Price of the device is a bit on the higher side. Rear camera is protruding too much and looks ugly too. 3000mAh battery is not enough for a device with QHD display & 4gigs ram. Placing speaker on the rear is a bad idea. All other features are good.
Souvik +918334044719, 17 Dec 2015All features are good but the price when overlooked as Micromax and Indian brand together seem... moreAnd what about the chipset? It's the latest one than lenovo vibe p1. Actually there is comparison between lenovo vibe p1 and yutopia spec wise atleast.
AnonD-463750, 17 Dec 2015Compare to iPhone, 16GB onboard, 2GB RAM, DUAL CORE Proscessor!!! FOR INR 85K! What about this? Don't camp are with iPhone.... paper description doesn't tell all about mobile .... use it then compare... at last 4 GB ram is useless without that well performance!!!!
Souvik +918334044719, 17 Dec 2015All features are good but the price when overlooked as Micromax and Indian brand together seem... moreYou are right bro!.
pkanning on 21st dec. Lenovo vibe p1 is best in budget.
All features are good but the price when overlooked as Micromax and Indian brand together seems too high as it comes around Rs. 30,000. But these same features can be found in Lenovo Vibe P1 other than the camera and RAM. All the basic and attracting features are already in Lenovo Vibe P1 with an affordable price of Rs 15,999.
So my next phone would be Lenovo Vibe P1.
But then what difference between oneplus 2 and yu.Yu other smartphone is cheaper than all brands with high end spec.Yutopia price will may be drop in future.
AnonD-206412, 17 Dec 2015too much hype these days. . . and 810 in the end. . .32gb onboard storage for a phone priced 25k ???Compare to iPhone, 16GB onboard, 2GB RAM, DUAL CORE Proscessor!!! FOR INR 85K! What about this?
AnonD-395111, 17 Dec 2015USB Type C missing, otherwise everything is OK.USB-C is very irritating, can't use for normal computer to phone, only charging. You need to buy a new laptop (latest) to get full use of USB-C. And USB-C is not already available completely in India, so better if it has no USB-C
AnonD-470806, 17 Dec 2015I would say oneplus one is better as almost same specs but better quality, still cannot judge ... moreBullShit better quality, MADE IN CHINA! So no quality. And it doesn't have quick charge, as many Sensors, Cyanogen which makes this better
[deleted post]Haaa!! Can you tell me practical uses of NFC? Only easy file transfer, better use Bluetooth for larger range or use ShareIt for free high speed and high range file transfer, now NFC needs direct contact of devices, right? No better is BT or Wi-Fi. If you say instant payments, that is applicable in India in only few places, not everywhere, and this is made according to Indian needs
druidshy, 17 Dec 2015This is only the 5th mobile of YU and lot of issues in yureka and yuphoria automatic closing,a... moreDo you know, if Samsung or other brand makes it, it would cost INR 50,000 above. So price is good, and they are making this with high precision, they will obviously look out to make no faults
Everything is ok in this phone but only 2 thing dissapointed every people
1-missing physical butten at bottom
2-camera design suck..same as yuphoria yu made people to fool bec he give bad design of camera..
Samsung A8 is bettter than yutopia
Also oneplus 2
GK, 17 Dec 2015Pluses: Specifications on paper is very good 21 Cam, 4K recording, QHD Display sounds great ... moreYes all cam sucks i agree but this time front and rear cam use big pixel and sensor size so they have improment about cam i think
Good speces phone. Atleast from spec it looking better than OP2/Mi4.But lack of NFC will sure impact.it is sub USD400 phone.it has SD810.so i dont see any competition in this mid range.but no NFC,i m little disappointed with YU.
Hey frnds i just tried the compare feature in gsmarena to compare yutopia with one plue 2 and the site said - u cant compare their features the only thing u can compare is their price
Sunny, 17 Dec 2015Speakers shld be at bottom. YU has not mentioned if it was a water resistant mobile!!!! Luks... moreIf it would have been water/dust/shock resistant, it would have been clearly highlighted in it's specifications, don't you think???