How can XZ premium score only 83 in dxo , when even a year old X performance scored 88?? Given the video stabilisation of Sony is far Ahead of the competition and every review rate XZP a good camera
Tann Hauser, 22 Sep 2017Have you seen the dxo scores for iphones 8 already? One guy already caught the cheat....photo... moreAre you thick in head or what? Read the last paragraph of the dxo review x10 times (just above the comment section). I'll understand completely if you don't accept or understand the facts presented by the pros at dxo. Go look for more excuses...
Khaled Seoud, 22 Sep 2017no phone tops the XZ Premium beast in the ppi yet.XZ Premium is cHaMp!
Tann Hauser, 22 Sep 2017No doubt some people will love "the new protocol" and change in editorial. B-) Have you seen the dxo scores for iphones 8 already?
One guy already caught the cheat....photos processed through adobe.
Guess apple found a new way to "conquer" competition... :-D
i..O.U.F.A, 22 Sep 2017Any one know a phone with a higher PPI pixel density than what this phone has?no phone tops the XZ Premium beast in the ppi yet.
[deleted post]And u know what that means...a review for it is coming......get ready for the performance u gonna get for that resolution
M7, 22 Sep 2017When recording 4k video in this phone there's an option that says recording file type H.264 &a... moreIt's video encoding standards, h. 265 (HEVC) is newer and compresses the video file much more than h. 264. A lot of tvs don't support hevc, so dependent on where you want to play the video there's a choice. If you're using a computer or phone to play. hevc wins.
Anonymous, 21 Sep 2017DxOMark is in the process of testing the XZ Premium. They posted the article and then removed ... moreNo doubt some people will love "the new protocol" and change in editorial. B-)
Any one know a phone with a higher PPI pixel density than what this phone has?
When recording 4k video in this phone there's an option that says recording file type H.264 & H.265... Anyone knows what it means?
From the DxO conclusion : "Video performance is also competent, but marred by problems with loss of detail and mediocre stabilization". Ouch, that must cut the fans rather deep. Let's not forget, the DxO score means EVERYTHING (tongue in cheek) and they are pros that know what they are doing.
Anonymous, 21 Sep 2017DxOMark is in the process of testing the XZ Premium. They posted the article and then removed ... moreI know what are you thinking more megapixel doesn't mean better photos and I know that is a gimmick made popular by some brands to sell their own handset and it's not true as far as I know picture quality depends on many factors like aperture,megapixel ,size of pixel ,processing algorithm ,sharpening algorithm and one of the least known and most important loss of conversion rate so by just saying that Sony is not better you've proven nothing I know that 23 megapixel camera of x performance can beat any 2016 including s7 and g5 in normal light I got all of them for some time so you know
DxOMark is in the process of testing the XZ Premium. They posted the article and then removed it for some reason. Currently some remnants of the posted article remain on their website. Who knows, maybe they going to cook the numbers (paid), because, errr, it only scored 83 points.
Sony XZ PREMIUM have similar speakers quality and volume like Sony XA1 Ultra?
Anonymous, 20 Sep 2017Either the lowlight photography mediocre or not, I dont trust a personal opinion from an amate... moreYes so true, ,, especially since these Sony cell feeds are flooded with false and misleading information from competition!!!
[deleted post]Okay, i might be mistaken between the speakers of xz1 and xzp, but for the lowlight photography absolutely not, and the speakers are actually not that worse, they are pretty good.
[deleted post]Either the lowlight photography mediocre or not, I dont trust a personal opinion from an amateur. We better refer to the professional camera test side from Dxomark. The professional camera test side must give the verdict with solid example.
Anonymous, 20 Sep 2017He was only talking about the LG G6 and Sony XZ premium. Please re read posts before making wr... moreI know what he and you and me were talking about, my comments down there were actually corrections for missed calculations which is mostly based on your trends, the only thing this smartphone is missing is the compactness, with the other specifications it is some are on par and some are better than other smartphones including S8 and G6.
Anonymous, 20 Sep 2017Speakers are below average in volume and quality. You can read honest reviews here at gsmarena... moreThe honest review of this site says that the speakers of this smartphone with clear audio + activated is indeed below, but without it, it is average, but it doesn't mention that the speakers are actually front facing, and also you won't block it with your hand like the Galaxy's and other smartphones where their speakers are placed at the bottom like 2013 smartphones, again, regarding to the lowlight photography review, it says that it needs only steadiness and it dominates any other smartphone, Galaxy s8 and G6 were included in the review.
It looks like you need either to improve your attention or to restrict your participations with critical arguments because you might mislead so many people.
Find promotion, 20 Sep 2017I get my xzp for around 553 USD 22th the same month it was launched thou. my xzp now is almost... moreWhat is site name, that price is ridiculous at launch costed 800 and now will pay little less in nearby shop. Also can't be 550 there's shipping and tax fees. Amazon says both cost 200 and phone 600 so more than buying it from near phone shop.