Samsung Galaxy K zoom review Comments

• Anonymous
• mhB
• 05 Jul 2014

pegasso, 04 Jul 2014strange... this review has no picture of Galaxy K zoom with its back cover removed. and i ... moreIt is removable.
If you go to phone specs and klick pictures, there is a picture.
And I think they even removed it in the preview video.

Ahy they forgot to mention it in this review and why they didn't post a picture here, I dont know.
I guess they just forgot, they are humans after all.

• Reply

• Anonymous
• mhB
• 05 Jul 2014

If I'm not mistaken, there is a two key press to launch the kamera. It's like shutter-key plus volume or something like that.

Nothing about air-view.
Nothing about turning the sensitivity of the screen up to use with gloves.
And nothing about one-hand operation.
I guess it does not have those features. Or Touchwiz (and other launchers, even vanilla) has too many features to cover all.

• Reply

• AnonD-52738
• tZ4
• 05 Jul 2014

Fail series. Wonder why Samsung still continue this series.

• Reply

• chocowii
• wu4
• 05 Jul 2014

I lol'd at anti cheat benchmark test. Samsung still cheats eh.

• Reply

• AnonD-110477
• 8jp
• 05 Jul 2014

qx10 after the latest software update beats this galaxy k

• Reply

• Anonymous
• pqp
• 04 Jul 2014

Is it serious? This phone has horrible photo quality. S4 take better photos. Even the Nokia N82 has better camera... I can't believe it. (Did you degrade/ruin the photos to discredit the phone or what?)

• Reply

• AnonD-237024
• nG$
• 04 Jul 2014

Nutshell:

It's a Galaxy S3 with a massive camera module on the back.

• Reply

• AnonD-130880
• pin
• 04 Jul 2014

conclusion: stillborn

• Reply

• AnonD-70078
• mx}
• 04 Jul 2014

So ugly. Lumia is far better

• Reply

• pegasso
• 6%C
• 04 Jul 2014

strange...
this review has no picture of Galaxy K zoom with its back cover removed.
and i thought the battery is removable.

as far as i know, GSMArena usually took a picture of the device with its back cover removed to show the battery, the card slots and many more.

• Reply

• Anonymous
• tA$
• 04 Jul 2014

nice review, but it's too expensive.
the price is similar to Galaxy Note 3 Neo here.

• Reply

• mir
• sxt
• 04 Jul 2014

Nice phone, but if you can live without the zoom and xenon flash, then you are better off with the S5 which can take overall sharper photos and better videos.

• Reply