GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

2.1m
180k
RSS

EV

Merch

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • Deals
  • Merch
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENT
GSMArena Team, 01 September 2025

The Ultra cameraphone comparison: Oppo vs Samsung vs Xiaomi vs Vivo vs Huawei

  • Comments (239)
  • Pura 80 Ultra
  • Find X8 Ultra

5. Photos: Ultrawide to standard, low light
  1. 1. Intro, specs overview
  2. 2. Photos: Ultrawide to standard comparison (13-50mm), daylight
  3. 3. Photos: Telephoto comparison (70mm and up), daylight
  4. 4. Photos: Portraits, closeups, selfies
  5. 5. Photos: Ultrawide to standard, low light
  6. 6. Photos: Telephoto, low light
  7. 7. Video recording: Daylight
  8. 8. Video recording: Low light
  9. 9. Wrap-up
  10.  
  11. Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 5G specification
  12. Oppo Find X8 Ultra specification
  13. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra specification
  14. vivo X200 Ultra specification
  15. Xiaomi 15 Ultra specification
  16. Review comments (239)

Oppo Samsung Xiaomi vivo Huawei Android Camera comparison

Ultrawide camera comparison

Moving into some nighttime photography, it should be the vivo that rules in the ultrawide comparison. Indeed it does, capturing the cleanest, sharpest and most detailed shots out of this bunch. The others are different levels of compromise, with the Oppo deserving a mention for somehow managing better than the rest, though far from the vivo. The Xiaomi should have roughly the same hardware as the Oppo, but its photos are typically softer. The Huawei is also kind of mushy.

Then there's the Galaxy, which is probably the only remaining big name model that has vastly different processing in Photo mode and Night mode and neither is on par with the best examples in the field.

Low light, ultrawide: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (13mm) - f/2.2, ISO 1000, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (15mm) - f/2.0, ISO 3200, 1/11s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (13mm) - f/1.9, ISO 800, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: vivo X200 Ultra (14mm) - f/2.0, ISO 3022, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (14mm) - f/2.2, ISO 8000, 1/11s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, ultrawide: Huawei (13mm) • Oppo (15mm) • Samsung (13mm) • vivo (14mm) • Xiaomi (14mm)

Low light, ultrawide: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (13mm) - f/2.2, ISO 1250, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (15mm) - f/2.0, ISO 3200, 1/8s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (13mm) - f/1.9, ISO 1250, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: vivo X200 Ultra (14mm) - f/2.0, ISO 3817, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (14mm) - f/2.2, ISO 10000, 1/9s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, ultrawide: Huawei (13mm) • Oppo (15mm) • Samsung (13mm) • vivo (14mm) • Xiaomi (14mm)

Low light, ultrawide: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (13mm) - f/2.2, ISO 1250, 1/10s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (15mm) - f/2.0, ISO 4000, 1/8s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (13mm) - f/1.9, ISO 1600, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: vivo X200 Ultra (14mm) - f/2.0, ISO 4923, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, ultrawide: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (14mm) - f/2.2, ISO 8000, 1/7s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, ultrawide: Huawei (13mm) • Oppo (15mm) • Samsung (13mm) • vivo (14mm) • Xiaomi (14mm)

We'll be making an exception and we'll be including the Galaxy's Night mode results for additional comparisons. The other phones don't need that treatment because they either produce the same photos regardless of mode, or their full auto Photo mode images are good enough that they don't need the extra effort.

Low light, Night mode: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (13mm) - f/1.9, ISO 320, 1/10s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, Night mode: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (13mm) - f/1.9, ISO 500, 1/10s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, Night mode: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (13mm) - f/1.9, ISO 640, 1/10s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, Night mode: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (13mm)

Main camera comparison

Wide angle - 23-25mm

At 23-24mm the Oppo and the Xiaomi show very similar results with a small but not negligible advantage for the Find - it's that extra bit sharper and more detailed. In true Huawei tradition (the OG Night mode pioneers), the Pura 80 Ultra delivers bright exposures and plenty of saturation - it's a look. The vivo is scraping by with its ultrawide stretched to its limits - you'll be avoiding the 24mm focal length during the day and there's no reason you'd be choosing it at night either. The Samsung is again forcing you to choose between its soft and noisy default output and the smoothened out Night mode results.

Low light, wide angle: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (24mm) - f/1.6, ISO 1250, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.8, ISO 1600, 1/17s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 2000, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: vivo X200 Ultra (24mm) - f/2.0, ISO 2980, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.6, ISO 5000, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, wide angle: Huawei (24mm) • Oppo (23mm) • Samsung (23mm) • vivo (24mm) • Xiaomi (23mm)

Low light, wide angle: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (24mm) - f/1.6, ISO 250, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.8, ISO 1600, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1600, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: vivo X200 Ultra (24mm) - f/2.0, ISO 3856, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.6, ISO 5000, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, wide angle: Huawei (24mm) • Oppo (23mm) • Samsung (23mm) • vivo (24mm) • Xiaomi (23mm)

Low light, wide angle: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (24mm) - f/1.6, ISO 1250, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.8, ISO 2000, 1/13s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1600, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: vivo X200 Ultra (24mm) - f/2.0, ISO 4912, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, wide angle: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.6, ISO 8000, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, wide angle: Huawei (24mm) • Oppo (23mm) • Samsung (23mm) • vivo (24mm) • Xiaomi (23mm)

Once again, the Galaxy's images above have their respective Night mode counterparts shown below.

Low light, Night mode: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 800, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, Night mode: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1250, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, Night mode: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 2500, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, Night mode: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm)

Standard - 35mm

The vivo main camera counteroffensive comes at 35mm, where the Oppo and the Samsung just might look close to decent. Technically, you should probably examine the vivo's 35mm results against the other phones' 23-24mm shots, but by now you've likely come up with your own comparison workflow.

Either way, in the dark, even more so than during the day, it makes sense to be using your phone's cameras at the zoom levels they were designed for - experimenting to find your balance is always a good idea, of course.

Low light, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (36mm) - f/1.6, ISO 1250, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.8, ISO 1600, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 800, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1368, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.6, ISO 4000, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, standard: Huawei (36mm) • Oppo (35mm) • Samsung (35mm) • vivo (35mm) • Xiaomi (35mm)

Low light, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (38mm) - f/1.6, ISO 800, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.8, ISO 1600, 1/17s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 640, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1386, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.6, ISO 5000, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, standard: Huawei (38mm) • Oppo (35mm) • Samsung (35mm) • vivo (35mm) • Xiaomi (35mm)

Low light, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (38mm) - f/1.6, ISO 1250, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.8, ISO 2000, 1/14s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1000, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1898, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.6, ISO 6400, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, standard: Huawei (38mm) • Oppo (35mm) • Samsung (35mm) • vivo (35mm) • Xiaomi (35mm)

Standard - 46-50mm

Somewhat surprisingly, it's the Xiaomi that is having the hardest time at 2x zoom at night, returning the softest images, by a rather wide margin. At the other end of the spectrum is the vivo, which is about as good as you can hope for. The others are somewhere inbetween.

Low light, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (48mm) - f/1.6, ISO 200, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (47mm) - f/1.8, ISO 3200, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (46mm) - f/1.7, ISO 640, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1506, 1/17s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.6, ISO 640, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, standard: Huawei (48mm) • Oppo (47mm) • Samsung (46mm) • vivo (50mm) • Xiaomi (50mm)

Low light, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (48mm) - f/1.6, ISO 400, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (47mm) - f/1.8, ISO 1600, 1/17s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (46mm) - f/1.7, ISO 640, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1296, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.6, ISO 5000, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, standard: Huawei (48mm) • Oppo (47mm) • Samsung (46mm) • vivo (50mm) • Xiaomi (50mm)

Low light, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (48mm) - f/1.6, ISO 400, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (47mm) - f/1.8, ISO 2000, 1/13s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (46mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1000, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.7, ISO 1708, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison Low light, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.6, ISO 6400, 1/25s - Ultra camera comparison
Low light, standard: Huawei (48mm) • Oppo (47mm) • Samsung (46mm) • vivo (50mm) • Xiaomi (50mm)

Next Page » 6. Photos: Telephoto, low light
5. Photos: Ultrawide to standard, low light
  1. 1. Intro, specs overview
  2. 2. Photos: Ultrawide to standard comparison (13-50mm), daylight
  3. 3. Photos: Telephoto comparison (70mm and up), daylight
  4. 4. Photos: Portraits, closeups, selfies
  5. 5. Photos: Ultrawide to standard, low light
  6. 6. Photos: Telephoto, low light
  7. 7. Video recording: Daylight
  8. 8. Video recording: Low light
  9. 9. Wrap-up
  10.  
  11. Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 5G specification
  12. Oppo Find X8 Ultra specification
  13. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra specification
  14. vivo X200 Ultra specification
  15. Xiaomi 15 Ultra specification
  16. Review comments (239)

Reviews The Ultra cameraphone comparisonPage 5
  • Comments (239)
  • Pura 80 Ultra
  • Find X8 Ultra

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • Nothing
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • Ulefone
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • RugOne
  • Umidigi
  • Fairphone
  • Oscal
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • Asus
  • Tecno
  • Doogee
  • Blackview
  • Cubot
  • Oukitel
  • Itel
  • TCL

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENT

Popular reviews

Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max review
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max review
Apple iPhone 18 Pro review
Apple iPhone 18 Pro review
Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra review
Galaxy Tab S12 Ultra review
ADVERTISEMENT

ELECTRIC VEHICLES

XPeng sends Mona L05 to customers abroad ahead of Chinese launch XPeng sends Mona L05 to customers abroad ahead of Chinese launch Audi announces major restructuring of China operations with brand split2026 BMW i5 xDrive40 real life range test with 19-inch wheels and summer tires
ADVERTISEMENT
Ads by Playwire

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS Youtube Instagram TikTok Facebook Twitter

© 2000-2026 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use