GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

2.1m
180k
RSS

EV

Merch

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • Deals
  • Merch
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENT

Samsung Galaxy A56 vs. Samsung Galaxy A55

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (52)

Ro 17 April 2025

Samsung Android Versus Featured

Samsung's most sought-after midranger, the Samsung Galaxy A56 is here, and many of you are left wondering how much better it is compared to its predecessor, the Samsung Galaxy A55. After all, Samsung's extended software support makes older models a sensible solution for many. Although if you are reading this from the US, you don't have that much of a choice except getting the Galaxy A56 as the A55 was never available across the pond.

The difference in MSRP between the two is about €100, but in reality, third-party stores have already slashed the A56 price premium in the EU to just about €20-30.

In the UK, the A56 is only available in a 256GB tier, while the A55 is only available as a 128GB model. What's more, Samsung seemingly has much better control over the A56 retail pricing there so the current price difference between the old and the new model is a whopping £140. Neither model is available in US.

So with pricing varying that wildly, it's only natural to wonder whether the newer device is worth the premium or not. Now let's dive deeper beyond just the specs sheets.

Table of Contents:

  • Design
  • Display
  • Battery Life
  • Charging
  • Speaker Test
  • Performance
  • Cameras
  • Verdict

For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor's assessment in the following video or in the text below.

Size comparison

Samsung Galaxy A56 Samsung
Galaxy A56
198 g
162.2 x 77.5 x 7.4 mm
(6.39 x 3.05 x 0.29 in)
Samsung Galaxy A55 Samsung
Galaxy A55
213 g
161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm
(6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in)

There are no major design changes, but one could argue the Galaxy A56 is more refined. For instance, the device has a slightly bigger 6.7-inch display, compared to the 6.6-inch panel on the A55, but comes in roughly the same dimensions. It's just a millimeter taller, but considerably lighter.

Samsung Galaxy A56 vs. Samsung Galaxy A55

Additionally, the A56 gets an upgraded Gorilla Glass Victus+ back glass, unlike the standard glass on the A55. Aside from that, you won't feel much of a difference between the A56 and A55.

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A56 Samsung
Galaxy A56
6.7"
AMOLED
120Hz
1080x2340
pixels
385
ppi
1213
nits
Samsung Galaxy A55 Samsung
Galaxy A55
6.6"
AMOLED
120Hz
1080x2340
pixels
390
ppi
1010
nits

Besides the obvious size difference, the newer Galaxy A56 has a slightly brighter display. The A56 peaked above 1,200 nits in our tests, while the A55 barely got over 1,000 nits.

To be frank, this isn't a big difference, as both phones should provide good sunlight legibility even on bright sunny days.

The two displays have no feature differences as they both support HDR10+ and 120Hz refresh rate.

Battery life

Surprisingly, the Galaxy A55 offers longer battery life overall, even though the Galaxy A56 boasts a more energy-efficient chipset. The Galaxy A55 got a higher 13:27h Active Use Score in our proprietary tests with considerably longer call, video playback and gaming runtimes than the new A56.

Conversely, the Galaxy A56 edged out the A55 in the web browsing test by a small margin. All in all, the A55 seems to have the better battery life of the two.

Charging speed

Samsung Galaxy A56 Samsung
Galaxy A56
5000 mAh
45W
15min
38%
30min
65%
Full
73min
Samsung Galaxy A55 Samsung
Galaxy A55
5000 mAh
25W
15min
29%
30min
55%
Full
63min

Neither of the two is particularly fast when it comes to charging, but the Galaxy A56 now supports 45W fast charging, while the A55 is capped at 25W. Neither phone comes with a charger, but for the A56, you'd also have to get a 5 Amp cable too if you want the fastest charging possible, as the one in the box is rated at 3 Amp only.

The difference in charging speed is marginal. According to our tests, the A56 charges faster at the beginning of the charging cycle, reaching a higher percentage at the 15 and 30-minute marks, but it takes 10 minutes longer than the A55 to reach 100%.

Arguably, the A56's charging curve is more practical because you likely won't have to charge the phone to 100% when you are in a hurry.

Speaker test

When it comes to loudness, the Galaxy A55's speakers are marginally louder, even though it earns a "Very Good" score as opposed to the A56's "Good" score.

However, the tuning is different. The Galaxy A56 produces warmer, deeper sound with more prominent bass and potentially less distortion at higher volume, while the A55 offers cleaner vocals but flatter sound.

Performance

The newer Galaxy A56 runs on a more recent Exynos 1580 chipset, which is more powerful than the Exynos 1480 running inside the A55.

Samsung Galaxy A56 Samsung
Galaxy A56
Exynos 1580
4 nm
128GB 6GB RAM
base config
Samsung Galaxy A55 Samsung
Galaxy A55
Exynos 1480
4nm
128GB 6GB RAM
base config

The two handsets offer identical memory configurations, but the A56 upgrades the storage from UFS 2.1 to UFS 3.1. So you will get slightly faster storage if you go for the A56.

Benchmark performance

Samsung Galaxy A56 Samsung
Galaxy A56
AnTuTu 10
908,689
Geekbench 6
3,899
3D Mark Wild Life
1,332
Samsung Galaxy A55 Samsung
Galaxy A55
AnTuTu 10
726,158
Geekbench 6
3,350
3D Mark Wild Life
1,024

The raw benchmark results show a significant performance gain with the Galaxy A56 this year. The Exynos 1580 outperforms the Exynos 1480 by around 16% in the pure CPU scenario and more than 30% in the GPU-intensive 3DMark benchmark. The combined test shows a 25% performance increase.

It's quite obvious that if you are in for the performance, without a doubt, the A56 should be your first choice.

Camera comparison

The Galaxy A56 and A55 rely on the same camera hardware on the back. They have a 50MP main shooter joined by a 12MP ultrawide camera and a dedicated 5MP macro snapper.

As for the selfies, the A56 gets a newer, better 12MP sensor, albeit with a lower resolution compared to the A55's 32MP sensor.

Below we have a few samples taken by the two phones at the same locations but at different times.

Image quality

Looking at the stills from the primary camera, it's safe to say that there's virtually no difference in overall quality. Rendition is very similar as well and we couldn't find meaningful difference in daylight and nighttime scenarios.

Main camera: Galaxy A56 (f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/2703s) Main camera: Galaxy A55 (f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/3135s) Main camera: Galaxy A56 (f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/2392s) Main camera: Galaxy A55 (f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/2551s)
Main camera: Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55 • Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55

Main camera: Galaxy A56 (f/1.8, ISO 640, 1/25s) Main camera: Galaxy A55 (f/1.8, ISO 500, 1/25s) Main camera: Galaxy A56 (f/1.8, ISO 800, 1/20s) Main camera: Galaxy A55 (f/1.8, ISO 800, 1/20s)
Main camera: Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55 • Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55

The only difference we were able to spot is in the exposure. The A55 tends to have more balanced exposure with more natural-looking shadows at night, while the A56's highlights are a bit too bright during the day as well as the shadows in the nighttime pictures.

The 2x zoom photos are very similar again, but the A56 pulls ahead with cleaner and sharper-looking stills during the day. Quality is pretty much identical at night, though.

2x crop zoom: Galaxy A56 (f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/2062s) 2x crop zoom: Galaxy A55 (f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/3546s) 2x crop zoom: Galaxy A56 (f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/1773s) 2x crop zoom: Galaxy A55 (f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/2786s)
Main camera: Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55 • Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55

2x crop zoom: Galaxy A56 (f/1.8, ISO 500, 1/25s) 2x crop zoom: Galaxy A55 (f/1.8, ISO 400, 1/25s) 2x crop zoom: Galaxy A56 (f/1.8, ISO 1000, 1/20s) 2x crop zoom: Galaxy A55 (f/1.8, ISO 1000, 1/20s)
2x crop zoom: Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55 • Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55

And as for the ultrawide, we couldn't spot any difference, regardless of the lighting conditions.

Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A56 (f/2.2, ISO 40, 1/1086s) Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A55 (f/2.2, ISO 40, 1/1203s) Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A56 (f/2.2, ISO 40, 1/1244s) Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A55 (f/2.2, ISO 40, 1/1319s)
Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55 • Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55

Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A56 (f/2.2, ISO 800, 1/20s) Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A55 (f/2.2, ISO 800, 1/20s) Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A56 (f/2.2, ISO 800, 1/14s) Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A55 (f/2.2, ISO 800, 1/14s)
Ultrawide camera: Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55 • Galaxy A56 • Galaxy A55

Video quality

Below we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at different times and locations.

Video recording quality is about identical. The nighttime video, on the other hand, looks generally better on the A56. It's sharper, more detailed, but with a bit more pale colors compared to the A55.

4K video screengrabs: Galaxy A56 0.6x 4K video screengrabs: Galaxy A55 0.6x
4K video screengrabs: Galaxy A56 1x 4K video screengrabs: Galaxy A55 1x
4K video screengrabs: Galaxy A56 1x low-light 4K video screengrabs: Galaxy A55 1x low-light
4K video screengrabs: A56 0.6x • A55 0.6x • A56 1x • A55 1x • A56 1x low-light • A55 1x low-light

Verdict

As you can see, the Galaxy A56's upgrade over A55 is modest, to say the least. So, no wonder people find it hard to decide between saving a few bucks and getting the older A55 instead, or just going for the latest and greatest.

For the Galaxy A56's price premium, you will get a slightly more refined design, a better chipset, marginally faster charging, speakers with better tuning, better selfies, low-light video, and two extra years of software support (6 vs. 4 major OS updates).

Last year's Galaxy A55, on the other hand, offers roughly the same camera experience, longer battery life, and has a microSD card slot.

So if you reside in a market where the difference between the two is small (like the EU), it makes all the sense to go for the newer model. However, if you already own a Galaxy A55 or your market has a large gap in the pricing between the two models, we suggest you stick with A55 or wait a bit more until the A56 pricing inevitably goes down.




    Samsung Galaxy A56

    Get the Samsung Galaxy A56 for:

  • The slightly thinner and more refined design.
  • The better speakers.
  • The more powerful chipset.
  • The marginally faster charging.
  • The two extra years of software support.

These are the best offers from our affiliate partners. We may get a commission from qualifying sales.

128GB 8GB RAM$ 299.00Deal£ 245.52Deal
256GB 8GB RAM$ 345.00Deal£ 349.99Deal
Show all prices
    Samsung Galaxy A55

    Get the Samsung Galaxy A55 for:

  • The considerably lower price tag (in some markets).
  • The longer battery life.
  • The roughly the same user experience, including camera performance.
  • The microSD card slot.

These are the best offers from our affiliate partners. We may get a commission from qualifying sales.

128GB 8GB RAM£ 334.18Deal€ 229.06Deal
256GB 8GB RAM£ 349.00Deal€ 283.99Deal
Show all prices
Related articles
  • Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Google Pixel 9 Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Google Pixel 9
  • Samsung Galaxy A36 vs. Samsung Galaxy A56 Samsung Galaxy A36 vs. Samsung Galaxy A56
  • Our Nothing Phone (3a) vs. Phone (3a) Pro video is now out: which one to get? Our Nothing Phone (3a) vs. Phone (3a) Pro video is now out: which one to get?
  • Nothing Phone (3a) vs. (3a) Pro Nothing Phone (3a) vs. (3a) Pro

Reader comments

S
  • Solo
  • m5c
  • 04 Oct 2025

No SD means a55 costs more vs the newer a56 lol. Amazon price shows it clearly.

  • Reply
H
  • Happycat
  • t75
  • 01 Sep 2025

A56 is 👎 because it has no sd card slot will stick with my A55

  • Reply
  • Claymon
  • Gva
  • 08 Jun 2025

I have a16 as a secondary phone along with realme 9i, both have the same battery capacity 5000 mAh and 9i is older (9i announced january 2022 while a16 october 2024) and both have similar battery life with a slight advantage for a16 but 9i is faster ...

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 52

Recommended
  • Apple reportedly lowered its iPhone Duo QA standards to get more units out in time Apple reportedly lowered its iPhone Duo QA standards to get more units out in time
  • Chargers explained - how to pick up the right phone charger Chargers explained - how to pick up the right phone charger
  • Motorola Signature 27 flexes muscle on Geekbench ahead of November 5 launch Motorola Signature 27 flexes muscle on Geekbench ahead of November 5 launch
  • Ultrahuman Air is a smart ring that monitors sleep, recovery and more Ultrahuman Air is a smart ring that monitors sleep, recovery and more
ADVERTISEMENT

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • Nothing
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • Ulefone
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • RugOne
  • Umidigi
  • Fairphone
  • Oscal
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • Asus
  • Tecno
  • Doogee
  • Blackview
  • Cubot
  • Oukitel
  • Itel
  • TCL

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENT

Top 10 by daily interest

  Device Daily hits  
1.Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max17,322
2.Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra16,297
3.Oppo Find X10 Pro Max15,120
4.Samsung Galaxy A5714,967
5.Xiaomi Poco X8s14,138
6.Nokia 2360 Flip13,488
7.Motorola Signature 2712,988
8.OnePlus Ace 7 Pro12,608
9.Samsung Galaxy A1712,603
10.Xiaomi 18 Pro Max12,486

ELECTRIC VEHICLES

BMW to bring Level 2 advanced driver assistance in German cities in 2027 BMW to bring Level 2 advanced driver assistance in German cities in 2027 2026 BMW i5 xDrive40 reviewToyota and Waymo team to deliver driverless taxis in Japan
ADVERTISEMENT
Ads by Playwire

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS Youtube Instagram TikTok Facebook Twitter

© 2000-2026 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use