YU Yureka Plus - user opinions and reviews

• Tanmoy
• U@H
• 21 Jul 2015

How is the camera quality?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• rKv
• 21 Jul 2015

Ravi, 21 Jul 2015the specification should have been like this 3GB DDR3 Ram, Octa-core 2.3 GHz Cortex-A53, Prima... moreno other brands offer such features like 2 gb RAM 13MPCamera and etc at such price and you want 20 mp camera and 3 GB RAM

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• satya
• KAx
• 21 Jul 2015

PBN, 20 Jul 2015It is 4G+3G.thank you

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ameet
• 7wD
• 21 Jul 2015

Subhash, 21 Jul 2015do i go for this phone?without any hasitation

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Subhash
• vG9
• 21 Jul 2015

do i go for this phone?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ameet
• 7tA
• 21 Jul 2015

Much better than lenovo k3 note

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ameet
• 7tA
• 21 Jul 2015

[deleted post]didn't you saw the price

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-419483
• f}y
• 21 Jul 2015

All is well, 21 Jul 2015Yureka has one of the best SAR Value in the planet,which is too good for use(0.27 watts on hea... moreFrom which source did you get this information

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-410826
• Hkt
• 21 Jul 2015

AnonD-419191, 21 Jul 2015is it better than samsung newly launched galaxy j7 pls tell guys?bro go for J7 its a gr8 device against yureka plus ;)

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-419191
• uv1
• 21 Jul 2015

is it better than samsung newly launched galaxy j7 pls tell guys?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ziya
• ij2
• 21 Jul 2015

Its the old wine in new bottle :-D

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• SNN
• uv}
• 21 Jul 2015

When you add more features and keep the battery at 2500, its really not going to help any user. Beware of battery as I myself is not preferring any phone below 3000 mah. Certainly not gonna help the heavy users.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Ravi
• u1E
• 21 Jul 2015

the specification should have been like this 3GB DDR3 Ram, Octa-core 2.3 GHz Cortex-A53, Primary camera - 20MP, secondary camera -8MP, Battery- 3000mAh
this would have impressed people but unfortunately Yureka Plus is a disappointment.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• All is well
• t1$
• 21 Jul 2015

Yureka has one of the best SAR Value in the planet,which is too good for use(0.27 watts on head),which is far better than chinese phones like lenovo k3 note which has a SAR value of 1.59 watts(one of the worst for health).please give credit to micromax and yu for their health conscious gadjets.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• james
• U{k
• 21 Jul 2015

im was a big fan of YU and there is no improvement in battery life very very disappointment

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-417872
• U@9
• 20 Jul 2015

Micromax is really not doing well from last year...And the phones they r delivering of lowest quality....

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• sree
• rAQ
• 20 Jul 2015

Full HD on 5.5 inch with same 2500mah battery...? its definitely going to drain faster!!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Xman
• 2Zd
• 20 Jul 2015

only improvemnt in display, why can't improve battery capacity and memory slot capacity etc.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-27053
• tUs
• 20 Jul 2015

Are they mad .. the battery back up of yureka was very poor .. and now they release a full hd device with the same battery capacity ..I call this foolish .. where as the competitor lenovo k3 claims it provides 750hrs of standby and 36hrs of talk time .. YUREKA PLUS = MINUS

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• daemon
• PAX
• 20 Jul 2015

yu micromax watever .. fullhd display with snapdragon 615 and just 2500mah battery life... i was waiting for new yu phone n when it came, no improvment. dissapointment

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report