May I know why is the battery Talk time mentioned is 6 hrs 30 mins whereas that's only for 3G and not for GSM calls??? For Gsm calls the talk time is 10hrs... GSM Arena's talk times are always for GSM then why such unjustice with X1??? Even the new Touch pro which has a slightly less capacity battery, has 8hrs. of talk time mentioned in the specs...
Please correct this mistake as this is very much misleading...
nick, 04 Jun 2008well htc made this so i dno what your on aboutno htc did not make this they are completly different companies they are like day and night. it's a disgrace and insult saying htc makes a sony product it's like saying hyudai makes mercedes-benz. htc is a taiwaneese company and sony ericsson is japaneese.
$ONY like no other, 05 Jun 2008Xperia will offer only 3 to 4 hour's of working time however talktime may last more or upto 8 ... morethanks for giving me the good info. greatly appreciated. I guess i'll keep on waiting for the Xperia. HTC's version doesnt have enough performance.
reaper, 05 Jun 2008Now X1 will be history with the arrival of the Htc Touch Pro...........HTC has destroyed X1 ev... moreYour wrong because the htc pro has de-activated many parts of its devices and uses a chipset that cannot support 30fps vga video recording which i really use so the htc is poorer in my study of UN-RELEASED specs to this date.
Also if you read spec s/e has got some input in x1,, i.e. it has track id app support etc and has much better support in after sales care where as htc support is bad..OK you may argue software updates support prove an infereior device from s/e but often these updates add better function or add more apps but in general if things go wrong you get more care from s/e than htc from numerous lawsuits and blogs around the net...I am not a huge s/e supporter cause have been using symbian for 5years or more with nokia and at moment using n82,,but,this device is a huge jump for s/e and looks an impressive spec provided its not like my p990i which was pathetic...Its because of p990i that i lost faith in s/e smarfones not to say that the p900 was excellant..
I want this x1 to be a hit because its got what i want in a smartfone and its blingy and pretty compact with a good battery...
Have got myself a palm treo 500v to get usd to windows again since past devices have been lobster 700 tv which was htc and the spv 500 and 550 which froze more than enuf to put me off windows but this treo is fast with 14 hr mp3 playback !!
I am struggling to find a cheap better mp3 player for free for treo with graphic equaliser etc....I also know its only the smartfone type edition not a ppc but in general it good training for £100 ,,but remember have been using symbian for so long its a challenge moving platforms but in the end its a more pro platform to use..
sony's touchscreen is by capacitors like iphone or pseudo touch like motorola A1200/palm tops?
if HTC phone is better than this phone so i dont complain about it because Xperia is the first step for SE but good for the first...about HTC, they have much experience for making WM phone so it's not strange if they are better..maybe you must image what Xperia X2/X3 look like later!!!
Bipin, 04 Jun 2008Guys, the Xperia is an MPEG4 player while Touch Pro specs says its only an MP3 player. But Tou... morei just want to help you what i know
you must know every devices have prices so you must spend your money for it..do you want to waste your money for useless devices ? i think you won't. Xperia and N96/N96 both of them have VGA VIDEO, N96/N95 has 5 MP camera but X1 has 3.2 MPs...In fact, the x1 is the best about it because X1 has WVGA resoluton screen(800x480=384000pxls), it means the screen can show pixels 5 times better than N96/N95 has (QVGA,320x240=76800pxls)..in other word although the phone has 20 MegaPixels camera but the screen only has qvga quality so amount of pixels to be showed on screen only 76800pxl so 20 MP is useless and wasting money foe the device.X1 has better life battery, processor, RAM and ROM than N95/N96 and also X1 use WM 6.1 OS it means x1 has microsoft office, has touch creen and qwerty keypad.x1 is the best for you
$ony, 04 Jun 2008Why you people are comparing AUDI (Nokia) to the BMW (Sonyericsson) in my opinion both brand a... morei didn't lie you, when i want to buy N95 the nokia seller showed a N95 video by it Tv output on tv screen even the TV screen size is 10"..i was suprised because the quality look horrible so i didn't buy it...According to my experience of it so i do dont believe you so much..well ok..maybe my opinion is diff with you...i dont want to push you for believing me...
HTC touch pro has smaller battery and also it lacks accelerometer. Xperia has larger battery and the accelerometer. Hope the software is really unstable upon release(like P990) so that its more affordable.
HELLO ITS ME.DANI.my w850 is better than x1 in any/every area.so u should rather consider n95/w 958.lamo lol
Now X1 will be history with the arrival of the Htc Touch Pro...........HTC has destroyed X1 even before its launch.............courtesy Diamond And now its Touch Pro to do further damage...........
Is this brick out yet? It has to be the agliest wm device HTC ever made - Just look at it.
Xperia will offer only 3 to 4 hour's of working time however talktime may last more or upto 8 hours but don't forget that it has WVGA (800x480) 3" display with touch screen a power hungry 528Mhz CPU 1500mAh of fuel tank do its job but power hungry features will eat most of it juice 2" QVGA display bring downs 1100mAh battery in just few hours so don't expect too much from 1500mAh battery also do you remember Nokia E90 it has 4" (800x352) LCD with no touch screen slower 330Mhz CPU (symbian don't need more than that) same battery but it use to last upto 3 hour's so u can expect only 1 to 2 hours more of working time on XPERIA also N95's TV-out is crap but video is good and N95 use ARM 11 369Mhz CPU with 220Mhz GPU the true power of ARM 11 is used by Nvidia APX 2500 GPU it is capable of recording 720p of HD video and supports HD tv out upto 720p via HDMI 1.2 But QUALCOMM chipset and CPU used in XPERIA is also very powerful.
Anonymous, 05 Jun 2008Well, just dont say anything for the sake of saying. Xperia and touch pro both have office ap... morejust answered my questio ealier,htc are up to something reducing video quality/grphics accelarater functions,,,its xperia all the way now
what the deuce? they finally posted talk time hours. wouldnt it be more with a 1500mAh battery. htc pro has a 1350 mAh and it lasts for 8 hrs. can someone give me the correct info
hey i was wondering if this phone has picture/ and text messaging? i also wanted to know if it has email? and how much is it?
Bipin, 04 Jun 2008Guys, the Xperia is an MPEG4 player while Touch Pro specs says its only an MP3 player. But Tou... moreWell, just dont say anything for the sake of saying.
Xperia and touch pro both have office applications and mp3,mp4 player as its always there in WM phones. Touch pro has a better RAM, that too just 32 mb but xperia has better processor. X1i has 7200A processor which is capable of recording vga videos @ 30 fps. X1a and htc touch diamond and pro have 7201A which can record videos only at qvga resolution. Check out the white papers for further info. So, xperia users from other than america can enjoy high quality 3d graphics while htc users cant. This is because of the lawsuit on qualcomm by broadcomm. In short 7200a chipset has a graphic accelerator while 7201a doesnt. Its software rendered.