The most IMPORTANT spec that I would like to highlight to all Nokia fan. Nokia phone does NOT come with "xenon flash" so u can't take clear picture at low light (at night), LCD flash far more dim compare to xenon flash. Trust me.
I have had the pleasure of having both of these cell-phones K800 and N93. I personally think the N93 camera is better but overall K800 is much better. Nokia N93 is too heavy and feels like you are carrying a rock in your pocket and also the K800 display screen is excellent and the whole cell-phone itself is reseonably priced as compared to Nokia N93.
I work in a factory in Malaysia where these K800 cell-phones are being produced.
Nokia N93 800- 950 CAD
No, unfortunately the K800's video quality remains the same as K750's:(
Maybe K900 will be VGA:)
Nice 1 Dirty Harry! HaHa I Agree with u.. Lets ROB bank and carry a HEAVY metal.. lets go for N93 ^.^ Anyway when is this cool / perfect phone(for me) coming out? Hope it comes out b4 dreamscar asia comes to Singapore lolz.. Peace
It's a fact. Nokia N93 camera is better than k800. It is also a fact nokia is very ugly and big and bulky and sucks and...
The truth hurts so bad...
Iīm very interested about these handycam rumours, so does anyone have ANYTHING solid about a SE phone which takes advantage of the "Handycam" brand? Is it just a story which some hardcore SE fan has started to spread on the forums or what?
Personally, I donīt think that the idea of a handycam is impossible at all. The model, if ever announced, will most likely copy the design of the N90/N92/N93. I also believe that it would hold a far more advanced video recording system than the ancient QCIF. And if it would run on Symbian, it could truly compete with the N93. But the N93 seems quite finished so SE has got to hurry if they want to make it in time for the "race"... Otherwise, it might also compete with the also rumoured N83 (if ever announced).
And a few words about the size of the N93. Itīs not that big, your low-end attempts to somehow make the N93 look less glorious are not only childish but also poor. Letīs try to be mature. The N93 is only about 30 grams heavier than the W900 and holds a lot more inside, they even made an internal radio which seemed to be impossible for the W900.
A phone is huge when you cant fit it in a normal pocket, and you can fit the N93 easily. Thatījust it.
Thankyou John i think i will go for the N93,
i like to rob banks...
i iīm use to carry a heavy magnum 45
Dreadnought says the truth, the 1 kilogram clamshell N93 cant be compared to the K800, N93 is a smartphone and has other features and better video recording, it could be compared to the future SE handycam with UiQ, will be later by the end of the year. And N93 dont released yet, with this BIG phone you can break windows, doors, rob banks and etc.
The main rival of K800 is the N73 and samsung Z710
Why are everyone comparing this brickie with the N93?? Itīs already been proved that the N93 nailed this brickie from the bottom to the top...
The main competitor will be the N73. Thatīs a far more even fight...
It comparison with the review of the n93, the n93's camera is in fact better then the k800's. Unfortunatly, it comes at the cost of it being a brick and barely resembling a mobile phone. The price is also well over the k800s.
Conclusion: K800i will still own!
SE k800 is a 3g phone and has another camera in the front. But apart from that i dont know what the hell the difference is... Can anyone else help?
Click the following link to see pic's of the fone with the final firmware. The final version which goes onto sale later on this month.:
As you can see it is by far the best and nothing can even compare to it... Not even Nokia... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the k790 has different network support, and lacks a second camera for video conferencing.
also i doubt the macro pictures, i dont think k800 will take that bad as the gsmarena proved it to have a very good macro like k750. i think the photographer's hand is ery shaky while using k800, does mobie-review' photographer know how to use this function well? remember that in their site they say n90 managed to have better macro than k750 which is objected by this site by making macro test too. and k750 is winner, so fans of SE dont consider it as a final conclusion, remember the firmware used in that phone isnt be used as final firmware. it will improve surely,
i have read the review on k800 vs n80 and n93, in my own view, k800 pictures reflects reality more precise than n93, and the phone hasn't activated the image stabilizer i think coz it's in automatic mode. if you look at the photos, n93 has very contrasty photos, this is one of the problems in my cybershot carl-zeiss i admit, also note that thisis the factor that bring n90 camera down over k750. canon ixus cameras took real photos than my cybershot, and this is no exception,.. i think the reason why Se didnt put carl zeiss in their phones is due to it's color contrast, so i doubt the early conclusion about n93 having better camera than k800