Avand Rd, 21 Mar 2016Uh.. When Xperia led in DXOmark.... Sony is the BEST, photo quality is SUPERB, its untouchable... moreDxo is and always will be a refference...
In discussing camera quality with a bunch of you guys only a refference site is viable...
Cause you dont seem to care for anything more in debating.
And thus S7 is n1 by automode measurment, by a point.
What good is bringing extra camera factors into a debate, for ex highest ISO in a smartphone camera, or a fact that low EV level preserves most detail in 23mpx mode and negates the raleigh effect at that setting, when it is of no use here, guys like you dont even acclaim it as an advantage, you do not understand it, you dont even use the damn camera...
I did try that so much in the past, made a dozen linked photo comparissons that I personally made, but with no avail.
I just gave up after some time
So Avand and alikes, just dont even start on that here...
S7 is best as dxo mark says, I agree
I reffered interested parties to Flickrs pro photographers analyses of mobile cameras, so if interested go check their conclussions.
If you dont care what more people with pro experience have to say on the subject, then dont...
Its that simple.
why is it that this another flagship of xperia x or z series does not enhance battery life (mAh)? & RAM?
[deleted post]Uh.. When Xperia led in DXOmark.... Sony is the BEST, photo quality is SUPERB, its untouchable, automode is best method.DXOmark is the most reliable site.
You dont talk anything about exif setting, pro mode etc...
Now another device leads. You said its photo quality is HORRIBLE, the automode is BAD method. ????
I dont really care of it btw, i am not trolling. Just having fun.
ICE, 19 Mar 2016You clearly battle to use the compare tool. First look for the small interactive green rectacl... moreThat is postprocessing, not lense blur...troll.
There is NO lense blur you keep ranting of, no matter how much you try to turn the subject focus around...
Furthermore, you should compare shots within same exif setting to compare real quality, meaning same ISO, same mpx, same shutter speed, same white balance
Not automode settings
Do not be lazy, there are people there posting comparissons of phone cameras with same exif settings on sites like Flickr.
Where real pro photographers ( not opinionated fanboy folk) praise even old xperia z1 over galaxy s7 camera capabilities...
But I am certain you dont care...
Evenly enough, we that know sth about cameras, dont care about rants of fanboys like you
Based on DxOMark Labs for Mobile phone cams Samsung galaxy S7 Edge which has been announced 6 months later after Sony Xperia Z5, it has total score 88 points with only a point ahead than previous Sony Flagship Beast. if you are looking for premium quality and a real unique performace simply go for SONY.
AnonD-122669, 19 Mar 2016I see some people complaining about the bezels of this phone & want them reduced as much a... moreVery true. We love big bezels. But Sony needs to take the Bezel King Crown back from Apple first. X Performnce is a step in the right direction. Hopefully their September flagship will have bigger bezel than iPhone 4.
when this phone will be avaleble in saudi arabia please.
i am waiting this phone
use less not have a infrared port... for sony you must more innovation again for smartphone like samsung
Tann Hauser, 19 Mar 2016Dare to show your delusions on z5c and z5 in compare tool? You clearly battle to use the compare tool. First look for the small interactive green rectacle on the iso 12233 image in the left screen in the camparison window. You can even click on the colour chart next to it, move the green rectacle down to the pink fluffy ball. See how disgusting the quality is from a z series camera, now compare how clean the fluffy ball is against a 950. The 950 has far better edge quality compared to z. Done and dusted.
Reading the White paper regarding X Performance I couldn't find water resistance IP6x.. While in Z5 paper there was IP68! Also on their site.. It seems Also no 'two days battery life'.. At this point, the X is a better choice for battery life and storage (64gb)
I see some people complaining about the bezels of this phone & want them reduced as much as possible. Well, I woud like to point out that bezels are important to hold the phone horizontally while taking pics/video or playing game or doing anything in landscape mode basically.
I have Z3Compact & while it almost perfect with its small size, the small bezels mean that my fingers covers camera when I try to take a pic quickly & I have to change my grip. Also, part of my palm brushes the screen or pulls out notification bar while playing a game or watching the video.
So having some bezels is necessary.
Tann Hauser, 19 Mar 2016X is pointed at 600$, A9 at 630$...
Point is, you are biased against Sony..
I am sorry you ... moreI am not biased for or against any company, I could care less about the companies, it's devices I like or not. I keep explaining this to you, but you keep failing to grasp the point.
If the A6 2016 (silly name) turns out more expensive that the Xperia X, well that in itself is understandable, it has a bigger screen and battery and better processor after all.
But the simple fact is, if these devices are to be considered mid rangers, then either of them launching at anything above £400 at the most, is nothing but an absolute rip off by both Samsung and Sony.
Lex79, 19 Mar 2016I'm sorry, your showing me the spec sheet of the A9 (2016) ?????
A device that as yet has n... moreX is pointed at 600$, A9 at 630$...
Point is, you are biased against Sony..
I am sorry you do not see the logic
Lex79, 19 Mar 2016And here is the petty troll accusation.....pathetic!!!!
I dare call you a hypocrite Tann...... moreDont credit me with any of your opinion
We will certaily never get along in opinions ;-)
Tann Hauser, 19 Mar 2016Are you sure there is no midranger more expensive than X :
http://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_ga... moreI'm sorry, your showing me the spec sheet of the A9 (2016) ?????
A device that as yet has no price that I can find in the UK, and also one that if does launch at anything above £350 then I would advise people avoid like the plague (neither would I consider it the best option at that price).
So whats your attempt at a point with this????
Tann Hauser, 19 Mar 2016"Brand obsessed surf..."
Taken from a fella that bought a s7 device before any ... moreAnd here is the petty troll accusation.....pathetic!!!!
I dare call you a hypocrite Tann....because you are one.
I may pre-order anything I like the look of, if the S7 didn't live up to my expectations, well I have 14 days to return it, no questions asked, which I have done in the past with many devices from many different oems (the Z5 included).
With you though, it's Sony, Sony, Sony and only ever Sony, as such, you daring to label me a fanboy, makes you the aforementioned hypocrite.
Not that I credit you with the intellectual ability to understand that logic.
Lex79, 19 Mar 2016Perhaps, perhaps not, like you said we'll have to wait and see.
But for right now, accordin... moreAre you sure there is no midranger more expensive than X :
And from your own favourite brand even, fanboy ;-)