GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

1.7m
126k
RSS

EV

Merch

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • Deals
  • MerchNew
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENT
GSMArena team, 5 November 2014

The Big Bang


iPhone 6 Plus vs. Galaxy Note 4: The Big Bang

  • Comments (403)
  • iPhone 6 Plus
  • Galaxy Note 4

6. Performance
  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Hardware comparison
  3. 3. Display, connectivity, battery life
  4. 4. User interface
  5. 5. User interface (continued)
  6. 6. Performance
  7. 7. Multimedia package, loudspeaker, audio quality
  8. 8. Still camera
  9. 9. Video camera
  10. 10. Low-light test
  11. 11. Conclusion
  12.  
  13. Apple iPhone 6 Plus specification
  14. Samsung Galaxy Note 4 specification
  15. Review comments (403)

Apple iOS Samsung Android

Performance

Both Apple and Samsung make their own chipsets, but Samsung has been using Qualcomm chips heavily since the previous generation and indeed we have tested the Snapdragon 805 version of the Galaxy Note 4 instead of the Exynos one.

Apple tuned its chipset to the iOS multitasking model - one app gets most of the resources, while the ones in the background have limited ways to continue working. This means there's no need for many CPU cores and the Apple A8 chipset has only two. They are proper monsters though, as we're about to see.

Android chipsets have four cores, even for relatively inexpensive devices. This reflects the more desktop-like multitasking approach, so Qualcomm and others save power by splitting the load between multiple cores and clocking them up and down as needed.

The quad-core Krait 450 in the Galaxy Note 4 is the latest available in Snapdragon until the 64-bit Snapdragon 810 shows up. Clocked at the impressive 2.7GHz the four cores show excellent multitasking performance. Android 5.0 Lollipop should speed things up, though the new runtime includes enhancements specifically for 64-bit processors, which this Note 4 will not receive.

The two iPhone 6 Plus cores flex their individual muscles for a result in Geekbench 3 that's practically equal, it even comes out ahead in Basemark OS II.

GeekBench 3

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    3178
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
    3011
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    2925
  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    2884
  • Sony Xperia Z3
    2860
  • LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
    2563
  • HTC One (M8)
    2367

Basemark OS II (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7
    10391
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
    10063
  • HTC One (M8)
    9860
  • LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
    9611
  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    9604
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    9446
  • Sony Xperia Z3
    8792

The single-core performance for the iPhone 6 Plus is nearly double what the Galaxy Note 4 achieves, but it has only half as many cores so things balance out.

Basemark OS II (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    4031
  • Oppo Find 7
    2606
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    2588
  • HTC One (M8)
    2428
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
    2415
  • LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
    2213
  • Sony Xperia Z3
    2114

The GPUs are supplied by Imagination and Qualcomm - a PowerVR GX6450 for the iPhone 6 Plus and Adreno 420 for the Galaxy Note 4 (alternatively, Mali-T760 for the Exynos-powered Note 4).

The 1080p off-screen performance of the two is essentially equal, confirmed by two versions of GFX Bench (2.7 T-Rex and 3.0 Manhattan) and Basemark X. 1080p also happens to be iPhone 6 Plus's native resolution, but the Galaxy Note Edge has to push nearly 80% more pixels.

Of course, game engines have the option to render at a lower internal resolution and then stretch the output to match the screen. For well-written games the two phablets should offer equal performance.

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    44.6
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    41.7
  • HTC One (M8)
    28.4
  • Oppo Find 7
    28
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
    27.8
  • Sony Xperia Z3
    27.7
  • LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
    27.2

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    18.6
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    18.5
  • Sony Xperia Z3
    12
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
    11.8
  • LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
    11.4
  • HTC One (M8)
    11.1
  • Oppo Find 7
    11.1

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    18684
  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    18297
  • Oppo Find 7
    14968
  • Sony Xperia Z3
    12637
  • HTC One (M8)
    12396
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
    11744
  • LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
    11552

JavaScript code is single-threaded but the sizeable performance difference between Apple's Cyclone cores and the Krait 450 doesn't make much of a difference in Kraken 1.1. Both Apple and Samsung go a long way in tweaking their JavaScript engines to run as fast as possible.

Kraken 1.1

Lower is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    4650
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    5351
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
    6043
  • Sony Xperia Z3
    6355
  • Oppo Find 7
    6363
  • LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
    6987
  • HTC One (M8)
    10296

Rendering pages is noticeably faster on the iPhone 6 Plus though, surely helped by the lower screen resolution. Both are some of the fastest web browsing mobiles but BrowserMark 2.1 heavily favors the iPhone.

BrowserMark 2.1

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    3389
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    2208
  • Sony Xperia Z3
    1533
  • LG G3 (2GB/16GB)
    1474
  • Oppo Find 7
    1452
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 (S801)
    1398
  • HTC One (M8)
    1069

Winner: Apple iPhone 6 Plus. Games will be simpler to optimize for Apple's few target devices and web browsing goes smoother on the iPhone.

The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is practically an equal to the 6 Plus in terms of CPU and GPU though its QHD screen trades quality for speed for some games and for web pages.

Next Page » 7. Multimedia package, loudspeaker, audio quality
6. Performance
  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Hardware comparison
  3. 3. Display, connectivity, battery life
  4. 4. User interface
  5. 5. User interface (continued)
  6. 6. Performance
  7. 7. Multimedia package, loudspeaker, audio quality
  8. 8. Still camera
  9. 9. Video camera
  10. 10. Low-light test
  11. 11. Conclusion
  12.  
  13. Apple iPhone 6 Plus specification
  14. Samsung Galaxy Note 4 specification
  15. Review comments (403)

Reviews iPhone 6 Plus vs. Galaxy Note 4Page 6
  • Comments (403)
  • iPhone 6 Plus
  • Galaxy Note 4

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • BlackBerry
  • Asus
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • Microsoft
  • Vodafone
  • Energizer
  • Cat
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • Ulefone
  • Tecno
  • Doogee
  • Blackview
  • Cubot
  • Oukitel
  • Itel
  • TCL

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENT

Related articles

  • Top 10 trending phones of week 48
  • Apple Watch Series 9 review
  • Apple Watch Series 9 (Product) Red announced
  • Entire iPhone 16 lineup rumored to feature Action Button
ADVERTISEMENT

Popular reviews

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE review
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE review
Poco F5 / Redmi Note 12 Turbo long-term review
Poco F5 / Redmi Note 12 Turbo long-term review
OnePlus Open review
OnePlus Open review

ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Mini Cooper SE JCW unveiled with more hype than horsepower Mini Cooper SE JCW unveiled with more hype than horsepower Tesla whistleblower raises concerns about FSD safetyThe next Chevy Bolt - GM's electric odyssey continues
ADVERTISEMENT

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2023 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data