My friend is using this phone he is really disappointed with this bad camera and over all performance is not good also this is very costly can get oppo or vivo Samsung in this price range there is good products
Duraid, 28 Mar 2018Good mobile but a very bad cameraNot that much
It's a shame that a smartphone announced and released in 2018 and at this price range will not get the AndroidÂ™ version 8.0 (Oreo)
RAHUL, 13 Mar 2018your link is expired (error 404)Nope the link still works. Here is another link:
Don't buy this overpriced garbage. It will not even get Oreo. Source: https://support.sonymobile.com/global-en/xperial2/kb/801930740188bd387015e0fa244400032cc/
Nokia 3 received Oreo Beta but this overpriced Xperia L2 will not, despite the same CPU.
Anonymous, 18 Feb 2018I watched that video and what I saw? Note8 kills L2 easily for all aspects! Speediness, multit... moreThat video shows that a sub 200$ phone is right behind the performance of a 1000$ phone, the RAM management on Sony devices is amazing. It's obvious that the Note 8 is better, but it costs more than 5 times as much and the performance on day to day usage on the Xperia is not that far behind.
Anonymous, 18 Feb 2018I watched that video and what I saw? Note8 kills L2 easily for all aspects! Speediness, multit... moreyour pathetic L2 is low range of Sony and ur comparing with note 8? if u don't know anything better to search carefully before talking.
AnonD-481725, 18 Feb 2018Poor you, you probably was afraid to watch the video comparison or you actually did and it tri... moreI watched that video and what I saw? Note8 kills L2 easily for all aspects! Speediness, multitasking, camera. What are you try to say? Showing how much pathetic L2? Embarassing yourself?
I think this phone is not worth getting with the current price of over Â€200. I would wait until it gets below Â€160.
Anonymous, 18 Feb 2018You said Note 8 only two times better? Lets do comparison.
Snapdragon 835 vs MT6737T. MT673... morePoor you, you probably was afraid to watch the video comparison or you actually did and it triggered you, go here watch it again.
AnonD-481725, 17 Feb 2018When the Samsung Galaxy note 8 is two times better than this phone but for four times the pric... moreYou said Note 8 only two times better? Lets do comparison.
Snapdragon 835 vs MT6737T. MT6737T same as Snapdragon 617! SD835 vs SD617. 5x BETTER!
3Gb Ram lpddr3 vs 6gb lpddr4x. 3 & 6 = 2x, DDR3 & DDR4X = 3x. 5x BETTER!
HD IPS vs 2K AMOLED. HD & QHD = maybe 2x better, IPS & HDR10 Super AMOLED = 3x better. 5x BETTER!
Battery = same
20nm vs 10nm. Power efficiency was 2x BETTER!
S Pen, wireless charging + fast, fast wireless charging vs nothing. 4x BETTER!
Decent 13MP f2.0 pdaf vs Superior 12mp f1.7 dual pixel pdaf + 12mp f2.6 zoom & bokeh = that was 6x BETTER!
All I can say, Note 8 is 5 times better, not 2! Price is only 4 times higher, very worth it. Poor you man. Sony has no chance to beat Samsung. You can retired now.
AnonD-481725, 17 Feb 2018When the Samsung Galaxy note 8 is two times better than this phone but for four times the pric... moreYou feel it's underrated because you have no idea about the mid-range market.
L2, for example, costs 20k in India, while you can get excellent phones like the Moto G5S Plus, Honor 7X, and various other phones for under 15k, which are significantly better than the crappy L2 in every manner. What does the L2 offer for it's price? Crappy old Mediatek 6737T, low res display, subpar camera, ugly design. Nobody in their right mind would get the L2 for that price, when you can get significantly better phones for lower prices. G5S Plus, for example, has dual rear cameras, 1080p display, significantly better SD625 chip, and a lot more.
Yes, Sony's software is very well optimized and I'll give that to them, but the ancient Mediatek processor is too slow and that'll show when you try to play demanding games.
I get it that you're a Sony fan, but try to open your eyes and see. Even Sony phones wouldn't get this phone (unless you're a blinded diehard fan)
When the Samsung Galaxy note 8 is two times better than this phone but for four times the price, the L2 is a very underrated phone.
Taz, 05 Feb 2018Why should I buy Samsung? After two months this brilliant display will be covered with burn in... moreWho said? AMOLED doesn't burn in that easily. I've been using an A5 for over a year, display is still as good as how it was when I bought it. And manufacturers are finally making the move to AMOLED, including your beloved Sony. I hope your opinion about AMOLED will still be the same when Sony makes the move too.
i looked up the price point.. for $50 less and for $40 more then this phone costs.. you can get way better phones.. sony shoot themself in the foot with this phone.. Huawei Honor 7X , Huawei Honor 9 Lite, Sharp AQUOS S2 (4gb/64GB).. and lots more... all phones having at least 1080p displays.. and overall better specs.. and that is only in the US.. if you look around on the EU/India/China markets . you will see that this phone in this price range is unacceptable... Sony Xperia L2 is not more worth at this point, considering all the offerings.. is $150... at best.. that display is like a broken leg.. it drags the phone down... the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) cost Â€30, has 1080p amoled screen. better cpu/gpu.. or the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 for Â€160-Â€170.. which frankly also destroys the L2 in any aspect...
xperia L2 back body curve model used old of xperia S Lt26i model without transparant line lighting.
Taz, 05 Feb 2018Why should I buy Samsung? After two months this brilliant display will be covered with burn in... morePlease keep yourself updated. Modern OLED screens don't burn in so easily and this quad-core Mediatek-powered phone is more likely to lag than the J7 Pro. No one is forcing you to buy a Samsung. Just letting you know that there are much better alternatives out there for the same or lower price.