you are right....that is the differences between quantity(samsung) and quality(sony e)...
samsung..nokia..lg and htc too are now copying apple's technonoly....a very bad shame to a what we call a big company.....thats why apple are suing all this copycat company....plz advice me...tq
I think SONY really sucks they should just make the vaio series well vaio is not good enough in these days as there are good priced quad core ones but the point is that this phone is just overclorked with same battery capacity which will drain the battery life and thickness of the phone is ridiculous with no secondary camera. This is not even a mid aranged phone and the price of it is similar as SGS2 WHAT THE FCK SONY....R U SERIOUS? Moreover the CPU OMG no wonder why SONY is getting az rapd
What is that rectangulard shaped thing on the face of the mobile is it second
there is no secondary camera. the only difference between this phone and the first arc is that they upgrade the cpu form 1 gHz to 1.4gHz. Oh! and add new color.
Sony, I love you but stop following samcrap with the name scheme and focus on the specs for this phone. What happen to 1080p recording and a secondary camera? This ARC s has no wow factor for the $800 price tag I see slapped on it. I'll stick with my X10 and get a ARC until I see something better from SONY.
SE has done a great job with their new 2011 line ups of phones. There are few bugs and SE keeps releasing new updates to keep us customers satisfy. I own an xperia play and i already know I won't get another phone no matter the specs.. Unless it's the play 2.
The arc a looks promising though, probably the best use of the gingerbread os.
i plan to buy this great phone..
but, i want to make sure about something ..
how about the chrome on the side, is it easy peeling off after months usage ???
is the build quality on the phone is solid ?, especially on the back cover ..
please answer, who had xperia arc for months :))
Does this phone has a front face camera? because i really like it and want to get it when it comes out..
guys i dnt knw why u ask 4 a dual core processor and 4 for ram check out the performance of xperia acr n then say anything arc is just lil slow thn the sgs 2 n in some features its a tie in between thm if u dnt believe me check out by urself tht wts the performance of arc with 1ghz n 512 ram in front of sgs 2 with 1.2 dual core n 1gb ram here is the link
Anonymous, 10 Sep 2011sonyericsson have only a bug phones bad bad phones don´t buyhow can you say that? please be polite even you dont like Sony Ericsson or other brands. give more rationable and clearly reasons.
Guys please love se more than any phone in world, u no they re the best in the production of phone univasally [img]httpst2.gsmarena.com/vv/bigpic/sonyericsson-xperia-arc-s.jpg[img] (H)
hmmm...nice lookin fon,
for me, no sec-camera is fine, 1 ghz oso fine so 1.4 ghz absolutely welcome, only downfall is internal..SE shud come wit 1GB RAM at least n 2GB internal storage is gud enough for me, an external memory definitely a must..
Specs looks gud bt y no increase in Memory (320MB) n also no Dual Core lk other competitors?????? Is SE becoming the next Nokia????
oh shit where front camera it's nice mobile but doesn't have front camera...?????
Noel, 09 Sep 2011I really feel this phone still needs to be upgraded not from the looks but the performance wis... morehey frnd,8 mp is enough wen it coms to fotography.and y the hel we need 2mp scndry cam and huge internal memmory.while SE can surf faster.
Anonymous, 08 Sep 2011Yes, it has. The spec says it supports video calling, which means it must have a front camera.Can you please show the second cam to me?! There is no secondary camera...