The Galaxy Note 3 is the first Samsung device we test, running on the Qualcomm's latest and greatest Snapdragon 800 chipset. It is powered by a quad-core 2.3GHz Krait 400 processor, with Adreno 330 graphics and has 3GB of RAM - the most of any smart device on the market right now.
The 2.3GHz Krait 400 processor (2.27GHz as per GeekBench), is the fastest on the market, also available in the LG G2 clocked at 2.26GHz.
Our first test is all about single-core performance, where the Galaxy Note 3 shares the first spot with the LG G2. The Galaxy Note 3 and G2's Krait 400 cores run at about 100MHz higher than the rest of the Snapdragon 800 competition, which explains why they managed to beat their Sony peers by a hair.
Benchmark Pi
Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 99
LG G2 99
Sony Xperia Z1 115
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 115
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active 130
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 132
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 132
HTC Butterfly S 135
LG Optimus G Pro 147
HTC One 151
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 166
Sony Xperia Z 264
HTC Butterfly 266
Oppo Find 5 267
HTC One X+ 280
LG Optimus G 285
HTC One mini 293
Samsung Galaxy Note II 305
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 330
LG Optimus 4X HD 350
Samsung Galaxy S III 359
Nexus 4 431
Next up, we put all four cores to the test in the multi-thread version of the Linpack benchmark. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 once again topped our result table, even though things were pretty close.
Linpack
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 1081
LG G2 1054
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 1034
Sony Xperia Z1 1004
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active 818
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 791
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 788
LG Optimus G Pro 743
HTC Butterfly S 669
HTC One 646
Sony Xperia Z 630
HTC Butterfly 624
LG Optimus G 608
Oppo Find 5 593
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 413
HTC One mini 320
Samsung Galaxy Note II 214.3
Nexus 4 213.5
HTC One X+ 177.7
Samsung Galaxy S III 175.5
HTC One X 160.9
LG Optimus 4X HD 141.5
The GeekBench 3 CPU benchmark is where the Galaxy Note 3 readily flexes some muscle to emphatically outdo its competitors. This achievement is somewhat disputed due to recent revelations about Samsung, among others, sexing up their benchmark results by running all cores at full throttle.
What they do is disable the lower-clock modes on all CPU cores – whether or not this is cheating considering benchmarks are all about theoretical maximum performance is something everyone should judge for themselves. Anyway, LG was obviously doing the same with the G2, and yet the Galaxy Note 3 managed to comfortably beat it.
Geekbench 3
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 2937
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 2670
Sony Xperia Z1 2638
Apple iPhone 5s 2561
LG G2 2243
HTC One 1972
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 1869
LG Optimus G 1623
Huawei Ascend P6 1315
LG Nexus 4 1288
HTC Butterfly 1257
Oppo R819 1047
HTC One mini 887
Quadrant and AnTuTu 4 gauge the overall device performance instead of just the CPU and the Galaxy Note 3 managed to conquer the first spot on AnTutu beating the Xperia Z1 by just a few points.
AnTuTu 4
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 31109
Sony Xperia Z1 30850
LG G2 30243
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 29185
Samsung Galaxy S4 27613
HTC One 26389
LG Nexus 4 17006
On Quadrant though, Xperia Z1 remained the champ, while the Galaxy Note 3 had to settle for second.
Quadrant
Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1 20388
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 20052
LG G2 19815
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 18177
HTC Butterfly S 13130
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 12446
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 12376
LG Optimus G Pro 12105
HTC One 11746
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active 11346
Sony Xperia Z 8075
HTC One X+ 7632
LG Optimus G 7439
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 7153
Oppo Find 5 7111
HTC One mini 6048
HTC One X 5952
Samsung Galaxy Note II 5916
Samsung Galaxy S III 5450
Nexus 4 4567
We move on to GPU trials and the Galaxy Note 3 aced both offscreen tests of the GFX Benchmark. Perhaps the extra RAM also allowed the Koreans to reserve more memory for the Adreno 330, resulting in its superior performance.
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 68
Sony Xperia Z1 60
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 60
Apple iPhone 5s 56
LG G2 54
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 43
HTC Butterfly S 42
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 41
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active 41
HTC One 37
Oppo Find 5 32
Google Nexus 4 32
Sony Xperia Z 31
Sony Xperia ZL 31
Sony Xperia SP 31
Apple iPhone 5 30
LG Optimus G Pro 30
LG Optimus G 21
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 17
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 17
Samsung Galaxy Note II 17
HTC One mini 15
HTC One X 11
GLBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 26
Sony Xperia Z1 23
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 23
Apple iPhone 5s 23
LG G2 22
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 17.1
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 17.1
Apple iPad 4 16.8
HTC Butterfly S 16
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active 16
Google Nexus 10 13.9
LG Optimus G 13.9
Sony Xperia Z 13.5
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 13
Sony Xperia ZL 12.8
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 6.4
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 6.3
HTC One mini 5.6
Samsung Galaxy Note II 4.9
The updated Epic Citadel benchmark has the new Ultra High Quality setting and we've re-tested every 1080p device we possibly could. Strangely, the Galaxy Note 3 failed to match the rest of the Snapdragon 800 gang, achieving just under 48 fps.
Epic Citadel
Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z1 54.9
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 54.9
LG G2 51
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 47.7
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 37.2
HTC One 35.6
HTC Butterfly 29.6
The JavaScript performance of the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 web browser is our all-time second-best. The Apple iPhone 5s is the only phone with a better result.
SunSpider
Lower is better
Apple iPhone 5s 403
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 587
Apple iPhone 5 694
Apple iPhone 5c 704
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 750
Sony Xperia Z1 845
LG G2 908
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 1046
HTC One 1174
LG Optimus G 1293
HTC One mini 1375
LG Nexus 4 1379
HTC Butterfly 1397
Oppo R819 1423
Huawei Ascend P6 3858
The combined BrowserMark 2 benchmark saw another impressive result by the Note 3, beating all other droids we have tested, but once again it fell behind Apple's latest.
BrowserMark 2
Higher is better
Apple iPhone 5s 3549
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 3041
Apple iPhone 5 2825
Apple iPhone 5c 2799
LG G2 2718
LG Optimus G 2555
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 2438
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 2419
Sony Xperia Z1 2398
HTC Butterfly S 2378
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active 2338
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 2314
HTC One 2262
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 2170
HTC One mini 2164
Sony Xperia ZL 2107
Sony Xperia Z 2093
LG Optimus G Pro 1801
Oppo Find 5 1797
Nexus 4 1794
Nokia Lumia 920 1774
Google Nexus 10 1773
HTC Butterfly 1475
Samsung Galaxy S III 1247
Finally, in Vellamo the Galaxy Note 3 didn’t rule the rest of the Snapdragon 800-powered devices the way it did elsewhere.
Vellamo
Higher is better
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 2944
LG G2 2908
Sony Xperia Z1 2904
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 2853
HTC Butterfly S 2592
Samsung Galaxy Note II 2418
HTC One 2382
HTC One mini 2252
Sony Xperia Z 2189
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 2078
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 2060
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 2056
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 2019
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active 1936
HTC Butterfly 1866
Oppo Find 5 1658
Samsung Galaxy S III 1641
LG Optimus 4X HD 1568
LG Optimus G 1522
Nexus 4 1310
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is definitely one of the most powerful pieces of hardware in the market, but the rest of the Snapdragon 800 gang are breathing down its neck. Just like the rest of its siblings in chipset, the Galaxy Note 3 has processing power to spare and will breeze through any task. With a screen this size, 3GB of RAM and the multi-view feature, the Note 3 is arguably the greatest multi-tasker around.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up