Super amoled will always wins all phones. Any brands of phones that has superamoled will stands out get it sony!
I jealous or you jealous I let you decide. http://www.xperiablog.net/2013/01/16/xperia-z-most-talked-about-product-of-ces/ This is the link. You know who is jealous why Sony is behind your "jealous" I agree that both brand have pro and cons. but you both seem like Samsung nothing bad, is just the perfect device in the world. Reply me pls? Play around yourself.
Anonymous, 17 Jan 2013sony xperia Z is newer than the note 2, and it still doesnt smash the note 2 u do realise that... moreI completely agree with you man, the Galaxy S4 will blow away the competition.
The Galaxy S3 has some great unique features, which the Xperia Z lacks. :P
All looks great, except for the TFT LCD screen.
It would've been the "beast" we all have been expecting if it would've had a super amoled plus screen which have better colours, sharper image and less battery drain.
I like the looks and all the rest of specs.Doesn't have cheap plastic like the S3.A pitty they didn't line up with the super amoled screen though.
Still, oppo finder 5 sounds more appealing to me than Xperia Z.Way cheaper and except the lack of card slot and LTE support, it has everything I ever wanted.Including a super amoled plus screen, better battery and wireless charging.Hope they'll release it in Europe soon enough, else Xperia Z or S 4 in march/may.
FunnyGuy, 17 Jan 2013I dont get this..
- Water proof up to 1 meter and 30 minutes
It means the device can be dipped into water for a depth of 1m top, further immersion is not advisable as the water pressure increases, it will cause leakage at the flaps
and you should NOT dip your phone into the water for more than 30minutes.
Sony does come late on their OS, which annoys me at times, also they're not so updated in new features, not to mention some bugs that appear in their system which may cause frustration.
But still, to me, all those flaws, including their bad after sales service (here in my country, that is, hope Sony guys are reading this), is worth their quality.
Some of my siblings are using Samsung, and even with their better features, they still look uglier. Samsung have design problems that's everyone knows, hence their war with Apple regarding designs.
For some, features may rules, but for me, Sony smartphones with their beautiful designs, good enough features for my daily use and their quality is what I want.
I mean, hell, I still have a SE P1 which still work perfectly since I bought it by '06, something I cannot say for Samsung n HTC that I also bought (Samsung broke after a year n 6 months for HTC)
Anonymous, 17 Jan 2013What samsung has is Galaxy pocket+, no S4, wake up. When S4 comes out, Xperia team is ready wi... moresony xperia Z is newer than the note 2, and it still doesnt smash the note 2 u do realise that? Xperia Z is better than SG3 but not in terms of features, and now imagine S4... if S2 and S3 blew away the competition in those times, why wouldnt the S4 do the same?
AnonD-98439, 17 Jan 2013to watch movies and games and so i don't have to go on my computer again.You can have 10movies(2hours average each) on 3 gig. You ran out of movies to download before you consume 20gig. Not unless you put any of movie you see.
[deleted post]What samsung has is Galaxy pocket+, no S4, wake up. When S4 comes out, Xperia team is ready with the new spandragon and smash the Hyped exymos5. Anyway plastic is as always ugly.