AnonD-58802, 18 Jul 2012look man you try to make this phone look bad when you compare it with high end phones this is ... moreSorry, one mistake occured when typing and unfortunately the time left for editing was finished.
The mistake is:-
And I am "not" going to draw all the features of high end phones to the budget phone.
Here I forgot to type "not" in the previous post. Now read it.
And as u guessed, I did not try to make untrue comments. Actually, I searched the web and found many websites telling that low ppi causes uncomfortable text reading. But if it is good as u said, then its good news from u to us all. Thank you.
AnonD-62906, 16 Jul 2012The screen pixel density is very low ~165ppi. It should be atleast 200ppi. U wl feel uncomfort... morelook man you try to make this phone look bad when you compare it with high end phones this is made for young ppl like me who want a phone with good specs at a low price which the miro does excellent job at it ppl who will buy this must have lower specs phone including the reslution i have a nokia c3 which have 320*240 on a 2.4 screen that has almost the same ppi denisty 167 and i have no problem reading text at all if you want to male bad points about good phone dont make untrue ones
plz Think before u tell against others. Friend, I am not going to show this phone as a bad one. I am also eager to buy this phone. But we have to discuss pros and cons of it to guess its performance. And I am going to draw all the features of high end phones to this budget phone.
As u know, its a smartphone, everyone claims this. Then as usual, it should support multitasking(e.g. able to minimize programmes as it is the nature of smartphones). So I only want to know that is this phone capable of minimizing upto 5 programmes at once. And yes as u questioned, other low end budget android phones support this multitasking, e.g. Samsung Galaxy pocket, y etc. U should know this. Then where's my fault? Plz take everyone as u r. Friend, Don't try to neglect other.
what your problem man. i read all your comment. from first you try to make this phone is a bad phone. if you dnt like it then go find your phone from crap like apple or nokia. if you have money then you buy high end phone. this is low budget phone. there is so many people cant afford hind end phone. and miro give all this function on such a low price. what your problem then man. and your comment about doing multitasking. can your other low budget droid phone from samsung or htc do this kind job. if yes then then tell. other wise dnt say a word. and all the other user who against this phone please compare with same price range. dnt compare its with higher budget phone. if you do then i say no 1 tell you to buy this phone. here are so many user who afford this droid they will buy.
AnonD-62906, 17 Jul 2012Now I am confused about its multiplarty. Is this smartphone capable of running upto 5 minimize... morewashim i also think so i watched almost all video reviews and i feel lag over miro"s ui 800 is not enough
Now I am confused about its multitasking. Is this smartphone capable of running upto 5 minimized programs at once and smoothly withou being hanged? It only runs on 800mHz single core processor with ICS. What u say guys?
Now I am confused about its multiplarty. Is this smartphone capable of running upto 5 minimized programs at once? It only runs on 800mHz single core processor with ICS. What u say guys?
IanZone, 16 Jul 2012Nice design what worries me is the processor speed (800MHz) and the fact that they will releas... moreThe more important thing than specs is the software optimisation.live with walkman initially had gingerbread so it was more stable on it.
As u would know any preinstalled software is more stable than the software that arrives as an update coz it is better optimised for the device.
Miro won't not fly on ICS as gs3 but it does a gud job probably better than walkman due it's better optimised software for ICS.
AnonD-63223, 16 Jul 2012The only 2 cons i found in this phone are:
1.Adreno 200..it should be atleast Adreno 205.Th... moreWhat u don't understand is that nokia only has 1 resolution 640*360 for all it's symbian devices weather small or big.A 4.0" pureview has the same resolution (640*360) as on any symbian budget device and it's resultant ppi is 184 which is bad for such a highend phone.
And processor is indeed important.The 680 mhz processor on n8 is a primitive arm v6 processor.a 600 mhz arm v7 processor on desire c is much more capable than it.an android device requires much more processing power than symbian.
The resolutions r somewhat fixed(hvga,wvga,qhd,hd) u can't just demand a phone of a fixed ppi.if 190 ppi mark is most important to u then go for similarly priced xperia mini/pro which has the same hvga resolution but a small 3.0" screen resulting in ppi of 192. and also has adreno 205 gpu.the resolution after hvga is wvga(480*800)
If miro had wvga resolution, it would give a ppi of 280(same as xperia u)better adreno 205 gpu n better cpu then price would be 15-16 k.then u'd say it's expensive.
If u want better specs then u have to pay more.as simple as that.
shoaib, 16 Jul 2012what is the price of xperia miro in bangladesh. It still not available in Bangladesh
@Sony Miro : i thinks not bad enough the pixel density from MIRO. You can see Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus have 320 x 480 pixels too , 3.65 inches (~158 ppi pixel density... Miro still better....
The screen pixel density is very low ~165ppi. It should be atleast 200ppi. U wl feel uncomfortable to read text, webpages for a long time. And it also indicates less picture quality! Its very bad in this sense.
The only 2 cons i found in this phone are:
1.Adreno 200..it should be atleast Adreno 205.The processor doesnt matter much..its 800 Mhz is good enough.even N8 had 680 Mhz processor.
2.Screen resolution(165 ppi)..480x320..Bulshit..man why dont they understand..only Nokia is good in this thing..
It should have been around 190 ppi.
Other than these two things the phone is freaking awesome..I'm gonna buy this phone for sure.