Bezeless is the worst idea i've ever seen in the smartphones, it's so expensive to repair when the screen broke up
King, 08 Sep 201756 % hits ? why pepole so excited about this crap !Clicked just to see the specs, laughs some time and close... That's all.
These ViVO people are fooling their customers. The processor used is SD 450 and they say the front cam is 24MP. But the official SnapDragon website says the SD 450 processor can support only upto 21MP single camera. Below is the spec from Snapdragon''s official website.
Up to 13 MP dual camera
Up to 21 MP single camera
Image Sensor Processor
2x Image Sensor Processor (ISP)
Real time Bokeh during camera preview
Qualcomm® Clear SightÂ™ camera features
LMAO at some people comparing this design to S8. Some even saying better. S8 at a different dimension baby.
AnonD-645398, 08 Sep 2017Samsung selling much better J7 Pro at 21k..
But salesmen forcing costomers to buy oppo &... moreSituation is almost like in Indonesia, many shops in several malls will suggest users to buy Oppo or Vivo. I think those were their marketing.
I was Vivo V5 users. For processor wasn't good but OK for daily use,it was long time for charging time.
I also doesn't want to buy this Vivo 7+.
They will giving V7 pro with soc SD630 and FHD+ on next few months.Then will costing u guy RM1,899 RM2,099.
Vivo r u serious!! This is tooo expensive for the price!! 720p screen in 2017! really man? 720 p on a bigger 6 inch !??? I can't even imagine ....r Snapdragon 435 is really low end ..it lags really bad .... gaming is a nightmare with this Snapdragon 435 ...its a bad device .... ! really bad ...maybe the worst possible for the price ..... 720p on 6 inch *~* i am still wondering ! why ?!
@kki, 08 Sep 2017vivo brand give better quality product, in this price segment
featu... moreWhy should I invest 22k only 720p ........ Rethink vivo
.0r only 24 mp camera...Shit
Only for camera means phone is dead investment. More over why these Chinese companies concentrate on secondary camera not on primary and low quality display very bad
6 inch display and 720p ..pathetic for 22000INR
Only USP is SELFIE in every oppo / vivo phones.
I was used vivo mobile..phone quality is very good,bettery is very poor..prise is very much den other company..my suggestion xiomee, moto, Nokia is also good company for law cost more features..vivo v7 plus have No full Hd display..Snapdragon 450 Is not good, coz 625 already give moto and mi company for 16k......22 k is very much prise..i think 15k is enough for dis model..
I thought the pricing of some recently released phones were very unreasonable but this Vivo V7+ takes the cake. It makes the LG Q6 seem like a great bargain (that phone's not a good deal either). Vivo, Oppo, and even Meizu have been charging so much for what little their phones offer. If you really want to waste this much cash on a mobile phone, why not just go with a premium brand that gives much better software support?
Vivo brand need to focus on Hi Fi function.But oppo brand need to focus on camera function.
After reading full specifications, the rate of vivo 7+ should be around INR ₹10,000/-
King, 08 Sep 201756 % hits ? why pepole so excited about this crap !U r right bro
VIVO can fool offline or local, physical shop customers. But not online shoppers. We are not fools to invest 22k for outdated chipset, low-level configuration and LOWEST PPI. All should know that camera quality doesn't depend on mega pixel. It depends on the sensor. Even in 8 MP, photos will come brilliantly if sensor is good, 24 mega pixel camera may get bad images if image capture sensor is bad. Beware! VIVO is trying to make money of nothing.