Apple iPhone 4S review: Fast 4ward
Nokia N9 review: Once in a lifetimeNokia N76 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.8
- Features
-
7.6
- Performance
-
7.6
- Mitko
- Report
- 0
This phone look good but the battery have to be changed on the moment . I can make only 2 calls and the battery will be over .
- Reply
- 2007-01-18 14:01
- nv{s
- U
- Safi
- Report
- 0
Yeh!!!!!!!!!!!! its a very cute & Sexy fone, i love glam shell models.....
- Reply
- 2007-01-18 12:05
- PAYX
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/August2006/3412.htm
http://www.motodaily.com/2006/...rtake-nokia/
- Reply
- 2007-01-18 08:08
- PxvC
- U
- churva!
- Report
- 0
hey you are all wrong!!! this phone is really nice ok... so, goodluck! CHURVA
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 22:37
- 2Atj
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
wow that phone looks too good in black...I would definetly consider buying it
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 20:07
- SYfe
- U
- samia khan
- Report
- 0
this is kooooooooo0l
wo0w
i gonna take this anywayz
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 19:38
- PAmR
- U
- Richard Buchanan
- Report
- 0
don't just look at the specs, go out and use a RAZR maxx. word is spreading quite rapidly how awesome of a phone it is. leagues above previous motorola phones, especially the V3. i've preached about that NVIDIA goforce 4800 processor for months now and people see the fruits. no lag, improved menu structure. the nokia fanboys won't have much to complain about.
motorola will soon unveil another upgrade running linux. in the coming months they'll have slim phones like the motorola Q with HSDPA for europe that are heads above nokia's slim phones.
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 19:29
- nvGc
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Yeah the v3 suks. the original v3, not the upgraded ones. just take a look at the Motorola Razr Maxx v6's specs, and you'll see why.
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 13:28
- PxvC
- U
- blades
- Report
- 0
Ok motorola has better desing, but v3 sucks in functions and menus. It's realy bad and not user friendly. But a symbian with the size of a motorola V3 that's just perfect. Thank god nokia realized that people also like small phones.
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 11:25
- MFMJ
- U
- putra
- Report
- 0
i think it's good, has good function, and looks stylish in black. don't u all agree? it's not bad at all. and it's quite affordable u know!!?!
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 11:14
- w6Z9
- U
- Jojo
- Report
- 0
I prefer Nokia mobile since I got my first one. But only because of their fine signal reception. Not their styles or funtions. But now is really dissapointing that they have to copy other's design? Don't Nokia's designers have their own great ideas? What a Shame!!!
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 05:07
- T7fI
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
oh yeah, and if you guys want fashion as well as function,the motorola maxx has 2 strips of blue lights on each side that blinks accordingly to the ringtone's rythm whenever you recieve a message. the Motorola logo on the front lights up too.
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 04:55
- PxvC
- U
- Richard Buchanan
- Report
- 0
nokia has hit rock bottom. finally coming to realize that motorola had the superior design all these years. they force fed you nokia fanboys N-Series bricks and you proclaimed them superior. now nokia has said otherwise by ripping off the critically acclaimed, #1 selling Motorola RAZR series.
lol, you can't even open this with one hand? what good is it? the RAZR maxx has nice grooves along the sides to allow for easy one-handed operation.
nokia needs to leave design to motorola. the only time they have anything halfway decent is when it's as thick as a dictionary.
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 03:54
- nvGc
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
i reckon the razr maxx and the n76 are about the same in terms of features. the n76 has the better screen, class 32 edge and an fm radio, the razr maxx has touch sensitive keys, HSDPA, 24 MBs more internal memory and A2DP accompanying the bluetooth. But to my choice, i'd rather have the RAZR maxx. It looks better and has a very useful flash to take pictures in the night.
- Reply
- 2007-01-17 02:13
- PxvC
- U
