[deleted post]LG's fail attempt at a flagship lol look at how low that dirt phone cost now. Nothing drops faster than Korean junk
In my country XZ1 is available for $680 whereas the XZ premium got a price slash and now it's for $601.
Anonymous, 25 Sep 2017This is officially the worst phone of 2017. Even my 1.5 year old S7 beats it.And that "officially" belongs to dream world or real world buddy? it is time to wake up :D
AnonD-633729, 25 Sep 2017Who cares? More ppi doesn't mean a better screen. In fact, it put more load on gpu and battery... moreI'm just curious to see if there really IS a phone with a higher PPI pixel density.
ph0en1x, 24 Sep 2017Convince me to buy this phone.Sure.
Did XZ Premium just won in this speed test??!
i..O.U.F.A, 22 Sep 2017Any one know a phone with a higher PPI pixel density than what this phone has?Who cares? More ppi doesn't mean a better screen. In fact, it put more load on gpu and battery with no added benefits.
Anonymous, 24 Sep 2017both of them are same dude. the same bad camera. better choose other flagshipAnd poor screen and ugly design.
Anonymous, 25 Sep 2017This is officially the worst phone of 2017. Even my 1.5 year old S7 beats it.I used it personally and my father had the s7 there is no way that the s7 beat it. I don't know about others flagship out there but I know about s7 and really it will be a joke to say s7 beat the xzp.
AnonD-94604, 24 Sep 2017This phone scores 83 in dxo. Convincing enough??Even the X performance scored 88, this is too low for a flagship.
Best camera tested when released and 4k cell, thus stiLL a beaSt of flagship! Hahaha
This is officially the worst phone of 2017. Even my 1.5 year old S7 beats it.
ph0en1x, 24 Sep 2017Convince me to buy this phone.This phone scores 83 in dxo. Convincing enough??
Anonymous, 24 Sep 2017And you wont see the originals here on gsma either...because most screens dont support DCI-P3 ... moreWell, as long as you said I just have to wait for arenas review to conclude my ignorance and incompetence...
Youre a "nice" fella...
You seem innerved by the fact this standard isnt supported by mobile browsers...
As stated, P3 is just another HDR format, available on mobile since Note7, more than a year ago.
Still not supported by browsers...
Furthermore, raw format is available since long ago. Dxo never offered raw format convesions in their prior reviews, cause it needed conversion to jpeg. Just like P3 does. Get it?
How can we know P3 format images are even anyhow better if they are indeed processed before viewable?
Just as Raw formats would definitely look bad if looked by these dxo protocols.
But/And I aint even talking about difference in standards, but review protocols using unsupported mobile standards...
Anonymous, 24 Sep 2017both of them are same dude. the same bad camera. better choose other flagshipChrome and black colors are same?? If the sony Xperia xz premium has bad camera, then good smartphone camera is definitely extinct and there is nothing beyond, i am actually started to be concerned about you.
Tann Hauser, 24 Sep 2017You like morning patronising I see... You do realise tho, their web site is readable only by ... moreAnd you wont see the originals here on gsma either...because most screens dont support DCI-P3 yet. You do know that right? I hope you do. You seem to battle with the idea of future color space adoption. Take it slow, you'll understand it all eventually....
Anonymous, 24 Sep 2017Chrome or black?both of them are same dude. the same bad camera. better choose other flagship