd gen qualcomm processor, a reality screen which produces much more natural colours than ur stupid super amoled screen which produces over saturated & false colours, a phone made from premium material as compared to cheap plastic of ur galaxy, the most unique & the sexiest design in touchscreens as compared to iPhone copycat of ur galaxy s, a many times faster performance as compared to ur laggy galaxy s, a great battery backup(see the gsmarena preview of Arc) as compared to poor battery backup of ur galaxy s, the 1st ever phone with ANT+ support which allows u to connect ur phone with any of the medical devices & apps making ur phone a personal health hub, a great customization(mediapane & timescape) as compared to iPhone copycat of ur galaxy s(touchviz),
Latest gingerbread as compared to 2.2 & 2.1 on some galaxy s devices, much slimmer body than galaxy s, a powerful loudspeaker than ur poor loudspeaker on galaxy s, a full fledged HDMI output which allows u to convert ur TV's screen into smartphone screen on the go but ur galaxy s don't have that, the most advanced multitouch system in Arc which allows simultaneously 32 touches on the screen but ur galaxy s allows only 4.
U r stupid like ur galaxy s.
TMach, 22 Jan 2011Hmmm..interesting about the plasticy thing as the X10 is plastic but anyone who has actually e... more"SE has never done cheap, PERIOD! Personally, can't wait to own this."
i have to agree in this, when looking back at the phones we used 4-5-6-7 years ago theres no doubt the SE models were the best. I admit i was stupid buying mostly nokia those years, when SE was so much better. Units like k810i are still selling for amazing prices second hand, and W-series was always better than xpressmusic. SE is historically the very best brand, only HTC is up there close to SEs track records of great phones.
nick, 22 Jan 2011except the arc, other than gingerbread 2.3, has nothing over the galaxy s. absolutely nothingit has one thing over SGS; it will work correctly. No defective GPS or app incompatibility or weird slowdowns and no need for 3rd party patches. SGS is for geeks who love to patch and root and watever, coz out of the box it doesnt work well, updating to 2.2 doesnt make it any better. And thats same as samsung in the past, no will or skill to fix issues, and the socalled patches for the GPS is no more than a workaround in a failed attempt to hide the fact that SGSs GPS problem is caused by defective hardware.
Same bettery as xperia 10 and the biggest default in that phone is the battery power and they put it in the arc? you gonna be kidding me, arc is just xperia x10 with a new upgraded software, and all you people are getting sucked in to belive its a new phone, common guys, the media is playing with you. be smarter
Hmmm..interesting about the plasticy thing as the X10 is plastic but anyone who has actually ever owned one will admit that it feels like top quality, quite different to Sammy's galaxy. Again, the Nexus S is plastic but I doubt anyone can argue with the fact that it feels like a premium phone..scratch that, idiots always argue......
SE has never done cheap, PERIOD! Personally, can't wait to own this.
-too small internal memory
-no secondary camera
-camera lens is not in the best position
-TRYING hard but it can not beat N8!
abhi, 21 Jan 2011Arc is way better than ur stupid galaxy sexcept the arc, other than gingerbread 2.3, has nothing over the galaxy s.
I played with this phone at CES a few weeks ago. Although it does look good, it feels very cheap. Plasticky like Galaxy S. If it was solid like an htc, it would be great
Magnus, 22 Jan 2011Sonny Ericsson - Masters at screw ups. The last time I checked we're in 2011, yet this thing h... moreYou started to bash a phone just by reading the spec sheet? I dont suppose you mastered driving without any practice.
You comparing it to nexus one? Unless they are using same hardwares & softwares, even twins are not alike in every aspect.
Do you know you can install apps to external memory?
Try harder next time.
wooooooow sony ericsson is back on track with this design it looks amazingly pretty.
good design, 10 for sony :D
and for the hardware. it isn't too good even though it has 1ghz processor,but the enemy ,such as 'lg optimus 2x' which has 1 ghz dual core processor is a tough one for sony
Anonymous, 21 Jan 2011se -------- rock samsung --- rock motorola -- rock lg -------- rock htc ------- rock noki... moreAre you kidding me? Sonny Ericsson sucks! sucks! sucks! sucks!, can't say it enough. If you buy this thing, you would have bought yourself a nagging headache - RAM of only 512MB (unless the specs are wrong).