i think it's because Sony Ericsson had already the right to license UIQ. and motorola uses UIQ so they decided to sell it only at vodafone.
I has "Motorola V600" and already 5 times drop to down to the rock; battery cover open, battery come out. That's happend many times but nothing broken. Don't be lie.
Wow I didnt realize there were so many die-hard moto fans out there.
Thing is, after I've owned a Moto, it makes me wonder how people can think Moto makes good phones after you've used it.
Theyre pretty and all, but the UI, ease-of-use and quality seems to lag a little behind other brands.
But this is my opinion after using the v600 (the speaker stopped working after a while so I had to sell it; same thing happened to my friend's v300).
Motorola might be a very creative company but they should work on the quality of their phones.
Just an opinion, no hard feelings.
If this wasn't a Motorola and had better specs I would buy it in a heartbeat.
If you want see the result of "Music handsets comparison – which one to choose?"
- Motorola ROKR E2
- Nokia 3250
- Samsung X700
- Siemens S75
- Sony Ericsson W800i
- Sony Ericsson W810i (almost the same as Sony Ericsson W300i)
- Sony Ericsson W900i
Just read this link => http://www.mobile-review.com/review/music-phones-en.shtml
Every mobile phone has category. Which one music phone, which one camera phone, etc.
motorola are trying to improve the inside of the phones not the outside that is why they release the same handset cover time and time
to richard buchanan,
and also, this one is UIQ 3.1 powered. so it has very good UI and looks like P990 without touchscreen. but how about the non-os phones of moto? if you try comparing the SE's latest JP-7 enabled K800 to Razr V6 which is better? i know you know what UI will be better. but don't mean V6's UI graphics isn't good and is better compared to S40 and S60 too. but the great UI feeling of SE really counts for sure.
to PDLx(no name)
it's because UIQ is built with so many kernels supporting every possible features that can't be seen at s60. but if nokia will make S90 and S80 back then. UIQ will have a serious fight with those.
to richard buchanan,
the SE's 3 UIQ phones plays VGA videos in 30 fps also. but if it could have touchscreen for handwriting recognition it'll be better i think. remember that this is a new UIQ phone. and SE just plans to launch 2 UIQ phones this Q1 with the new UIQ 3.1 too. the older UIQ 3.0 phones were already in a year since introduced and remember SE has just aquired UIQ technologies. so expect SE to do better along with the other UIQ phones.
but anyhow. if moto and SE will help each other for the new platform then UIQ will make very good steps towards success IMHO.
the nokia n95/e90 have HSPDA and Wifi 54mpbs. so where is the innovation?
moto have 3G,& also can havwe 10Mbps but & only
can used with wlan which is not mention hehe;)
If i compare between "Nokia 9500", "Nokia 9300" and "Motorola Z8"; i prefer "Motorola Z8". Nokia never never learn from their "Nokia Communicators" problem. From "Nokia 9110", "Nokia 9210", "Nokia 9300", "Nokia 9300i", and "Nokia 9500" always same problem; hang problem. I think that's same problem will happen with "Nokia E90". Is that's good performance?
this is a multi-purpose phone
kudos to motorolla for the innovations.
If you want compare. I can compare too, i prefer to buy "Motorola Q" than "Nokia E61" and "Sony Ericsson M600", "Nokia E61" expensive and doesn't has camera / video camera. "Sony Ericsson M600" doesn't has camera / video camera and un-comfortable "Qwerty Keyboard". With the same price between "Nokia E61", "Sony Ericsson M600" amd "Motorola Q"; i better choose "Motorola Q" because much much good performance.
Come on Nokia. Come on Sony Ericsson. "High End" or "Middle End" Mobile doesn't has camera / video camera? Don't just copy cat Motorola Concepts.
the phone certainly looks good, and it has a lot of good stuff in it, but they didnt do much to make this phone any better than the other motorolas. its still a looks like a great phone though
I get the point, Im agree too Mr.Duck, these are not only phones any more ...
Im sorry, it was only my opinion cause for a big price I will only expect for some real improvement and not just a phone, if I will only buy a phone I will buy a C115 and belive me thats a good one! with nice signial and very heavy duty case.But for a big price yes, I want it all, if Im wrong sorry, but its my opinion actualy I have a V6maxx and it really disapoint me a lot cause for the same price I could buy an N80 or K800 or something like that, with many more performances than Moto can gives to me. Remember Its only My opinion I dont wanna troubles but I think that everybody can expres whst they want. And For me Motorola its a gret "Phone Industry" but serious now, we are no longer speaking of only phones. we are talking about of products with many benefits and large so much advances in entertainments as in functions, so my point is that for a big price I will expect rally big stuff.
thankz for reading my opinion, being or not in agreement with me. I expect that you will understand my point of view
Come on "Nokia Fan's". Today Nokia closed 2 Nokia factory in Finlandia. If you said Nokia is great, why Nokia must closed 2 Nokia factory.
Too many Nokia Symbian Mobile always has same problem, unsolved problem. All Nokia Communicator (Nokia 9110 until Nokia 9500) always same problem, always hang.
Before "Motorola Z3", i can said the camera results is not really good but after i use "Motorola Z3" i can said the camera results is great.
Too many silly / stupid people here to give silly / stupid comments.
Nokia always copy cat from Motorola. Nokia copy cat concept from Motorola: Concept Motorola Upgrade firmware online, Concept Motorola Razr, Concept Motorola swivel phone, Concept Motorola dual hinge (can open horizontal and vertical), Concept Motorola sleamless phone, Concept Motorola slim phone, too many Motorola Concept.
If Nokia great, why Nokia always copy cat concept from Motorola? Because Motorola is great.