AnonD-257122, 14 Aug 2015$435....are you serious??yeah. were serious $435 for this phone? clearly an overpriced one. btw i have the means to buy this phone but for what i will get, its not worth it..
iloveSonyNot, 14 Aug 2015c5 is no match with vibe shot, lenovo is making its way to the top better than Sony the ovepri... moreyour right, Sony is overpriced, not what you get for. others do use high quality materials for a less price. Oppo is one of them
c5 is no match with vibe shot, lenovo is making its way to the top better than Sony the ovepriced not what you pay for smartphones
Anonymous, 12 Aug 2015Vibe shot is definetly much better, much affordable too. Sony is overpricedSony is premium brand not Low end cheap, you get what you pay for!
Vibe shot is definetly much better, much affordable too. Sony is overpriced
Anonymous, 10 Aug 2015So big...The 0.8 bezel great for one hand operate and you still have a big screen plus the mega selfie features & great pixels, what else do you want for a midrange? if you want small screen you can choose M5 the 0.25 second focus is the king of the mid range phone.
vipul, 10 Aug 2015it should have dual sim capacityhttp://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_c5_ultra_dual-7466.php
again,MEDIATEK6752? well,they choose for this could this be better than the Q snapdragon
Mickey , 06 Aug 2015What's use of "Sony Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2" ?Yah know its a bigger engine. Its not great on gas lol
Kinda funny to think most manufacturers couldnt put a high spec front cam on their flagship phones. Instead they put it on their mid range phones.z3,note4,htc etc has 2-5mp on their front cam. Whats the matter phone manufacturers?so St.pid!
Anonymous, 10 Aug 2015low specs in cameraDid u really said low specs in camera? U made me laugh...u r the one have a low brain specs lol. This is a midrange phone. 13mp is good enough. Front and back. The only downside here is the battery.