5 megapixel Motorola ZN5 nears
- dmatt
- Report
- 0
The only thing I hate more than the hate comments is the poor english in which they're written. At least put effort in it people.
This phone does the trick for me, slim, for everyday use, good looks and a decent camera. We all know those are prototype shots, so please stop being crying little girls about it.
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 19:33
- PcQn
- MdN
- Report
- 0
Did you not realize those pics were taken in the evening, or maybe at night? At LOW LIGHT? No other camphone can do this. Way to go Motorola!
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 19:29
- Mtr2
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
It seems that the moto should follow the siemens track -- sell their mobile phone division before it goes into bankruptcy.
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 19:23
- qEtP
- MOBILEMAN
- Report
- 0
Please... How can post that pics??? look the pixels...!!! its so ugly... have a very bad definition...The threes, the sky with black points. I think kodak can do a better job
DESING...Nice in the front..but back??? a kodak design. Like an ugly chrome frame arround the camera and a biiiig kodad logo :o/ just like the kodak camera...even the lines.
give me a break...
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 18:49
- LEBy
- darkmarko
- Report
- 0
if they fix the camera problems and if it can realy record in RAW this will be the best cameraphone on the market!
but linux? it rocks on computers but is it good on phones?
windows sucks on both HAHAHAAAA!!!!!
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 18:35
- 0Tnj
- cmos
- Report
- 0
comparing to se??sorry at least they have put kodak cmos into it,not like srry ericsson,just put a 5.0cmos and add some programe into it then done!srry lol k85xx touch pad already out at lot of problem...pls don't compare se with NOKIA,MOTOROLA,LG,SAMSUNG, wan compare???
a THAILAND phone called i-mobile 902,this phone are a standard comparism for k850i only.
other???no,or a 3.2megapixels carzl zeiss optics can la...
a cmos wan to compare to kodak...this world people so funny i diot
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 17:08
- wc6i
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
kodak CCD sensor is 1 of the best in da world... but... look at that picture... did they need a good lens? and... izzit best in CCD sensor not mean good in CMOS seonsor?
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 16:58
- TC{F
- Rob
- Report
- 0
I'd rather have the samsung i550w,middle price phone that has everythng,or the good old n80.
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 16:58
- M@T2
- Rob
- Report
- 0
Ohh the once mighty motorola phones are evaporating.Lack of innovation,poor os,.Only build qualitys gud.
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 16:55
- M@T2
- Four Star.
- Report
- 0
Moto is really working hard. And Im sure in just next ten twenty years it will be able to make good phones. Keep doing Moto... You r making history
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 16:52
- pJb{
- Mystique Blazer
- Report
- 0
Oh from now it's Babye Moto... well Camera Quality is Poor when Compared with Sony Ericsson K850i or Compared with The King N95 8GB
and yeah it's design is also not good.. It would be much better if you go for LG Viewty it has much better camera then this and the price is Almost Same!
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 16:41
- PDTi
- Rob
- Report
- 0
I think the kodak is only a marketing gimmick.They're desperate to compete with nokia and samsungs 5 mp cam w/c i thnk already been out 10 mos. Ago...If only sony and samsung wil also releasd the phones they only releasd in japan and korea respectively,nokia and motorolas latest wil look like obsolete phones.
- Reply
- 2008-05-02 16:38
- M@T2
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.