Three things that i dont like in Sony Xperia S are:
does not have removable battery,
does not have expandable memory,
uses micro sim card.
best mobile ever sony rocks again... damn cute.. ya 300% better than galaxy sII
Well, I should say I am a big big fan of sony, no matter what products they come out with (blindly)....and the one reason is even their rubbish products look great and performs decently compared to other brands......m not exaggerating here, but from personal use of lot of sony products which I own...and haven't been disappointed with a single one...hats off to sony for their design and aesthetics...the new sony xperia s is sure to rock going by their specs and the looks..rest assured, i will be the first one 2 pick it up from the stores when launced in india
roughly it will have same gpu perfomance with arc s,reason? it have more 1.5x pixel than arc s but still at least it will have better perfomance
for people who compare this with samsung
sgs 2 super amoled plus is clear winner here,just look at arc s lcd vs super amoled on sgs
for people who compare this with sgs2 gpu mali 400 :
mali 400 sucks cos it render in 16 bit thats why it very fast on benchmark, still the perfomance are not that good in real world... using chainfire 3d playing tegra2/adreno and power vr games on sgs 2 some of them lag and in term of visual 16 bit is little ugly
I own a samsung galaxy s2 ....and its a good phone ..........but after reading xperia's specs ,, I AM IMPRESSED by SONY ........!!!!
Please launch faster .I really want to use these kind of phone.Mr Sony , I'm very proud of you.
Xperia S might arrive on 30 January in the UK. http://tinyurl.com/7g67d2y
I don't see any explanation weather Sony Xperia S does support 4G network?
adreno 220 GPU on this device is 2 times faster and better than Mali 400 which in SGS2.
what are you guys talking about??/
The gpu on this phone is much better than the one in sgs2. I own sgs2 and i regret that i bought it. it lags to many times. But dont forget that the display of xperia s has 720/1280 pixel and much higher pixel density then compare to sgs2. so even if you put mail-400 it will still not have a easy time.
777, 17 Jan 2012Compared to Arc S: Much lower 3G connectivity speeds,No expandable memory,supports only global... more"run a Jurassic age Adreno", meaning what exactly...Adreno 220 is the latest (2011 release) Qualcomm GPU that pushes the limits of the GPU much further. I just can't stand biased reviews and bashersl. Give at least some sort of credible backup to your claims before you burst it out. Just for your information - http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-mali-400mp-gpu-and-vs-adreno-220-gpu/
Looking at those specs make me think damn my phone sucks I really need a new one ;)
Compared to Arc S: Much lower 3G connectivity speeds,No expandable memory,supports only globally unconventional Micro Sim. Both have no Gorilla glass,limted to 1.3MP front facing,run a Jurassic age Adreno isntead of the Usain Bolt age Mali400,displays are poorer than Super Amoled,B.Tooth v2.1 + Qualcomm MSM8260 Snapdragon r outdated_shud b like BT 3.0 + Exynos atleast.So d SG2 wins, followed by ion and lastly Xperia S.
Those specification need minimum 2000mAH.
Surely we need to charge the battery twice a day....