Samsung Galaxy K zoom review Comments

• Andrew Tan
• tZ43
• 05 Jul 2014

Fail series. Wonder why Samsung still continue this series.

• Rating1 |
• Reply
• Report

• chocowii
• wu4$
• 05 Jul 2014

I lol'd at anti cheat benchmark test. Samsung still cheats eh.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• solidsnake667
• 8jpr
• 05 Jul 2014

qx10 after the latest software update beats this galaxy k

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• pqpL
• 04 Jul 2014

Is it serious? This phone has horrible photo quality. S4 take better photos. Even the Nokia N82 has better camera... I can't believe it. (Did you degrade/ruin the photos to discredit the phone or what?)

• Rating3 |
• Reply
• Report

436161

• RedZobe
• nG$a
• 04 Jul 2014

Nutshell:

It's a Galaxy S3 with a massive camera module on the back.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• drakkar
• pinF
• 04 Jul 2014

conclusion: stillborn

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• willboyce
• mx}w
• 04 Jul 2014

So ugly. Lumia is far better

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• pegasso
• 6%CV
• 04 Jul 2014

strange...
this review has no picture of Galaxy K zoom with its back cover removed.
and i thought the battery is removable.

as far as i know, GSMArena usually took a picture of the device with its back cover removed to show the battery, the card slots and many more.

• Rating1 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• tA$4
• 04 Jul 2014

nice review, but it's too expensive.
the price is similar to Galaxy Note 3 Neo here.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mir
• sxtH
• 04 Jul 2014

Nice phone, but if you can live without the zoom and xenon flash, then you are better off with the S5 which can take overall sharper photos and better videos.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report