The iPad Pro is powered by Apple's A9X chip, which Apple says has a 64-bit desktop-class architecture. A few charts, shown at the launch event, detailed the advancements in Apple's tablet performance, and the Pro is said to pack a CPU 1.8 times more powerful than the one in the iPad Air 2 and a GPU twice as powerful.
We ran the usual tests on the iPad Pro to see just how this almighty chip compares against the rest, and we struggled a little with finding what to compare it against. For one, there aren't many tablets with such giant displays, certainly not outside of the proper desktop Windows OS realm.
The Android-running Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 / Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 come to mind but they are 2 years old now, and instead of updating them Samsung seems to be focused on making kitchen tablets. So we rounded up the latest tablets we've tested, regardless of display size, and threw in some of the flagship phones of late.
In Geekbench the iPad Pro scored nearly 5,500 points, which is on par with our current Android champ, the Meizu Pro 5. Samsung flagships with the same chip have been tweaked differently and score lower. However, the more intriguing bit here is single-core performance, and a single 2.26GHz Twister core scores upwards of 3,400 - as much as the dual-core 2.3GHz Denver CPU inside the Nexus 9.
So, Apple's claim for a 1.8x performance improvement over the iPad Air 2, doesn't seem to hold true, at least not in Geekbench - it's more like 20-something percent. The Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet scores almost identical to the iPad Air 2, hence it trails the iPad Pro. The aging Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 is no match for any of the current powerhouses.
Higher is better
In Antutu, the iPad Pro still can't beat the Meizu Pro 5, but does leave the other Exynos 7420 devices behind. It also comfortably outpaces the newest Galaxy Tab S2 9.7. The current-gen iPhones score noticeably lower too.
Higher is better
In Basemark II 2.0, however, the iPad Pro is without competition. The iPhone 6s/6s duo come closest, but still post substantially lower scores.
Higher is better
Graphics tests paint the picture of an extremely powerful GPU. Acing the offscreen part in GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan, the iPad Pro's score drops significantly for the onscreen test. It still scores an excellent 29.4fps, and don't forget that the GPU needs to push some 5.6 million of pixels worth of resolution. The aging Galaxy Note 12.2 scores a meagre 2.2fps in comparison.
Higher is better
Higher is better
Basemark Metal should yield cross-platform-comparable results with its Basemark ES 3.1 Android counterpart. Here the iPad Pro is in a league of its own, scoring twice as high as the iPhones, which are in turn miles ahead of anything Android has to offer right now.
Higher is better
In web browsing, the iPad Pro delivers as well. It only managed to run the JavaScript Kraken benchmark, but it passed with flying colors, scoring higher than the iPhone 6s and miles ahead of Android flagships. Our other usual test - Browsermark - was unfortunately a no-go on Apple's tablet, just like it was on the iPhone 6s.
Lower is better
Overall, the iPad Pro aced all tests and proved that Apple has indeed built some serious hardware into it. There's hardly a tablet on the market now with more punch - at least one running a mobile OS, that is.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up