Bw@e and Costello, the TV out of the N82 is at VGA. It also has UPnP also at VGA. Is it because SE X1 does not have these features that you are too stingy to give Nokia the credit? On videos recorded with the device the TV out feature gives great results. Try it and see for yourselves.
Oh yes, Bw@e there are many who are familiar with WM and cannot stand the OS. Just read the comments on GSM Arena's video about the SE X1. Remember that variety is the spice of life. One will always see differences in opinion and preference. So you ramming your opinions down people's throats will not change people's desires.
The card slot is compatible up to 32 GB, altough, there's no card with that capacity YET.
Compare it with nokia N96 with 16GB internal + card slot up to 8 GB... means the total capacity is 24GB
TdXS, for your information R1AN is right. One does attain pleasing results through the TV out and it is at VGA res. If you had a N82 you would know that; but alas you have neither a N82 nor a SE X1. All you have is biased preconceptions. As I have stated before video on the N82 is a good standard. Nokia could EASILY implement a bigger res screen but the cost of the device would sharply increase. Furthermore, it is not a business phone so viewing of charts, tables and graphs will be minimal. Since SE X1 is a business phone, viewing of charts, tables and graphs becomes more important. That is the advantage of WVGA displays. Little advantage is found in watching videos because QVGA gives satisfactory results. So people like Indra who go on and on about how videos will look so much better are obviously misguided and are buying the device for the wrong reasons. I cannot emphasize enough the need for graphic acceleration; the video drivers for the processor have to be enabled otherwise you will get sluggish performance. We are not even sure whether the HTC made SE X1 will do this. Afterall, HTC cynically ignored hundreds of complaints about the lack of video drivers for TyTN II which has left a bitter taste in many owners of the device. A WVGA screen will hinder rather than help a device that lacks video drivers. So it is foolish to be bamboozled by high specs without testing the device. Today's users are demanding and they hate slowdown. The SE X1 will have to be able to open apps quickly and to run graphics smoothly coupled to reasonable battery life. SE worshippers should take a deep breath and ask themselves whether they honestly think this will be a fast device. If they are sincere the answer will be a resounding NO!!
I hope that HTC/SE will suprise me. I am willing to chance it as a business phone as long as it is not tortoise paced! Yet my main phone ie my social/lifestyle device will be the N82 which has been tried and tested and proven itself to be the quintessential allrounder!!!
To get true VGA output with n82 you would need a graphics card!
On tv-out with phones with QVGA res it doesn't matter how high the quality of your video is,it will always look blocky when you play it through your N95,n82 on a TV.VGA quality my ass,it's nokia duping people yet again..upscaled qvga made out by nokia to be VGA tut tut
N82 has a QVGA screen but it outputs video and pictures at VGA resolution through its TV-out feature. This gives a very good quality viewing experience when you see videos in a TV through the N82.
HTC will announce some GREAT WM devices on the 6th of May.Handsets like the xda Diamond.Very feature rich,HSDPA at 7.2MBPS,proper High resolution screens,superb touchflo technology etc.According to msmobiles the handsets are going to be much smaller than PPC\'s of yesteryear.WM is on coarse to attract a new market.
Indra, your maths is seriously suspect! Look if you want to compare the N82's 2.4 inch screen with the SE X1 it is in terms of pixels per square inch. In other words it involves ascertaining the screen cross sectional area for each device. This can be done using Pythagarus' theory (although he himself plaguerised it from the Africans)! The result is that SE X1 screen shows only 3.54 times the detail in terms of pixels per square inch. So your statements have been inaccurate to say the least! The extra detail shown by the SE X1 will come at a cost which includes poorer battery performance, slower and laggy videos and speed of operation and higher cost. Nokia were wise to stick to QVGA res for the 2.4 inch screen because it produces satisfactory results. The VGA camcording when viewed on the QVGA screen looks OK. It is an enjoyable experience with NO LAG. The SE X1 screen looks better on paper but empirically one will attain laggy performance that will irritate rather than excite. Unless a miracle happens and HTC/SE enable the video drivers and they place a more powerful battery to handle the highly clocked processor, this will remain a dreamers phone. Great while dreaming but on waking and actually using it, a disappointment.
I heard that it's been sold in Europe already, is that true? Do you guys know how much would it cost? I see that it has 400MB of internal storage, and it is expandable through the microSD card slot, but up to what? How many gigas?
we have new Battles on this website. or shall i say forum.
Symbian vs Windows Mobile
Java vs Symbian
SE vs Nokia N-Series(lol)
SE Walkman vs Nokia XpressMusic
SE Cyber-Shot vs Nokia N-Series(arghh again)
Earth vs Mars
come on People No Phone is Perfect
@nokia & nokia
not yoy again.
Yeah lol 16M is cool, 65k is fool
65K is perfect for a WVGA Display like the one on X1
your ''xperia '' is very-very......slowwwwwww
don't compair with 16 m color.
16m is cool and 65k is fool........it is tru.
Let me take control here now.! Nokia fans with all this 16M and Crappy Microsoft stuff out.....
first off all
16M - Yeah it looks Great, but this X1 Has a WVGA Display for that size 65K is more then enough. its like a Computer screen on a Phone!!!!!!!!
Microsoft Windows 6.1 - Its Great if you can Use Windows on your PC and Laptop, the X1 will be just as Easy!!
so then Nokia fans. WOW 16M colour screen and WOWWW Symbian WOWOWOWOWW..
SE 4 Lyf.
cooooooooooool phone, this phone will be the best phone of the year.
Using Windows Mobile was such a shame for Sony Ericsson. I'm in love with Nokia since they didn't give a ... to Microsoft's crappy OS.
SE will fix lack of x1 before release it and the X1 you saw in youtube or video is prototype only.thanks
whatever the phone screen size, QVGA is Still QVGA or 76800pxl so 2.4" at qvga can't cover it and can't show vga resolution abilty of video. In other word, Wvga can show 5 times more pixel than qvga.(qvga)76800 : 2.4" = 32000 pxl per inches) and 3" screen at WVGA (384000:3"=128000 pxl per inches) in other word, wvga on 3" screen is 4 times better than qvga on 2.4 " screen. Look at Nokia N95 n N96, those phone have 2.8" screen at qvga, it means those phone have less pixel than qvga on 2.4" (76800 : 2.8" = 28071pxl!!).Wvga is great device that shouldn't be contradited by anyone. Xperia is in progressing...SE can shows just Prototype that doesn't has full power.Thanks