Johny25, 23 May 2016Great value for money, I was using the VF Smart Prime 6 device before and I'm really happy wit... morethis smart prime 7 is a downgrade from prime 6.
for exmaple CPU is more slower then last year model
Great value for money, I was using the VF Smart Prime 6 device before and I'm really happy with my new VF Smart Prime 7.
Lol Vodafone isn't able to build good looking smartphones with good value. They should rather invest their money into 5G and the web of kabeldeutschland
SOC and Video Res specs are incorrect. It actually uses the 1.3Ghz SD212 (identical to the SD210 but 200mhz faster). Video recording is limited to 720p, not 1080p as the SD212 can not handle higher than 720p.
You would pretty silly to upgrade your prime 6 for this. Comedians.....
Yep, Vodafone have made a mistake.
The obvious downgrade in chipset (SD410 down to SD210) is the biggest hit but they have also made it bigger but kept the screen the same. So it's now slower and less ergonomical. But it's ok because they've given us, wait for it...40mah of extra battery!
I don't think that's an argument it can win.
'Yes, we have given you a slower chipset, so much so that anything above Temple Run 2 will lag, but we've given you more battery. Unfortunately due to the outdated technology of the A7 cores there's no real efficiency bonuses so the 40mah extra will - perhaps - add another 5 minutes. On standby.'
I do hope they get it right and upgrade the Ultra. I liked that phone and got very close to buying one.
What an opportunity to improve on the 6, but Vodafone are giving us a lesser chip? Vodafone, tell us this is a mistake and they come with the Ultra's MSM8939. Or at least the 410 same as the 6. Not less???!!!
Lmfao , the smart prime 6 had a sd 410 while this has 210 , is this a joke ?