the reason it's expensive is it has the BEST back and FRONT camera. It may have a small battery capacity in terms of MAH but it has the "Qnovo battery tech" plus battery management software of sony giving you a still powerful battery performance. It is clearly ahead in camera and battery aspect justifying the premium price. The midrange processor wont lag your phone so it doesnt matter even it doesnt top the Antutu chart.
A no nonsense phone by Sony ... This phone wud b awesome for all Sony lovers. . specs are decent .. Even if some specs sound low ball on paper .. Trust me Sony knows to use stuff to its full potential . The LITTLE.big configuration of snapdragon 650 is amazing a72 dual and a53 quad ... Its perfect for above mid heavy users .. With the xperia x if at a reasonable price Sony can get back into the game
Anonymous, 25 May 2016 You are not a fool if anything over on that its you.....Now a days even low cost chineese p... morebig capacity is good but when it comes to charging time its not good over the 2620mah...and the usage i cant tell b/c some phone with 3000mah dont even last for a day like the sam note4 of my sister it has 3220mah she use the phone evry morning 7am and then she charge the phone 2pm sometimes 3pm and she charge the phone like 3 to 4 hours what the? while my sony zr and lenovo a680 only have 2000mah to 2300mah the charging time 2 hours and ready to go...and my sony sola lol i woke up yesterday at 11am my sola got 1% batt until now its 2.31am and its still alive lol...:-D
This product by Sony is really wonderful...
By reading all -ve n +ve comments, I'm more n more alluring to buy this.
Ya but the fact is, lt is too expensive... 😊
gaaron, 25 May 2016O oh troller hre...what are you talking about dual core and quad core bro?...i think your post... moreYup
Just look into the review section comments.
Tons of trolls without any tech or software knowledge, repeating same nonsense bull over and over....
Its unbelievable, and indicative of certain things
PkjPatil, 24 May 2016Quality in terms of what? The most valuable assets of sony(with ericsson) were camera and soun... moreAnd they are still at it, X camera is better than S7, htc10 and g5. Selfie camera too
Sound sytem produces high quality stereo sound up to 61db, whilst htc10 with same quality mono sound gives out 62db...about monospeaker phones sound quality I dont even want to comment, they are higher in db but lower quality sound....
Bawa, 25 May 2016Two things 1st battery is terrible it must be 3000mah. 2nd its dual core not Quad core. The... moreO oh troller hre...what are you talking about dual core and quad core bro?...i think your post should be in aple forums... If you are talking about sony x its hexa core 6cores jezz...
1st battery is terrible it must be 3000mah.
2nd its dual core not Quad core.
These two thing are big hindrance to make it popular and sure that price is high which is not good.
gaaron, 24 May 2016Yo! Bro you like large capacity batt? Go bring car battery together with your phone it will s... more
You are not a fool if anything over on that its you.....Now a days even low cost chineese phones giving 3200-3500mAh battery capacity.......Atleast giving that specification its helpful for marketing....now a days customers looking battery capacity camera memory etc....If anybody says our phone have battery backup like car or lorry,customers attracting to those.....
Vishnu Aranmula, 24 May 2016Li-Ion 2620 mAh battery........i think its not enough..because of the battery Xperia X is not ... moreYo! Bro you like large capacity batt? Go bring car battery together with your phone it will suit you bro...:D
Li-Ion 2620 mAh battery........i think its not enough..because of the battery Xperia X is not competetive
very well explained about Sony,
i always liked sony but these days they are offering nothing new except old mobiles in new packaging.
the most pathetic thing is the update part ..mobiles never get any updates and even if they do they do it in ages.
Anonymous, 23 May 2016Sony is expensive but high quality. If you don't want it - buy Samsung with low quality.Quality in terms of what? The most valuable assets of sony(with ericsson) were camera and sound quality. Sony now literally sucks in camera and sound is pretty standard in all devices. Another quality of sony was screen, now they can't compete AMOLED of samsung.
P.S. Whenever I see sony flagship my eyes lit. But what's underneath is really disappointing.
Anonymous, 23 May 2016Sony is expensive but high quality. If you don't want it - buy Samsung with low quality.Not a samsung fan but have you even seen what samsung S7 & S7 edge can do if not please check it. those phones are way much better that xperia x(not xperia x perfomance) which costs as much as they so better check it before saying. if xperia x costs 40k-50k which is expected then what will be the price of xperia performance 80k!!!!!!!
Sony xperia x & x performance are good phones but at what price Bro?????
And still If u think the cost is justified then pls buy one for me.
With that expected price, oh!! sorry highly overpriced, it seems sony has made up its mind that it will close down mobile phone division like it did with laptops.
Specs are nearly same as of redmi note 3 expect camera(sony has better camera) and battery what it asking is 50k in indian rupees, they must be out of their mind or they really what to shut it(mobile division) down quickly.If they think these specs are worth nearly 40k-50k then are others wrong or running in loss, instead it is sony whose is loss. after all this if they know that their hardware is better that other then just show it. But current tactics is leading them to their doomsday which I think is not far. I wanted to buy but at this ridiculous cost no freaking way. Better Wake up sony or its done.