"Having a multicore CPU means that the processor can work on more than one problem at a time, or it can work on a large problem more efficiently..
On the whole, a system with a faster dual-core will 'feel' faster in day-to-day work, but the quad core will reward you when you multitask or the more esoteric/scientific your work. This is of course, a generality, but it generally fits.
When you have a single task that needs to be done right away, multiple cores can help you by breaking the task into smaller chunks, working on each chunk in parallel, and thus you'll get your work done quicker. An example of this is the 3D rendering of a still image.
In day-to-day tasks, both will seem similar, or at worse the quad will seem slower than the dual at an earlier stage in its useful life. Meaning as the quad and dual cores both reach near full capacity the quad will be better equipped to fun more efficiently."
AnonD-20461, 05 Sep 2012samsung fans said quadcore can do multitasking smoothly, ok maybe yes but i think that is depe... more'there is no reliable reference to prove quadcore of S3 can do multi tasking smoother than dual core krait'
there is reliable reference to prove the dual core krait can do multi tasking better than the s3
google dual core cpu's vs quad core cpu's and you will find your answers and thousands of reliable references
AnonD-20461, 05 Sep 2012samsung fans said quadcore can do multitasking smoothly, ok maybe yes but i think that is depe... morebtw you really should put a 'I should try to' in front of your nickname.. its much more fitting
AnonD-20461, 05 Sep 2012samsung fans said quadcore can do multitasking smoothly, ok maybe yes but i think that is depe... moreagain,, go have a look at the sgs3 US version (using the s4 dual krait) and check out the benchmark section comparing it with the international version of the sgs3.. you will see that there is virtually no difference as the review again states.
sony fans must accept that statements like Xperia T dual core can beat S3 in every aspect are incorrect
AnonD-20461, 05 Sep 2012samsung fans said quadcore can do multitasking smoothly, ok maybe yes but i think that is depe... morelol now your just making things up LOLLLL come on bro i can do better than that
your hilarious!!! your completely lost in your agrument.. you will downgrade the s2 to a dual core ok fine.. but the dual core a9 does not exist lol
the US version of sgs3 is equipped with the s4 krait dual core
yes the quad s4 krait will obviously perform better than the s3 which i have said lol but pretty sure the xperia t is a dual correct?
samsung fans will say.. nooo not just samsung fans, anyone that knows about cpu's/ benchmarking will say it too... even gsma states this :)
once again i will quote from gsma "The US version of the Samsung Galaxy S III is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset with two Krait CPU cores, clocked at 1.5GHz. Due to its newer architecture, Qualcomm's latest creation performs on par with quad-core chipsets from the previous generation"
i will use your words now... are you not satisfied enough????
samsung fans said quadcore can do multitasking smoothly, ok maybe yes but i think that is depend on perfomance of each core
there is no reliable reference to prove quadcore of S3 can do multi tasking smoother than dual core krait
back to benchmark result
as you see, quadcore of S3 is weaker result than only dual core of krait, then samsung fans will say " the Benchmark's dont make use of the multi-core architectures">>>
ok to be fair i will take and raise the T krait to be quadcore same as s3, the result score of xperia T krait quadcore will be higher than T dual core krait in benchmark so it means that score will be far better than S3 even s3 score cant reach krait dualcore score
what else ? are you not satisfied enough
i will downgrade quadcore of S3 to be dual core same as xperia T core number, the result of S3 dualqore type will be weaker than samsung quadcore it self, it makes xperia T krait dual core to be far better
samsung fans must accept the fact that Xperia T dual core can beat S3 in every aspect
[deleted post]lol!! is someoneee tyring to get rid of any posts possibly stating why the xperia t may not be better??
haha come on admit ittt :)
all good bother.. i am in the sony forum
ignorance is bliss
[deleted post]im in the sony forum so i will let you have your glory ;)
plus points of xperia T over s3 are here.1.better performance. 2.a decent and powerful exmor 13 mp camera.3.playstation certified.4.great looks and compact size.5.good build quality.so,xperia T is clear winner.and s3's shinny back gives a cheap quality feeling.
i feel that the only thing missing in this phone is an ips screen technology found in lg, htc, iphone. because display angles are important too. may be colors look best in sony but that should be combined with wide viewing angle technology. once done that sony will soon become king of smartphones.
its battery is non-user accessible, this phone won't be sold , the xperia TX is with same specs and and its battery is user accessible and its thinner too
Anonymous, 05 Sep 2012hey if that makes u feel better, u run with that :)Okay,,now we are friend,,the fact is in my opinion that qc was better it can handle multitasing smoothly,,and it has disvantage,,so whatever it goes,,its depands on people want to,,coz its their money,,dont you??
AnonD-69912, 05 Sep 2012Well,,im feel guilty on you,,so sad i hear that feeling on you,,haha,,hey if that makes u feel better, u run with that :)
AnonD-69912, 05 Sep 2012The matter of fact and painfullnes that cannot accpet the reality,,,so sad i hear that,,im rea... morereally? thats weird because i had the same feelings for you guys :)
and i will quote again from gmsa "The US version of the Samsung Galaxy S III is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset with two Krait CPU cores, clocked at 1.5GHz. Due to its newer architecture, Qualcomm's latest creation performs on par with quad-core chipsets from the previous generation"
on par.. meaning .. same, equal, equivalent to etc..
whos not accepting reality ?? ;)