They cannot beat Samsung.
Cuz only Samsung and Sony can make image sensor.
Even if, Samsung dosen't put dual camera, no one cannot beat them.
Huawei p10 with aperture 2.2 has managed to climb up the charts, p10 plus with 1.8 would blow everything out of water might breach 90 score barrier for first time........
I still love the Pixel better. It have excellent exposure among all the smartphones I have tried.
Dxomark gives to many phones score higher than iphone 6s and 7..
Why does Phone Arena say iphone is the best?
After reading the cons test from DxOmark, frankly I think the sky and the indoor photos are more to be taken by user, but seem P10 fail to manage the sky light and low light lighting condition.
Luminance noise visible in the sky.
Slight color shading noticeable in low-light conditions.
In outdoor shots, details are sometimes lost in darker parts.
Birdifly, 10 Mar 2017I love the low light quality of Huawei's leica lens phone. It keeps details good and less nois... moreThe fact that top end phones can capture great amount of details without the need of flash, there's no point that a high end phone like this can't do it either. Take note, this already has 2 cameras, and it should take advantage of thar
ProJames, 10 Mar 2017Wow. They basically said the camera is the main selling point but they could not beat the high... moreYou should've known that by means of camera, is not only about photos, but video also matters, and that's a weak point of the P10, where it only scores 84
Only spec geeks give a damn about these DxOMark scores.
For the average consumer, only 4 things matter:
1. Fast camera start-up and photo capture
2. Photo sharpness and clarity
3. Video stabilization
4. Ease of use
That's why brands like Sony are flopping, because they fail in these 3 requirements. Most consumers don't bother about fiddling with settings to get a good shot.
Joonius, 11 Mar 2017Sony did... but apparently they can't get their own software to work well with their own hardw... moreYes.. Because they never use 20 or 23mp, only 8mp...
XZ can do 20 and 23 on auto.
Now the XZP and XZs shoot 12mp as default on auto..
Things are gonna change....
[deleted post]So DXO is junk and you are what? gold? smart?
Lmao, I'd rather trust DXO. Hence, your assertion that they are junk just shows you don't have a clue about about photography, the way a camera works or anything involved in it's hardware or software.
I would like to see how you contribute to reviewing a camera in detail, professionaly.
But from what I can say, you haven't even held a DSLR in your hand but are the first to degrade a professional photo laboratory.
[deleted post]File a complaint in court, then. I'm sure yoy can do that
-NEOPHYTE-, 10 Mar 2017And the DxOMark test score for the Xperia XZ Premium is? ... I swear Sony create like ALL th... moreSony did... but apparently they can't get their own software to work well with their own hardware. That seems to be the story from most of the camera reviewers.
Moe, 10 Mar 2017X Performance is better than Z5. Better photos than XZ. It has 95 of autofocus, high scor... morelike i said DXo is shit , i "upgraded" to a Mi 5 from a P8 . Worse choice ever .... unusable camera in low light ...
Wow. They basically said the camera is the main selling point but they could not beat the highest score. That's... like if I said you should pick me in your team since I'm smar, but you can choose one smarter than I.
Camera is still not better than a S7 edge and that was released 8 months before :D
Even with Leicas help they sightly behind.
Hopefully next year they have something amazing.