TC, 09 May 2012The S3 glossy plastic backpanel is a fingerprint-magnet! :(Well, you would probably put a back cover on it woudn't you?
So what's the problem with it?
qala, 09 May 2012The finger prent on the body killing me :(Don't you know that iPhone is more finger print nightmare that this?
I hope at least some of the new features and the Nature UX will be ported to the Galaxy S II. TouchWiz looks cleaner in this version. :D
This phone is out already . was about to buy it when the lady needed a Forklift to bring it out.Looked more like a plasma TV than a phone. its so BIG i decided to buy something else
TC, 09 May 2012The S3 glossy plastic backpanel is a fingerprint-magnet! :(We would love to know how you know this. At this point til real proof comes along I'm sure most of us will believe more to whats said about that extra coating reducing fingerprints
the sony xperia s retails for around $600 and the samsung galaxy s3 for around $800 and that﻿ itself is enough for me to go ahead and buy the xperia S considering theres not much of a difference in their overall performances in the real world and besides anyone who has brains would not pay that much for a samsung product..a company what simply does is copy tecnologies that have been introduced by other companies improvise it a bit and sell it at a much higher price..yes thats exactly what samsung does.
I love Samsung mobaile phone Galaxy s iii and i see the specification Its good but there is no option for call recording And voice recordings please conforme it in your specification.
Man this phones ugly cant complain really after all its﻿ from shitsung....err samsung .The htc one x and the sony xperia s are made of far better plastics offer similar real world performance (its just the benchmarks the samsung galaxy s3 can brag about) and come considerably cheaper especially the xperia s(the galaxy s3 retails for around 800 bucks,the one x for around 700 and the xperia s for around 600).Comeone guyz anyone intelligent enough would never buy it ..
TSport, 09 May 2012All looks good cept one thing. There is STILL jerkyness in HD video recording. Don't understan... moreStill? Wow you sure know how to troll. Not only was their 1080p smooth, but it was best. Now that they have best again you call it jerky. Then get a camcorder
GS3 is certainly better shaped than GS2. I dont understand poeple bragging about its looks terming them ugly. What revolutionary changes you can make in touch phones? The wise can see how Samsung has done a great job by increasing the actual screen size without much increasing the overall dimensions of the phone. Hats off to Samsung! I expect GS3 to be a bigger hit than GS2
All looks good cept one thing. There is STILL jerkyness in HD video recording. Don't understand why they can't fix that even with such powerfull hardware. Aside 1080 resolution, I wouldn't call that quality "HD"..
But still getting it :)
Primark, 09 May 2012Extreme specs, the only question is what do I do with all the horse power? I mean even if th... moreTotally agree, the current S2 runs blazing fast , I dont think the world needs another phone
Nothing special about this phone other than the quad core processor or mayby the eye tracking. Unattractive design. 720x1280 pixels on a phone is not that new as some* phones like the LG Nitro HD already have it, 1GB Ram is not new, Mali-400MP is old and found on the galaxy s2. S-Voice is useless for me. Micro sim card ? what? HDMI requires an expensive adapter, 2100mAh battery, thats good.
Overall, very fastish, not impressive like WOW! and ugly design. Its thin though. Also blue is a ugly colour on this phone.
Phablet7, 08 May 2012I don't understand why there is such fanboyism here be it for Samsung, Nokia, Apple or xyz. Th... moreDo u really think S2's design is bad? Have u really seen an s2?
But I accept tur comments about s3. It sure is a bad design.
And bragging about their phones is wat makes this fun.. Just like wat happens when u start bragging abt ur football team...
Anyways thank u Mr.Sensible Oracle.
But Design is an EPIC FAIL. I mean come on look at this device it looks like just another SAMSUNG Phone. But actually it was Sammy's Flagship Phone. It was supposed to compete with iPhone 5.
Innovation: 70 out of 100. Eye Tracker, S Voice etc.
Hardware: 98 out of 100. Quad-Core 1.4 with 1GB RAM. Fast Enough. GPU MALI fair enough.
Camera: 60 out of 100. I mean come on it should have been 3D, with a revolutionary innovation. Like 3D Desktop, Icons, Menus... What are you supposed to do with 1.4 GHz Quad-Core?? play some games and thats it... Sammy should have Put some looks on.
Design: Fuck it Man. OLED a great thing. But Shape sucks.. totally!!Why cant they understand that SIMPLER is always BETTER.. Square with round curves, bit of Steel, liquid Metal, Gorilla Glass coating coating on whole phone with a touch Button would have made it a Killer Superphone.
They have give a loose end to iPhone.. THE SHAPE..
Set does not feel solid in Hands.. its light and does give a great feeling. It should have been a bit Solid and smooth.
Cause' they are charging more than Rs75000 for this Bad Boy..
In a single Line... This Bad Boy Galaxy S3 is Powerful and Super intelligent... but has LIMITED Camera capabilities, Boring Interface (OS Ice Cream Sandwich: No 3D EFFECTS OR ANY INNOVATION) and its Shape is BULLSHIT!