S Voice is Samsung's answer to Apple's Siri and Google's own Voice Actions - it can be used to initiate or answer a call, dictate text, play music, open an app, change a setting, make a memo (including voice memo), add a reminder, schedule an event, set or snooze an alarm or timer, check the weather, do a search on the internet, take a photo, look for local listings (e.g. nearby restaurants) and even get an answer to a question.
S Voice
The problem is S Voice is not nearly as fast or as accurate at recognizing your speech input as Now.
Naturally, being a Jelly Bean smartphone, the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 also comes with Google Now.
Google Now integrates with your Google account and can access your daily routine, internet searches, email, etc. and give you information relevant to your interests and daily needs.
It provides traffic information to your work or home, knows those scores of sports teams you follow, has the weather forecast for your location and can even tell you who Kevin Spacey is.
Google Now
Google Now also has its own separate widget on the homescreen.
Synthetic benchmarks
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is powered by a Samsung-made Exynos 4212 dual-core chipset with two Cortex-A9 cores clocked at 1.5GHz, 2GB of RAM and a Mali-400 GPU. We've put it head to head with some of the latest phablets and slates around.
In the single-threaded Benchmark Pi (it test just a single CPU core) the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 scores about the same as the Galaxy Note II and Note 8.0, but is largely bested by most of the recently announced flagships out there.
Benchmark Pi
Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy S4 132
LG Optimus G Pro 147
HTC One 151
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 262
Sony Xperia ZL 264
Sony Xperia Z 264
HTC Butterfly 266
Oppo Find 5 267
HTC One X+ 280
LG Optimus G 285
Samsung Galaxy Note II 305
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 318
Google Nexus 10 350
Samsung Galaxy S III 359
Nexus 4 431
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 488
Linpack
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S4 788
LG Optimus G Pro 743
HTC One 646
Sony Xperia ZL 631
Sony Xperia Z 630
HTC Butterfly 624
LG Optimus G 608
Oppo Find 5 593
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 588
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 222
Samsung Galaxy Note II 214
Nexus 4 213
HTC One X+ 177
Samsung Galaxy S III 176
Google Nexus 10 172
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 96
AnTuTu, Geekbench 2 and Quadrant test the whole chipset and the dual-core chipset Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 shows its age.
AnTuTu
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S4 24716
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 24236
HTC One 22678
Sony Xperia Z 20794
Sony Xperia ZL 20743
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 20216
LG Optimus G Pro 20056
HTC Butterfly 19513
Samsung Galaxy S III 15547
Oppo Find 5 15167
Google Nexus 10 12695
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 9070
Geekbench 2
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S4 3227
LG Optimus G Pro 3040
HTC One 2708
Google Nexus 10 2543
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 2200
Sony Xperia Z 2173
HTC Butterfly 2143
Sony Xperia ZL 1995
Samsung Galaxy S III 1845
LG Optimus G 1723
iPhone 5 1601
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 1221
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 1130
Quadrant
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S4 12376
LG Optimus G Pro 12105
HTC One 11746
Sony Xperia Z 8075
Sony Xperia ZL 7912
HTC One X+ 7632
LG Optimus G 7439
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 7215
Oppo Find 5 7111
HTC One X 5952
Samsung Galaxy Note II 5916
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 5864
Samsung Galaxy S III 5450
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 4627
Nexus 4 4567
Google Nexus 10 4385
GLBenchmark 2.x puts the graphics processor to the test, and the device rates towards the bottom half when offscreen fps are measured. Quite expectedly the Tab 3 8.0 scores the same as the Note II and Galaxy S III - they all feature the same GPU.
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
Apple iPad 4 54.4
Google Nexus 10 40
Samsung Galaxy S4 40
HTC One 34
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 32
Asus Padfone 2 31
Oppo Find 5 30
Sony Xperia ZL 29
Sony Xperia Z 29
LG Optimus G 29
HTC Butterfly 27.9
Apple iPhone 5 27
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 26
Nexus 4 26
Samsung Galaxy Note II 17
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 16
Samsung Galaxy S III 15
HTC One X+ 12
HTC One X 9
GLBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S4 17.1
Apple iPad 4 16.8
Google Nexus 10 13.9
LG Optimus G 13.9
Sony Xperia Z 13.5
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 13
Sony Xperia ZL 12.8
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 7.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 4.0
Epic Citadel, on the other hand, measures performance at native resolution, and posts some good numbers.
Epic Citadel
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S4 57.1
HTC One 56.4
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 56.4
Sony Xperia Z 55.6
Sony Xperia ZL 55.4
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 54.6
LG Optimus G Pro 54.2
Nexus 4 53.9
Asus Padfone 2 53.4
LG Optimus G 52.6
Google Nexus 10 52.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 43.1
Samsung Galaxy S III 41.3
Oppo Find 5 38.6
When it comes to JavaScript performance we got a pretty good results from the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0.
SunSpider
Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy S4 810
Samsung Ativ S 891
Apple iPhone 5 915
Nokia Lumia 920 910
Samsung Galaxy Note II 972
HTC One X+ 1001
LG Optimus G Pro 1011
Motorola RAZR i XT890 1059
HTC One 1124
Samsung Galaxy S III 1192
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 1233
Sony Xperia ZL 1290
Sony Xperia Z 1336
LG Optimus G 1353
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 1366
HTC Butterfly 1433
Google Nexus 10 1462
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 1629
Nexus 4 1971
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 posted an average score in the first overall browsing performance benchmark - Vellamo benchmark, but fared surprisingly well at BrowserMark 2.
Vellamo
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Note II 2418
HTC One 2382
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 2265
Sony Xperia Z 2189
Sony Xperia ZL 2186
HTC One X (Tegra 3) 2078
Samsung Galaxy S4 2060
Google Nexus 10 1929
HTC Butterfly 1866
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 1777
Samsung Galaxy S III 1641
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 1633
LG Optimus G 1522
Nexus 4 1310
BrowserMark 2
Higher is better
LG Optimus G 2555
Samsung Galaxy S4 2438
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 2363
HTC One 2262
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 2228
Sony Xperia Tablet Z 2170
Sony Xperia ZL 2107
Sony Xperia Z 2093
LG Optimus G Pro 1801
Oppo Find 5 1797
Nexus 4 1794
Nokia Lumia 920 1774
Google Nexus 10 1773
HTC Butterfly 1475
Samsung Galaxy S III 1247
So, the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is not quite the benchmark champion, but you can't expect anything else from a chipset that's two and a half years old now. What's really important though is that we put it through some real torture and it handled it great - even the heaviest of the games ran decently, all apps delivered excellent performance and the Android OS runs without any hiccups.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up